I could probably take a stab at Sharpen this weekend. I need to pull down
the java version of lucene anyways.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote:
For number 2, you're spot on - free to the Lucene.Net project is probably
the relevant piece. Someone
Scripted, automated and repeatable are mantras to live by. Why not
take it all the way?
What I mean by this is setting up the new, fresh, Lucene 3.0 project
to do something like the following:
1) setup a CI server that grabs the current stable java source
automatically from SVN and runs our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977677#action_12977677
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2837:
-
Mike that patch looks good to me. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977717#action_12977717
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2837:
Good point Simon -- I'll add that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977719#action_12977719
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2831:
Looks good Simon! Random
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2843.
Resolution: Fixed
Add variable-gap terms index impl.
If you are using Lucene's trunk (to be 4.0) builds, read on...
I just committed LUCENE-2843, which is a hard break on the index file format.
If you are living on Lucene's trunk then you have to remove any
previously created indices and re-index, after updating.
The change cuts over to a more
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/3385/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.TestThreadSafe.testLazyLoadThreadSafety
Error Message:
unable to create new native thread
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2837.
Resolution: Fixed
Collapse Searcher/Searchable/IndexSearcher; remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977753#action_12977753
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-2837:
-
This broke ant target 'eclipse' - just fixed it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977765#action_12977765
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2821:
-
Since contrib/remote is now gone i want to:
*
Maybe because i have a fast internet connection and its easier for me
to checkout a clean svn area for each issue (am I the only one that
does this?)
I used the 'eclipse' target several times already, thanking you each time
for adding it!
So I prefer the short names.
BTW in the proposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977784#action_12977784
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2837:
-
{quote}
This broke ant target 'eclipse' - just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2657:
Attachment: LUCENE-2657.patch
Removed {{lucene/contrib/remote/}} (LUCENE-2837)
Replace Maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977791#action_12977791
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2155:
Bill, you can find examples here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977833#action_12977833
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Perhaps it's best to place the RAM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2831:
Attachment: LUCENE-2831.patch
Updated to trunk and fixed some variable naming
I just cleaned up a few more unnecessary ones.
Really, we need to break out atomic vs composite IndexReaders.
Effectively, we already have, it's just that it's dynamically typed
(you hit exc's at runtime) not statically typed. I'd like to make it
statically typed so it's clear which APIs take
I do agree we should be returning null not EMPTY_DOCIDSET since
Filter.getDocIDSet's jdoc clearly states a null return means no docs are
accepted.
I disagree. NULL is a stupid indicator, if something is empty it should
return something empty. I also don't like somebody returning NULL instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977872#action_12977872
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2831:
--
I'm browsing through this latest patch a
Modify default solrconfig parameters via JMX
Key: SOLR-2306
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2306
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: SearchComponents -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Nithian updated SOLR-2306:
---
Attachment: tuning.patch
This is the first version of the making parameters writable via JMX.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977878#action_12977878
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2831:
-
bq. ReaderContextBuilder.numLeafes uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-2837:
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Collapse Searcher/Searchable/IndexSearcher;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2837:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Collapse Searcher/Searchable/IndexSearcher; remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977882#action_12977882
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2837:
I agree we should fix 3.x, too.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977888#action_12977888
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2831:
Patch looks good!
There's a
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
I do agree we should be returning null not EMPTY_DOCIDSET since
Filter.getDocIDSet's jdoc clearly states a null return means no docs are
accepted.
I disagree. NULL is a stupid indicator, if something is empty it should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977892#action_12977892
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
Another model we could implement is a
I do agree we should be returning null not EMPTY_DOCIDSET since
Filter.getDocIDSet's jdoc clearly states a null return means no docs
are accepted.
I disagree. NULL is a stupid indicator, if something is empty it
should return something empty. I also don't like somebody returning
NULL
Support all of unicode in StandardTokenizer
---
Key: LUCENE-2847
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Analysis
DisjunctionMaxQuery toString uses single pipe to join sub terms
---
Key: LUCENE-2848
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2848
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2847:
Attachment: LUCENE-2847.patch
Here's a patch... I added a simple test.
