---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24220/
---
(Updated Sept. 3, 2014, 6:52 p.m.)
Review request for lucene.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24220/
---
(Updated Sept. 3, 2014, 8:30 p.m.)
Review request for lucene.
Changes
The changes are not much from my patch , so , it looks fine
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24220/
Review request for lucene.
By Mark Miller.
*Updated
Yeah, like I said, the main sticking points after we agreed on the architecture
change and you pulled zkstatereader from clusterstate were the doc and some
naming. I didn't change how anything was done. There is more I'd like to do in
terms of refactoring, but I don't have the time short term
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24220/
---
(Updated Sept. 2, 2014, 5:28 p.m.)
Review request for lucene.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24220/
---
Review request for lucene.
Repository: lucene
Description
---
Split
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24220/
---
(Updated Aug. 4, 2014, 12:04 a.m.)
Review request for lucene.
Changes
