Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7//
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterDelete.testApplyDeletesOnFlush
Error Message:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/checkout/lucene/build/test/4/
Actually DocTermsIndex entry can take quite some memory. I believe in
the case when you have a lot of unique strings more memory is used for
DocTermsIndex then if you have a small number of unique fieldvalues
with many documents per value.
I do think that an option that decides whether a double ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159850#comment-13159850
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2920:
Thanks for noticing my issue, Hoss.
"combine" vs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3608.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
-1 seems like the only reasonable solution...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3584.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
> bulk postings should be codec private
> --
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/11604/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleJettyTest.testCommitWithin
Error Message:
expected:<1> but was:<0>
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2280:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2280.patch
SOLR-2280-3x.patch
Here's a patch for trunk (SOLR-2280.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159755#comment-13159755
]
Matt Parker commented on SOLR-2914:
---
Thanks for reviewing my posts. I'll look more into t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl reassigned SOLR-2280:
-
Assignee: Jan Høydahl
> commitWithin ignored for a delete query
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159735#comment-13159735
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2824:
bq. 1) should local params from the '{!join...}' e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2824:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2824.patch
I hacked up a test case demonstrating the problem, but ran out of time before i
c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159729#comment-13159729
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3610:
--
bq. in either case: is there really any down
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159718#comment-13159718
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3610:
--
That's one example ... some of the other methods i w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159714#comment-13159714
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3610:
--
I think we should just avoid using "x" and "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159656#comment-13159656
]
Spyros Kapnissis edited comment on SOLR-2767 at 11/29/11 11:42 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2767?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Spyros Kapnissis updated SOLR-2767:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2767.patch
A simple patch to avoid the ClassCastException by doing an instanc
Hi Martijn,
Thanks for the response!
Doesn't it take a lot more memory to hold a string field in the FieldCache than
a long field?
In our grouping scenario, we have many unique values with a small number of
documents per group. I would think that even the double FieldCache memory hit
on a lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2929.
Resolution: Not A Problem
This is the expected behavior.
TermsComponent deals with the raw underlying Term
Revamp spatial APIs that use primitives (or arrays of primitives) in their
args/results so that they use strongly typed objects
---
Key: LUCENE-3610
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved LUCENE-3599.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Assignee: David Smiley
Oy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159601#comment-13159601
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-3599:
--
Committed revision 1208118. - trunk
Committed revisi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3609:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3609.patch
Path with testcase testing all special cases (all patches for 3.
If I remember correctly this was done to avoid insane FieldCache usage.
If Term based grouping implementation is used then for that field an
entry is created in the FieldCache of type DocTermsIndex. It might
then happen that for other search features like sorting and faceting a
second entry is cre
Hi All,
I'm new to solr development. Since I'm new with the code base, I thought
I'd double check here before making a JIRA issue. We're trying to use
grouping on a field with a type of long (on trunk):
The performance wasn't what we were looking for so I'm taking a quick
look at the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3609:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-3609.patch)
> BooleanFilter changed behavior in 3.5, no longe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3609:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3609.patch
> BooleanFilter changed behavior in 3.5, no longer acts as i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3609:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3609.patch
Here the fix with short-circuit.
> BooleanFilte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159543#comment-13159543
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3609:
---
bq. not sure why the bool filter does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3609:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3609.patch
This is the easy patch. We still need a test, but it fixes the b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159526#comment-13159526
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-3609:
I don't think this is the best fix, since null v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159524#comment-13159524
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3609:
---
I agree there is something wrong. The filt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2920?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159522#comment-13159522
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2920:
David:
+1 to the refactoring ... thta's a great idea to h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159512#comment-13159512
]
Shay Banon edited comment on LUCENE-3609 at 11/29/11 8:22 PM:
-
Thanks for fixing, Hoss. - Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 1:45 PM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SolrCore.java imports
> "org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ThisExpression"
>
>
> : I'm wondering if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159512#comment-13159512
]
Shay Banon commented on LUCENE-3609:
What I am saying is that BooleanFilter used to a
On Nov 29, 2011, at 15:18, Bill Janssen wrote:
> I've once again spent an hour building PyLucene, which gives me some
> sympathy for issue 10:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-10
>
> I was thinking about how to address this...
>
> One thing I've found useful at PARC is to se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159485#comment-13159485
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3609 at 11/29/11 8:00 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159485#comment-13159485
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3609:
---
Shay,
there was no change caused by LUCEN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159480#comment-13159480
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3609:
-
{quote}
For example, a single must clause and
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/11585/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.search.TestRealTimeGet.testStressGetRealtime
Error Message:
java.lang.AssertionError: Some threads threw uncaught exceptions!