I'm sure it can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2831:
Attachment: LUCENE-2831.patch
fixed those little spelling issues added a children()
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Scorer is an iterator :-)
Aha! You are right... I keep forgetting this about Scorer :)
In some cases the null return can make a difference in performance, eg if BQ
is OR'ing two terms, but one of them yields a null scorer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977912#action_12977912
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2831:
+1!
But there's still a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977913#action_12977913
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2831:
-
bq. But there's still a numLeafes in
Some other ideas:
Maybe add an isEmpty() hint method to DocIdSet(Iterator). Empty DocIdSet
would always return true. The problem, this method is costly for OpenBitSet.
Maybe its just a hint. Returning false is also OK when its empty. So if
you have an docIdSet thatÂ’s empty and you can easily
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2837.
Resolution: Fixed
Collapse Searcher/Searchable/IndexSearcher; remove
What happens with PMS? Maybe we should backport the parallelization of
IndexSearcher to 3.x! Then we can also deprecate.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: mikemcc...@apache.org
Good idea! I'll reopen...
Mike
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
What happens with PMS? Maybe we should backport the parallelization of
IndexSearcher to 3.x! Then we can also deprecate.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-2837:
Reopen to also backport merging of PMS into IS in 3.x.
Collapse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977923#action_12977923
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2837:
--
The multithreaded stuff feels like it should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2831:
Attachment: LUCENE-2831.patch
final patch, fixed the leafes problem and added changes.txt
PHPSerialized fails with sharded queries
Key: SOLR-2307
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2307
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Response Writers
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Antonio Verni updated SOLR-2307:
Attachment: PHPSerializedResponseWriter.java.patch
PHPSerialized fails with sharded queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12977945#action_12977945
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2831:
---
Go ahead, looks good, +1
If there are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-1268:
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5)
Incorporate Lucene's FastVectorHighlighter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-2831.
-
Resolution: Fixed
committed in revision 1055636
Revise Weight#scorer
On Jan 5, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
BUT:
I am just upset about such code:
final DocIdSet dis = filter.getDocIdSet(reader);
if (dis == null)
return null;
final DocIdSetIterator disi = dis.iterator();
if (disi == null)
return null;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-2837:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2837.patch
How about this little patch to avoid creation of IndexSearcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978012#action_12978012
]
Ron Veenstra commented on SOLR-236:
---
I have also been getting a null pointer exception:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978021#action_12978021
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2837:
bq. How about this little patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978023#action_12978023
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2831:
--
Regarding this assert in IndexSearcher:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978027#action_12978027
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2847:
-
JFlex generates fine, everything compiles, all
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Some other ideas:
Maybe add an isEmpty() hint method to DocIdSet(Iterator). Empty DocIdSet
would always return true. The problem, this method is costly for OpenBitSet.
Maybe its just a hint. Returning false is also OK when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978037#action_12978037
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2847:
-
{quote}
If we add a target in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978052#action_12978052
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2831:
--
I see another related bug I think:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978060#action_12978060
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
{queue}
Another model we could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978059#action_12978059
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2324:
{quote}
Taking a step back, I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978061#action_12978061
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2831:
-
bq. This is a bug in ReaderUtil.build()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978065#action_12978065
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
We're going to great lengths it seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978075#action_12978075
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
--
{quote}I believe we can drop the
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1417/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 4457 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978088#action_12978088
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2831:
--
Should Filter.getDocIDSet take an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978096#action_12978096
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2831:
--
Do we have any good MultiReader tests?
we recently are interested in this problem. if we come up with a
patch, I'd like
to share it with everyone.
2011/1/4 Michael McCandless luc...@mikemccandless.com:
2011/1/4 Li Li fancye...@gmail.com:
I agree with you that we should not tie concurrency w/in a single search to
index segments.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch
Same as the last patch, however default deletes is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2847:
Attachment: LUCENE-2847.patch
New patch, with the following changes:
# Added a new target
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-2847:
Attachment: LUCENE-2847.patch
Removed the WARNING from the {{UAX29URLEmailTokenizer}} class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978130#action_12978130
]
Steven Rowe edited comment on LUCENE-2847 at 1/6/11 12:16 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2324:
-
Attachment: test.out
Here's a new test.out, I'll look at TestCheckIndex which should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978141#action_12978141
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2847:
-
bq. We could also consolidate tools, because in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978158#action_12978158
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2831:
-
bq. So we should either change to
74 matches
Mail list logo
