Do you mean a new Solr/Lucene index, or a new document with only the snippet?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Scott Gonyea sc...@aitrus.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to get some direction on where I should focus my attention, with
regards to the Solr codebase and documentation. Rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Toke Eskildsen updated LUCENE-2369:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2369.patch
Preliminary patch with the primary purpose of testing the
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/91/changes
Changes:
[simonw] LUCENE-2239: Documented NIOFSDirectory and MMapDirectory limitations
due to Java NIO behavior when a Thread is interrupted while blocking on IO.
[simonw] LUCENE-2590: Enable access to the freq information in a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12905507#action_12905507
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-2369:
{quote}
They are just regular terms! you
See https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1235/changes
Changes:
[rmuir] optimize surrogate case
[mikemccand] allow leading wildcard in contrib/benchmark's FileBasedQueryMaker
--
[...truncated 6199 lines...]
[junit] 2010-09-02 09.54.43
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley reopened SOLR-1665:
Assignee: (was: Grant Ingersoll)
TODO: this doesn't work with distributed search.
It's not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12905531#action_12905531
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1665:
---
Argh, I always forget the distributed stuff.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12905507#action_12905507
]
Toke Eskildsen edited comment on LUCENE-2369 at 9/2/10 11:14 AM:
TeeSinkCodec and FilteringCodec
---
Key: LUCENE-2632
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2632
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Index
Affects Versions: 4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-2632:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2632.patch
Initial implementation. TeeSinkCodec was only tested
Hi,
This post is related to SOLR-1475 - 'Java-based remplication doesn't
properly reserve its commit point during backups', and index backups in
general.
In Solr 1.4 and 1.4.1, the SOLR-1475 patch is certainly there, but I don't
believe it truly addresses the problem.
Here's why:
When a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-1665:
-
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
Add debugTimings param so that timings for components can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1665:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1665.patch
Adds distributed support.
Add debugTimings param so that timings
A new document, yes. I should watch my terminology closer.
Scott
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you mean a new Solr/Lucene index, or a new document with only the
snippet?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Scott Gonyea sc...@aitrus.org wrote:
Hi,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1665:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1665.patch
patch for distributed, plust test
Add debugTimings param so that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2611:
Attachment: LUCENE-2611_test.patch
{quote}
bq. In DIH's TestVariableResolver, two tests use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-374:
---
Attachment: SegmentInfo.patch
Hi Paul,
You are right. I added a few lines to your test case
{code}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12905683#action_12905683
]
Paul Gunn commented on LUCENENET-374:
-
Looks good Digy - I figured the fix would be
Getting assert in SegmentReader.cs (Lucene.net_2_9_2)
-
Key: LUCENENET-375
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-375
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Bug
19 matches
Mail list logo