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2819.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.6
Assignee: Hoss Man
Nice catch Be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-3609:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
I will look into this.
> BooleanFilter changed
BooleanFilter changed behavior in 3.5, no longer acts as if "minimum should
match" set to 1
---
Key: LUCENE-3609
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3609
: I'm wondering if the import for
: "org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ThisExpression" in SolrCore.java introduced in
: r1196797 (SOLR-2861) was a mistake. It adds an additional .jar
: dependency and doesn't seem to be used.
I asked yonik about this on IRC last week when i saw your email and he
said
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mikhail Khludnev updated SOLR-2382:
---
Attachment:
TestCachedSqlEntityProcessor.java-wrong-pk-detected-due-to-lack-of-where-support.p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159418#comment-13159418
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-2382:
James,
Your observation contradicts to th
This is OS X Leopard with (32-bit) Python 2.5 and (32-bit) Java 1.5:
[...]
g++ -Wl,-F. -bundle -undefined dynamic_lookup -arch i386 -arch ppc
build/temp.macosx-10.5-i386-2.5/build/_lucene/__init__.o
build/temp.macosx-10.5-i386-2.5/build/_lucene/__wrap01__.o
build/temp.macosx-10.5-i386-2.5/build
I'm trying to install PyLucene 3.4 on my OS X Leopard system. JCC
compiles and installs just fine, the Java bits of Lucene compile OK (a
few warnings), but the last part of the build fails thusly:
[...]
/usr/bin/python -m jcc --shared --jar
lucene-java-3.4.0/lucene/build/lucene-core-3.4.0.jar --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159392#comment-13159392
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3607:
{quote}
bq. Wait, does Solr rep
Do you know how big the documents are that you are trying to delete/update?
I'm trying to find a copy of 2.9.2 to see if I can reproduce it.
Thanks,
Christopher
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Trevor Watson <
powersearchsoftw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the duplicate post. I was on the r
I don't recall seeing a close function on the analyzer. But I will
definitely take a look. Thanks!
On Tuesday, November 29, 2011, Oren Eini (Ayende Rahien)
wrote:
> You need to close the analyzer.
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Trevor Watson <
> powersearchsoftw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
> I was editing Lucene's HowToUpdateTheWebsite wiki page and noticed that none
> of the ReleaseTodo wiki page instructions refer to Grant's cron job
> (mentioned in the "Production Push" section on the HowToUpdateTheWebsite). I
> was curio
Sorry for the duplicate post. I was on the road and posted both via my web
mail and office mail by mistake
The increase is a very gradual, the program starts at about 160,000k
according to task manager (I know that's not entirely accurate, but it was
the best I had at the time) and would, after a
TermsComponent Adding entries
-
Key: SOLR-2929
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2929
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SearchComponents - other
Affects Versions: 3.4, 3.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159348#comment-13159348
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2921:
--
Hmmm, what about stemmers? Prefix only?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159335#comment-13159335
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-3602:
--
Great to see this moving out of Solr
I was editing Lucene's HowToUpdateTheWebsite wiki page and noticed that none of
the ReleaseTodo wiki page instructions refer to Grant's cron job (mentioned in
the "Production Push" section on the HowToUpdateTheWebsite). I was curious
whether that cron job was still working, so I took a look at
MultiFields.getUniqueFieldCount is broken
-
Key: LUCENE-3608
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3608
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.0
Reporter
TestIndexingPerformance leaves a write.lock after it finishes
-
Key: SOLR-2928
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2928
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporte
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1103/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 11430 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For addition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3601.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
i'll mark this resolved, everything is ok but we sti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159270#comment-13159270
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3604:
Thanks. It's clear now !
> 3x/l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159269#comment-13159269
]
Steven Rowe edited comment on LUCENE-3604 at 11/29/11 1:41 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159269#comment-13159269
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3604:
-
Shai,
I updated both the ReleaseTodo and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159248#comment-13159248
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2880:
---
Committed - thanks Sami!
> Investig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13159238#comment-13159238
]
meghana commented on SOLR-1604:
---
I have installed complexphrase parser and followed all instr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sami Siren updated SOLR-2880:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2880-merge-elections.patch
The attached patch merges the election code. The OverseerElect
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/1102/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.SolrExampleStreamingBinaryTest.testLukeHandler
Error Message:
expected: 5 but had: 3 :: {numFound=3,start=0,docs=[SolrDocument[{id=ID0}],
SolrDocument
SolrIndexSearcher's register do not match close and SolrCore's closeSearcher
Key: SOLR-2927
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2927
Project: Solr
Issue
69 matches
Mail list logo
