[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Russell updated SOLR-2894:
Attachment: distributed_pivot.patch
facet_pivot will not show up in distrib search if no contents, r
Nagendra Nagarajayya created SOLR-3408:
--
Summary: org.apache.lucene.store.AlreadyClosedException:
MMapIndexInput already closed:
MMapIndexInput(path="/eneeds/fs/apache-solr-ra-4.0/example/solr/data/index/_5e9_0.frq")
Key: SO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261241#comment-13261241
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
You might be surprised by this, but I agre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261203#comment-13261203
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-3393:
Hoss, thanks for your comments.
Since I was the o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261197#comment-13261197
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3393:
bq. I will attempt to make a new O(1) cache called FastLFU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261159#comment-13261159
]
Erick Erickson edited comment on SOLR-3407 at 4/25/12 12:09 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261159#comment-13261159
]
Erick Erickson edited comment on SOLR-3407 at 4/25/12 12:08 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261159#comment-13261159
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-3407:
--
OK, but this means that perfectly valid schema
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261140#comment-13261140
]
David commented on SOLR-3406:
-
{quote}
There are already collectors in the grouping module that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261132#comment-13261132
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4020:
-
don't we need to also take care to still consu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261131#comment-13261131
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. http://evgeny-goldin.com/wiki/Ivy-maven-plugin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261118#comment-13261118
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
Re: maven-antivirus-plugin - looks like it's already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261113#comment-13261113
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
RE: maven-antivirus-plugin, as an experiment, I adde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4020:
Attachment: LUCENE-4020.diff
Ok, this time it's right.
> Tests may not be repeata
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261101#comment-13261101
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4020:
-
Oops, sorry, wrong thinking. It has to be the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4020:
Attachment: LUCENE-4020.diff
Suggested patch.
> Tests may not be repeatable acros
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4020:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-4020.diff)
> Tests may not be repeatable across different platfor
: > so we just changed the test to only test that the objects returned have
: > hte same rules.
:
: I think the test is better now because I don't think there is a
: guarantee all TimeZone implementations (and there is more than one...)
: need a consistent equals(). Who knows what else was lurkin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261098#comment-13261098
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-3393:
Further work, but no patch yet because it requires
: Since the last openjdk6,7 ports upgrades, the timezones update may
: change with every single FreeBSD update, because JDK timezone files are
: now a separate package shared across all ports. So it does not depend on
: the JDK version. Die to a bug in the openjdk port this is disabled for
: o
> the bottom line with that test is that on that machine, sometimes asking
> for "GMT-00" would return a diff object then asking for "GMT-00" again 2
> ms later -- same "rules" for the object, but a different String "id" value
Yes, a different ID, I noticed. It's strange.
> so we just changed the
: I think the problem with repeatability here may be this, Chris:
: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020
I agree that LUCENE-4020 is a problem, but honestly i don't think it has
anything to do with this particular bug -- the test never picks a random
timezone from the list of avail
I think the locale/ timezone used should be simply dumped as part of
repeat string. That array we pick from doesn't need to be sorted, it
can contain different entries depending on the JVM, etc.
D.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since the last openjdk6,7 ports u
Hi,
Since the last openjdk6,7 ports upgrades, the timezones update may change with
every single FreeBSD update, because JDK timezone files are now a separate
package shared across all ports. So it does not depend on the JDK version. Die
to a bug in the openjdk port this is disabled for openjdk6
I think the problem with repeatability here may be this, Chris:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020
The log on Jenkins for this seed says:
NOTE: test params are: codec=Lucene40: {},
sim=RandomSimilarityProvider(queryNorm=false,coord=false): {},
locale=th_TH_TH_#u-nu-thai, timezone=A
Before we start, I almost forgot, we need to make sure that it can actually
be ported into the project, according to ASF guidelines. I *think* it
should be okay, because it's licensed under the Apache 2.0 license, but we
should get some feedback from our mentors, on whether this is okay.
