[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241615#comment-13241615
]
Andi Vajda commented on PYLUCENE-17:
Yes, this makes sense. Looking at your backtrace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PYLUCENE-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241868#comment-13241868
]
Greg Bowyer commented on PYLUCENE-17:
-
check that makes sense, again I am looking at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241049#comment-13241049
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-2983:
---
and merged to branch_rx on r1306733
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241049#comment-13241049
]
Tommaso Teofili edited comment on SOLR-2983 at 3/29/12 7:31 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili updated SOLR-2983:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.6
Unable to load custom MergePolicy
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241052#comment-13241052
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
I read up enough on that issue to know I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili resolved SOLR-2983.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Unable to load custom MergePolicy
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241056#comment-13241056
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
bq. So you have to install ivy in your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241064#comment-13241064
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
{quote}
I personally don't like it when I need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastian L. updated LUCENE-3440:
-
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.5)
(was: 4.0)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241070#comment-13241070
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
{quote}
Again – can we make it project-wide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241074#comment-13241074
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
{quote}
Sure, but this introduces additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241083#comment-13241083
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
bq. Having jars in our source release is.
Is
Build failure running tests
You can see the entire build log at
http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1333007581.log
Summary of tests that failed...
./solr/build/solr-core/test/TEST-org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexConfigTest.xml
Thanks,
Charlie Cron (version 2.0-hossman-patched)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241084#comment-13241084
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
{quote}
Is a requirement that the source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241091#comment-13241091
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
Clear. It's a pity we have to deal with it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241094#comment-13241094
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
{quote}
FWIW i did a completley clean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241101#comment-13241101
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3293:
---
Let's explore this. I use request handler configs
Remove binary carrot2.jar and replace it with a maven dependency.
-
Key: SOLR-3294
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3294
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Task
Hmm I think something is broken with this test? its failed twice in a row...
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Charlie Cron hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com wrote:
Build failure running tests
You can see the entire build log at
http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1333010581.log
Summary of tests that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241107#comment-13241107
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3294:
---
Thanks for looking into this!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili reopened SOLR-2983:
---
SolrIndexConfigTest fails in 3x because the SolrIndexConfig constructor
prefix parameter cannot
Steven,
Thanks it works. The manual is absolutely awesome!
I run ant generate-maven-artifacts and mvn deploy then (with mvn
-Pbootstrap before).
Regards
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
** **
There is info on deploying to a maven repo
Residual IDF calculation in the pruning package is wrong
Key: LUCENE-3934
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3934
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241118#comment-13241118
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3914:
-
By fixing this: 'ant javadocs' from solr is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241120#comment-13241120
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3934:
-
This seems bad: Andrzej is this something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241121#comment-13241121
]
Per Steffensen commented on SOLR-3274:
--
Our performance test (with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili resolved SOLR-2983.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed issue with SolrIndexConfigTest in branch_3x
Unable
Optimize Kuromoji inner loop - rewrite ConnectionCosts.get() method
---
Key: LUCENE-3935
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241129#comment-13241129
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3935:
-
I agree, this should also help on RAM?
Build failure running tests
You can see the entire build log at
http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1333013101.log
Summary of tests that failed...
./solr/build/solr-core/test/TEST-org.apache.solr.update.SolrIndexConfigTest.xml
Thanks,
Charlie Cron (version 2.0-hossman-patched)
this is fixed in r1306768 (prefix parameter is no longer null), I assume it
takes some time to sync.
Tommaso
2012/3/29 Charlie Cron hudsonsevilt...@gmail.com
Build failure running tests
You can see the entire build log at
http://sierranevada.servebeer.com/1333013101.log
Summary of tests
this is a slow VM with only one cpu on a slow windows machine.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
this is fixed in r1306768 (prefix parameter is no longer null), I assume it
takes some time to sync.
