[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477653#comment-13477653
]
Robert Tseng commented on SOLR-2155:
Hi All,
New to Solr here! I have a question for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477656#comment-13477656
]
Kristopher Davidsohn commented on SOLR-2155:
Hi,
I am no longer with the
Welcome, Alan!
koji
--
http://soleami.com/blog/starting-lab-work.html
(12/10/17 14:36), Robert Muir wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been contributing patches on various tricky stuff: positions
iterators, span queries,
Welcome Alan!
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been contributing patches on various tricky stuff: positions
iterators, span queries, highlighters, codecs, and
Congratulations, Alan! Welcome! And thanks for the cool work!
Best wishes,
Christian
http://www.atilika.com (new)
On Oct 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been
Welcome Alan :)
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Christian Moen wrote:
Congratulations, Alan! Welcome! And thanks for the cool work!
Best wishes,
Christian
http://www.atilika.com (new)
On Oct 17, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com
(mailto:rcm...@gmail.com)
welcome alan!
hope you get back into position interators soon :)
simon
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Stefan Matheis
matheis.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome Alan :)
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Christian Moen wrote:
Congratulations, Alan! Welcome! And thanks for the cool
Welcome to the team, Alan.
Dawid
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been contributing patches on various tricky stuff: positions
iterators, span queries,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x/16/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 30474 lines...]
prepare-release-no-sign:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x/lucene/build/fakeRelease
[copy] Copying 381
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-4486:
---
Summary: Highlighter doesn't support ConstantScoreQuery
Key: LUCENE-4486
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4486
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-4486:
Attachment: LUCENE-4486.patch
here is a patch incl. test changes entry
Thanks Robert.
I'm a developer based in Cambridge, UK, and have been working on search engines
for 10 years or so. Up until a couple of years ago I was mainly using
closed-source implementations, and discovering lucene/solr was a breath of
fresh air (you can see the code! you can fix bugs
Welcome Alan!
On 17 October 2012 10:04, Alan Woodward
alan.woodw...@romseysoftware.co.uk wrote:
Thanks Robert.
I'm a developer based in Cambridge, UK, and have been working on search
engines for 10 years or so. Up until a couple of years ago I was mainly
using closed-source
Welcome, Alan!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-4479:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.1
TokenSources.getTokenStream() doesn't return
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-4479:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-4479.patch
New patch, with CHANGES entry. Could someone cast a quick eye
Welcome aboard Alan!
Happy Coding,
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been contributing patches on various tricky
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477791#comment-13477791
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4486:
+1
Highlighter
I committed a fix.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-4.x/16/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 30474 lines...]
Robert:
It's much better to ask usage questions like this on the user's list
rather than in a
comment on a JIRA, the user's list gets seen by a much wider audience. See
the solr-user section here: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/discussion.html
Quick answers:
1 you're better off chunking things
Welcome aboard Alan!
FWIW, Alan and I used to work for the same company, although on opposite
sides of the Atlantic although we did meet a few times. We had a memorable
lesson in how well closed-source code was supported... especially when the
company in question is purchased.
Erick
On Wed, Oct
Welcome Alan!
Alan Woodward alan.woodw...@romseysoftware.co.uk wrote:
Thanks Robert.
I'm a developer based in Cambridge, UK, and have been working on search engines
for 10 years or so. Up until a couple of years ago I was mainly using
closed-source implementations, and discovering
Anthony Mckale created LUCENE-4487:
--
Summary: SpellChecker : SpellChecker.indexDictionary : Javadoc
incorrect
Key: LUCENE-4487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4487
Project: Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Mckale updated LUCENE-4487:
---
Description:
example code in javadoc seems to be incorrect
code changes from LUCENE-3557
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Mckale updated LUCENE-4487:
---
Description:
example code in javadoc seems to be incorrect
code changes from LUCENE-3557
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477818#comment-13477818
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-4487:
-
this makes lots of sense! can you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-4486:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Highlighter doesn't support ConstantScoreQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-4486.
-
Resolution: Fixed
committed to trunk in revision 1399205.
backported to 4.x in revision
Here's the page that tells you how to get the source:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
for Subversion, it's simple:
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x
or
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk
then make your changes and at
Welcome Alan! You've been improving challenging parts of Lucene.
~ David
-
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/apache-solr-3-enterprise-search-server/book
--
View this message in context:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477847#comment-13477847
]
Ahmet Arslan commented on LUCENE-4486:
--
I am wondering about if it is possible to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477893#comment-13477893
]
Anthony Mckale commented on LUCENE-4487:
was trying to check out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477898#comment-13477898
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-3939:
--
So that was the difference between the initial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477906#comment-13477906
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-3939:
---
I'm not sure - I'd have to think about it. Could be
Welcome Alan!
On Oct 17, 2012, at 1:36 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been contributing patches on various tricky stuff: positions
iterators, span queries, highlighters, codecs, and so
Congrats and welcome, Alan!
-Yonik
http://lucidworks.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been contributing patches on various tricky stuff: positions
Cool!