Stefan,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261075#comment-13261075
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4020:
-
I think the "reproduce with" line should expli
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-4020:
---
Summary: Tests may not be repeatable across different platforms/
JVMs due to different locale/ timezone being picked.
Key: LUCENE-4020
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2605.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 1330028.
> CoreAdminHandler,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261052#comment-13261052
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4016:
-
I'll check Ubuntu tomorrow. If anybody wants t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261043#comment-13261043
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. If you want to avoid jars in svn, you'll need my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261040#comment-13261040
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. Would it really be so bad if someone adds a mave
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261038#comment-13261038
]
David commented on SOLR-3406:
-
{quote}
Yes I am using group.truncate since facet.query doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261037#comment-13261037
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3407:
See the comment in the schema.xml:
{code}
{co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261032#comment-13261032
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
There is some work to do before you can 'c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261031#comment-13261031
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
{quote}
So then i can commit my patch, and we could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261030#comment-13261030
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-3406:
-
bq. I just realized that computi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261024#comment-13261024
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-3407:
--
This does NOT happen on 3.6, but DOES happen o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261023#comment-13261023
]
David commented on SOLR-2898:
-
ok sounds good
> Support grouped faceting
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4016:
Description:
Diff the outputs between ant 1.8.2 and ant 1.7.1.
{noformat}
Target Windows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261017#comment-13261017
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2898:
-
bq. At any rate I am new to Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261016#comment-13261016
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
So then i can commit my patch, and we could release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261012#comment-13261012
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
{quote}
If noggit is out there on central, then the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261008#comment-13261008
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4016:
-
We misunderstood each other. These package-inf
Chris Bleakley created SOLR-3407:
Summary: Field names with leading digits cause strange behavior
when used with "fl" param
Key: SOLR-3407
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3407
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261003#comment-13261003
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4016:
-
So that means if i have a package, with only a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4016:
Description:
Diff the outputs between ant 1.8.2 and ant 1.7.1.
{noformat}
Target Windows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260996#comment-13260996
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4016:
-
I only see "package-info.class" generated for
Thanks for your reply.
> Aside from the original port which had many divergences from java, the
> only other issue applied to spatial is LUCENENET-431, which would be easy
> to include.
>
>
That is not correct. LUCENENET-431 was committed, but some fixed from Java
Lucene 3.0.3 are in as well. Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260994#comment-13260994
]
Chris Russell commented on SOLR-2894:
-
I figured out the unit test. It's because facet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260892#comment-13260892
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
{quote}
Rob, my experience here is that you pose a v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260888#comment-13260888
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
Rob, my experience here is that you pose a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260889#comment-13260889
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4016:
-
{quote}
ant 1.8.x creates empty package-info.c
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13461/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 21720 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260885#comment-13260885
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
The issue goes much deeper. The issue also involves
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4016:
Description:
Diff the outputs between ant 1.8.2 and ant 1.7.1.
{noformat}
Target Windows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260879#comment-13260879
]
Benson Margulies edited comment on SOLR-3405 at 4/24/12 7:44 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260879#comment-13260879
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
Wait, who said "putting your war applicati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4016?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-4016:
Description:
Diff the output artifacts compared to what was produced by ant 1.7.
{noformat}
Target
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260878#comment-13260878
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. Lets either drop maven artifacts for solr comple
: All tests passed
javadoc typo ... fixed.