Tommaso
2012/3/29 Charlie Cron
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241136#comment-13241136
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3930:
{quote}
For the unreleased jars, can we just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241139#comment-13241139
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
{quote}
A checkout of head and upgrade to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241141#comment-13241141
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
And for reference, the reason we used the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241157#comment-13241157
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
For git the revision md5 is unique and you can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated LUCENE-3930:
---
Attachment: noggit-commons-csv.patch
Patch which places noggit and commons csv under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241164#comment-13241164
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
I think its not ideal, but it nukes the jars,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241166#comment-13241166
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3935:
-
Ah, this brings back a small project that kind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241179#comment-13241179
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3930:
--
Ugh... We copied the source for commons-csv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241180#comment-13241180
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
{quote}
As i said on my email, given the
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-trunk/1808/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.TestDistributedSearch.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-731,5,]
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241185#comment-13241185
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3930:
I'm looking at changing how we handle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241186#comment-13241186
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3274:
---
If you don't solve the issue of the zk expirations,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12905/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.charfilter.HTMLStripCharFilterTest.testRandom
Error Message:
Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-8,5,]
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241248#comment-13241248
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-3293:
I suspected you would be interested in this issue,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241252#comment-13241252
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3930:
--
bq. if anyone else has a different opinion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241262#comment-13241262
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
Too late for this issue, because we are doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241267#comment-13241267
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3930:
--
Let's all please try to keep discussions
Rename StringIndexDocValues to DocTermsIndexDocValues
-
Key: LUCENE-3936
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3936
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241276#comment-13241276
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3930:
-
Moving C2 JARs out means we will have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3936:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3936.patch
Attached a patch.
Rename
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241286#comment-13241286
]
Nikola Tankovic commented on LUCENE-3312:
-
Hi folks,
I think this one could be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241289#comment-13241289
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-3029:
--
Yonik,
I can answer some of your questions. I do
I can reproduce this locally - I'm digging.
BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkRandomData() prints to standard error:
[junit] TEST FAIL: useCharFilter=true text='\#xff'
which is fantastic - very easy to see where to focus the search for problems.
Thanks Robert, Mike, and Dawid for all your work
I think this could be bogus? Looks from a stacktrace its failing on an
assume() from another thread?
You fixed this... but maybe we lost it in some cleanup?
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
I can reproduce this locally - I'm digging.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12906/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.miscellaneous.PatternAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
Uncaught exception by thread: Thread[Thread-56,5,]
Stack Trace:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241299#comment-13241299
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3029:
Thanks for the explanations! (and yeah, I had
This looks like a re-thrown (wrapped) failed assumption. Don't know
the logic of that test -- maybe it should be an assumption?
Dawid
Caused by: org.junit.internal.AssumptionViolatedException: failed
assumption: Test data cannot contain '\u' (Lucene 3.x only)
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Moen updated LUCENE-3935:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3935.patch
Optimize Kuromoji inner loop - rewrite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241303#comment-13241303
]
Reinardus Surya Pradhitya commented on LUCENE-3907:
---
Hi,
I'm
oh, i think i know the problem.
the 'help' basetokenstream gives here, that steve mentions, causes the problem.
I bet it catches and rethrows Throwable or something wrapped in a
RuntimeException?
But if its an assumptionViolatedException... it should ensure it doesnt wrap it!
On Thu, Mar 29,
the 'help' basetokenstream gives here, that steve mentions, causes the
problem.
I bet it catches and rethrows Throwable or something wrapped in a
RuntimeException?
That's what it looks like.
But if its an assumptionViolatedException... it should ensure it doesnt wrap
it!
There should
I'll take this one... I broke the ignore JVM bug logic in this test...
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12906/
1 tests
We should maybe add a utility method in lucene.util package (core), because
this is also often needed in Lucene core. Lots of code simply wraps needless by
RuntimeException. A good rethrow method should check with 2 instanceof checks
the rethrowable Exceptions and otherwise wrap with RuntimeEx:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241324#comment-13241324
]
Christian Moen commented on LUCENE-3935:
Thanks.
