Re: reviews.apache.org / GIT migration

/ GIT migration Thanks for the input guys. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:37 PM Mike Drob <md...@apache.org> wrote: To add another possibility to the mix, I'd suggest using something like Apache Yetus to manage commit process. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Gregory Chanan <gcha...@clo

reviews.apache.org / GIT migration

Hello. Having not used it before, I'd like to try out reviews.apache.org (even though it's only been used a few times for the project in the past based on the https://reviews.apache.org/groups/lucene/ listing). The review board seems so far unware of the svn-to-git migration. Other projects

Re: reviews.apache.org / GIT migration

+1; I can't see how anyone would object to adding/retaining support for the tool. Nobody is forced to use it. I'm curious of the move to Git allows for possibly better options. I've heard good things about Gerrit but I've never tried it. I have mixed feelings of my experience with Reviewboard,

Re: reviews.apache.org / GIT migration

IMO reviewboard with git is strictly better than reviewboard with svn; getting reviewboard from svn to accept my patches was always a chore -- I've never had that problem with git. I have mixed feelings about gerrit. The main advantages are: 1) automatic pre commit checks (i.e. I can have it run

Re: reviews.apache.org / GIT migration

To add another possibility to the mix, I'd suggest using something like Apache Yetus to manage commit process. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Gregory Chanan wrote: > IMO reviewboard with git is strictly better than reviewboard with svn; > getting reviewboard from svn to

Re: reviews.apache.org / GIT migration

Thanks for the input guys. On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:37 PM Mike Drob wrote: > To add another possibility to the mix, I'd suggest using something like > Apache Yetus to manage commit process. > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Gregory Chanan > wrote: >