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13460/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 21722 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260866#comment-13260866
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
The binary release simply doesn't include any third
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260865#comment-13260865
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. there is no guava.jar in the binary package, nor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260865#comment-13260865
]
Steven Rowe edited comment on SOLR-3405 at 4/24/12 7:27 PM:
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260856#comment-13260856
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. It can't be: we release solr as an application o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260844#comment-13260844
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
Benson, but you cannot do this with the binary relea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260841#comment-13260841
]
Benson Margulies edited comment on SOLR-3405 at 4/24/12 7:08 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260840#comment-13260840
]
Ryan McKinley commented on SOLR-3405:
-
bq. it publishes it as if it were an _api_, not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260841#comment-13260841
]
Benson Margulies commented on SOLR-3405:
It might be helpful to note the following:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/2325/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testCustom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260832#comment-13260832
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
Well i think so, I mean the way maven publishes solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260831#comment-13260831
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. 2. with its "guts exposed" on maven
hmm, by "gu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260828#comment-13260828
]
Shawn Heisey edited comment on SOLR-3393 at 4/24/12 6:59 PM:
-
N
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-3393:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3393.patch
New patch that does not touch SolrInfoMBeanTest. I figured out what
Fast
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260825#comment-13260825
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. the fact that they are different I think is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260819#comment-13260819
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
Or just said another way, we are currently releasing
Robert Chapman ported Spatial to Lucene.NET, shown here in this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-199. DIGY only committed
the patch, and the only thing I've seen Prescott do was to
modify/apply LUCENENET-431 to trunk from 2.9.4g. Spatial, along with the
rest of Contrib, was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260814#comment-13260814
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
yeah: i mean we can look at this two ways:
1) that t
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13459/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3178?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260579#comment-13260579
]
Per Steffensen edited comment on SOLR-3178 at 4/24/12 6:38 PM:
--
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13458/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testCustom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260789#comment-13260789
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
bq. But the maven artifacts expose these inner detai
: Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13457/
: Error Message: GMT-00
:
expected:
: but
:
was:
This build contained my changes to "testCustom" in the same class that
explicitly called the exact same methods on "GMT-00"...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revi
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13457/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.Seed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David updated SOLR-3406:
Description: Need the ability to support grouped range and query facets.
Grouped facet fields have already been impl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260763#comment-13260763
]
David edited comment on SOLR-2898 at 4/24/12 6:03 PM:
--
I just realized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260763#comment-13260763
]
David commented on SOLR-2898:
-
I just realized that computing stats on an ungrouped docset stil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260762#comment-13260762
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3405:
---
I think the contribs are actually in our package (al
David created SOLR-3406:
---
Summary: Compute facet queries over grouped docsets
Key: SOLR-3406
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3406
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Repor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260754#comment-13260754
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-3405:
---
So under this proposal, which of these would NOT be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-3393:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3393.patch
Patch for new LFUCache implementation. It should be pretty close to O(1).
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13456/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.util.TimeZoneUtilsTest.testRandom
Error Message:
GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: GMT-00
expected:
but
was:
at
__randomizedtesting.
: FWIW: I can not reproduce this using hte specified seed...
Even when i added explicit checks for the input that the test complained
about ("GMT-00") i still can't reproduce ... but i'm using Java6 and i
don't have Java7.
I double checked the code, and i seriously don't understand how this
f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260742#comment-13260742
]
Per Steffensen commented on SOLR-3382:
--
See patch attached to SOLR-3178
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13260741#comment-13260741
]
Per Steffensen commented on SOLR-3173:
--
See patch attached to SOLR-3178
: The crazything: unless i have a serious bug in the test, both of those
: TimeZone objects came from calling TimeZone.getTimeZone("GMT-00") ... the
: only difference is that the "actual" call went through some string
: validation first to ensure it matcheda regex.
:
: spooky fucking shit.
FW
Uhm.. I was referring to the .NET port, which I can see DIGY ported
Nevermind I will get it from the original commit
@Prescott any idea re " CartesianPolyFilterBuilder.GetBoxShape() is not an
exact port - do you remember why? "?
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Christopher Currens <
currens.ch.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/13455/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.test
Error Message:
expected:<1> but was:<0>
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
at
__randomizedtesting.SeedIn
If it is known to be stable for actual use, we RavenDB dev team will update
to it in a branch and provide feedback. A -Pre nuget package released for
every RC can definitely help here.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Michael Herndon <
mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote:
> Do you all think we're
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