Robert has done a great job
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241327#comment-13241327
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3935:
---
+1, Robert and I already discussed about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241324#comment-13241324
]
Christian Moen edited comment on LUCENE-3935 at 3/29/12 3:51 PM:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
the 'help' basetokenstream gives here, that steve mentions, causes the
problem.
I bet it catches and rethrows Throwable or something wrapped in a
RuntimeException?
That's what it looks like.
But if its an
+1 for a utility method here...
Dawid's Rethrower class is sneaky :) Doesn't require wrapping as
RuntimeException ever...
But either approach is better than always wrapping in RuntimeException.
We need this in IOUtils methods too.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Mar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241328#comment-13241328
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3935:
+1
Optimize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241343#comment-13241343
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3935:
-
+1. If this is called very frequently and you
Dawid's Rethrower class is sneaky :) Doesn't require wrapping as
RuntimeException ever...
It's not mine, it's from here as far as I remember --
http://www.javapuzzlers.com/. I did a similar thing once for 1.4 by
editing .class file so that a method wasn't declaring a checked
exception, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241354#comment-13241354
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3312:
Hi Nikola,
I think this plus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241357#comment-13241357
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3907:
Awesome! We just need a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241359#comment-13241359
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3936:
+1
Rename
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241364#comment-13241364
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2000:
We now get a bunch of redundant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241366#comment-13241366
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2000:
---
We should fix this in trunk! I wanted to
Workaround the XERCES-J bug in Benchmark
Key: LUCENE-3937
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3937
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-3937:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3937.patch
Simple patch. Mike can you test this (by first replacing with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241386#comment-13241386
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3932:
I agree net/net that change is
HI,
I am using HighFreqTerms class to compute the high frequent terms in the
Lucene index and it works well. However, I am interested to compute the high
frequent terms under some condition. I would like to compute the high
frequent terms not for all documents in the index instead only for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241402#comment-13241402
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-3293:
---
My thought was a super-simple approach. A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241405#comment-13241405
]
Sean Bridges commented on LUCENE-3932:
--
I was doing tests on my local machine with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241413#comment-13241413
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-2000:
---
I just checked in a bunch of stuff... kept
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2000?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241417#comment-13241417
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2000:
Thanks Ryan!
You'd have to modify HighFreqTerm's sources...
Roughly...
First, make a bitset recording which docs are type A (eg, use
FieldCache), second, change HighFreqTerms so that for each term, it
walks the postings, counting how many type A docs there were, then...
just use the rest of HighFreqTerms
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:34 PM, r...@apache.org wrote:
Modified: lucene/dev/trunk/dev-tools/eclipse/dot.classpath
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/dev-tools/eclipse/dot.classpath?rev=1307012r1=1307011r2=1307012view=diff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241428#comment-13241428
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1591:
Note that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241438#comment-13241438
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3937:
LUCENE-1591 is when we first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241445#comment-13241445
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3937:
Note: I just run benchmark's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241447#comment-13241447
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3937:
-
I agree this is an awesome idea... maybe the
sorry -- I did that... previously, the benchmark|src/test were not
becoming source trees in eclipse
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:34 PM, r...@apache.org wrote:
Modified: lucene/dev/trunk/dev-tools/eclipse/dot.classpath
URL:
Yeah it looks jacked up. Maybe there is an easier way to do it in the
future so the tests work too... (Dawid has a way with eclipse...)
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry -- I did that... previously, the benchmark|src/test were not
becoming source
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241475#comment-13241475
]
Andrzej Bialecki edited comment on LUCENE-3934 at 3/29/12 6:21 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241475#comment-13241475
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-3934:
---
Eh, it's even worse - the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13241486#comment-13241486
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3937:
OK with this patch the decode of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Danny Dvinov updated SOLR-3039:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3039.patch
Refactored the previous change to be more generic to allow pre-processing
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/12908/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.miscellaneous.PatternAnalyzerTest.testRandomStrings
Error Message:
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 485
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
