[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8246) create_core command gives confusing messages if broken config is given, fixed, given again

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15007961#comment-15007961 ] Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-8246: --- Just spent half an hour or so messing around with different

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-7928) Improve CheckIndex to work against HdfsDirectory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gregory Chanan updated SOLR-7928: - Attachment: SOLR-7928.patch Updated patch. Uses HdfsTestUtil for getting the configuration. Adds

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8266) Remove Java Serialization from the Streaming API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15007877#comment-15007877 ] Jason Gerlowski commented on SOLR-8266: --- Quick update- I haven't had time to get around to this yet.

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8301) We should distinguish between top-level queries and sub-queries when reporting stats

Erick Erickson created SOLR-8301: Summary: We should distinguish between top-level queries and sub-queries when reporting stats Key: SOLR-8301 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8301

Re: [nag] [VOTE] Release PyLucene 4.10.4-1

+1 On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > +1 (from a user)

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7 - Build # 3770 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/3770/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test Error Message: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:42284/_hwt/u/awholynewcollection_0: non ok status: 500, message:Server Error Stack

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8220) Read field from docValues for non stored fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya updated SOLR-8220: --- Attachment: SOLR-8220-ishan.patch Updated last patch to use FieldInfos, since

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-8220) Read field from docValues for non stored fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15008058#comment-15008058 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-8220 at 11/17/15 5:39 AM: --

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java8 - Build # 632 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java8/632/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.PingRequestHandlerTest.testPingInClusterWithNoHealthCheck Error Message: Could not find a healthy node to handle the request. Stack Trace:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.7.0_80) - Build # 14634 - Failure!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/14634/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_80 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestReplicaProperties.test Error Message: Collection testcollection does not have roles evenly distributed.

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6371) Correct the insane rows=10 for the example search results clustering handler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated SOLR-6371: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.10) (was: Trunk) > Correct the insane rows=10 for the

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8294) Cleanup solrconfig.xmls under solr/example/example-DIH/solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dawid Weiss updated SOLR-8294: -- Attachment: SOLR-8294.patch This patch removes the clustering config from DIHs examples. The clustering

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8294) Cleanup solrconfig.xmls under solr/example/example-DIH/solr

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15006452#comment-15006452 ] Dawid Weiss commented on SOLR-8294: --- Also, the configs aren't even consistent -- for example

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6890) Specialize 1D dimensional values intersection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15006418#comment-15006418 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6890: bq. you've mentioned that you wanted to uploaded

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-6890) Specialize 1D dimensional values intersection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-6890: --- Attachment: LUCENE-6890.patch Patch, that adds too much code complexity, is buggy

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8294) Cleanup solrconfig.xmls under solr/example/example-DIH/solr

Dawid Weiss created SOLR-8294: - Summary: Cleanup solrconfig.xmls under solr/example/example-DIH/solr Key: SOLR-8294 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8294 Project: Solr Issue

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-6890) Specialize 1D dimensional values intersection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15006416#comment-15006416 ] Daniel Mitterdorfer commented on LUCENE-6890: - Hi [~mikemccand] you've mentioned that you

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8280) TestCloudSchemaless + ChangedSchemaMergeTest fail weirdly if you try to use SolrCoreAware sim factory: SchemaSimilarityFactory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15006470#comment-15006470 ] Alan Woodward commented on SOLR-8280: - I have a half-implemented patch hanging around somewhere that

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8292) TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null for EOF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15006519#comment-15006519 ] Renaud Delbru commented on SOLR-8292: - I have reviewed all the methods writing records to the tlog

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8292) TransactionLog.next() does not honor contract and return null for EOF

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15006537#comment-15006537 ] Renaud Delbru commented on SOLR-8292: - The convention over the log reader is that it should not be used

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8220) Read field from docValues for non stored fields

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15006538#comment-15006538 ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-8220: Thanks for the patch, Keith. I couldn't apply the

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_66) - Build # 14635 - Still Failing!

Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-5.x-Linux/14635/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_66 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestCloudPivotFacet.test Error Message: init query failed:

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-8293) JSON API facet doesnt return results when filtering on a facet with zero value

Yaniv Hemi created SOLR-8293: Summary: JSON API facet doesnt return results when filtering on a facet with zero value Key: SOLR-8293 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8293 Project: Solr

Re: test suite counter skipping numbers?

Yeah... it'd be perfect to make it somehow configurable so that tweaks like this can be done without changing the code. I'll see what I can do. https://github.com/randomizedtesting/randomizedtesting/issues/220 By the way -- if any of you guys is using argument factory methods I've added a nicer

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8293) JSON API facet doesnt return results when filtering on a facet with zero value

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yaniv Hemi updated SOLR-8293: - Description: When requesting for a facet using the facet API on a specific field that doesnt have

<    1   2