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Anthony Mckale (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477893#comment-13477893
]
Anthony Mckale commented on
Nathan Visagan created SOLR-3960:
Summary: Searching: PostFilter plugins ignored by solr cloud
Key: SOLR-3960
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3960
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Visagan updated SOLR-3960:
-
Description:
When specifying the cloud options (-DzkRun -DnumShards=n) solr query does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nathan Visagan updated SOLR-3960:
-
Description:
When specifying the cloud options (-DzkRun -DnumShards=n) in solr startup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13477990#comment-13477990
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4479:
-
with the current patch, 'ant precommit' fails:
Also: we can fix TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash to *not* dump everytime.
Currently when it calls fork() it passes all of your -D's, -X's, etc.
it could just intentionally not pass this one to its child process:
replaceAll(-Xwhatevertheheapdumpoptionis,)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Michael
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Also: we can fix TestIndexWriterOnJRECrash to *not* dump everytime.
Currently when it calls fork() it passes all of your -D's, -X's, etc.
it could just intentionally not pass this one to its child process:
Michael McCandless created LUCENE-4488:
--
Summary: Jenkins builds aren't saving heap dumps anymore
Key: LUCENE-4488
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4488
Project: Lucene - Core
OK I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4488
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Also: we can fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478026#comment-13478026
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-4488:
-
+1!
Jenkins builds aren't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478050#comment-13478050
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4488:
---
The title is not completely correct: The
I'm not able to reproduce this one at the moment, i only have mac (no
java7). I even tried tacking on -Dtests.jvms=1 -Dtests.dups=20 in case
its a testrunner leak (this one makes lots of threads).
Is anyone else able to reproduce this?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:21 PM, buil...@flonkings.com
java7). I even tried tacking on -Dtests.jvms=1 -Dtests.dups=20 in case
its a testrunner leak (this one makes lots of threads).
Shouldn't be the runner's problem anymore (I fixed the previous
issue). Although proving me wrong by showing an example (heapdump)
will make me change my opinion of
Looks very similar ... I'll put this failure on the issue ...
Scary to trip that assert though!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this is really https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4182 ?
It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478070#comment-13478070
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4182:
This happened again ... scary
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
java7). I even tried tacking on -Dtests.jvms=1 -Dtests.dups=20 in case
its a testrunner leak (this one makes lots of threads).
Shouldn't be the runner's problem anymore (I fixed the previous
issue). Although
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478081#comment-13478081
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-3939:
Mark I were chatting a little about this. The
Congratulations and welcome, Alan.
Otis
--
Search Analytics - http://sematext.com/search-analytics/index.html
Performance Monitoring - http://sematext.com/spm/index.html
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478095#comment-13478095
]
Dana Cohen commented on SOLR-3814:
--
this is still an issue for me. i can reproduce the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-4182:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
DocumentsWriterFlushControl.assertMemory tripped by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478226#comment-13478226
]
Dana Cohen commented on SOLR-3743:
--
this is still an issue for me. i can reproduce the
Hello,
Please check with the below requirement, If you feel comfort send me your
updated resume to sa...@sriusa.com.
Position: Java with lucene
Location: San Jose, CA
Duration: Long term contract
Job description:
7 to 10 yrs experience
Lucene search experience, Includes knowledge of Lucene
repros if I use randomized runner but not if I use JUnit's runner.
Maybe it's close enough to the memory limit to be a non-significant
difference? You could try decreasing memory to see when JUnit's runner
starts failing for the same seed.
There's some overhead of using randomized runner but I
Just a though -- we have a benchmark regression test that attempts to
estimate the 'minimum required memory before it hits an OOM' for a
known task (a fixed data set for clustering). Essentially we do a
binary search between not hitting an OOM and hitting an OOM. What this
brings us is that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478249#comment-13478249
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3960:
Nathan: just to clarify, you said...
bq. When specifying
Hoss Man created SOLR-3961:
--
Summary: LimitTokenCountFilterFactory config parsing is totally
broken
Key: SOLR-3961
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3961
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478256#comment-13478256
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-3961:
From the list...
{noformat}
I read the following in the
KuroSaka TeruHiko created SOLR-3962:
---
Summary: For the match-all-docs query *:*, (e)dismax parser passes
*:* to tokenizer. Under certain conditions, hit suboptimal (1.0) score is
reported.
Key: SOLR-3962
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-3961:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3961.patch
i modified one of the test schemas to include LImitTOkenCountFilterFactory to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478318#comment-13478318
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3961:
---
For testing LimitTokenCountFilter, you need to set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478333#comment-13478333
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-3939:
--
Curious as to what the procedure is when the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478386#comment-13478386
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-3939:
--
Actually just tested, and it's a problem when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-3961:
---
Attachment: SOLR-3961.patch
Thanks rmuir, setEnableChecks is the piece i was missing and using it makes the
I notice that the CHANGES.txt files on the lucene_solr_4_0 doesn't yet
have a section for 4.0.1 bug fixes even though it looks like there have
been some bug fix commits on that branch since 4.0.0 was released.
On the other hand it looks like some folks (maybe just miller?) have been
using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478487#comment-13478487
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-3961:
---
{quote}
HunspellStemFilterTest is the only
Hoss Man created LUCENE-4489:
Summary: improve LimitTokenCountFilter and/or it's tests
Key: LUCENE-4489
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4489
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-3961:
---
Fix Version/s: 5.0
I spun off LUCENE-4489 for some of the remaining questions about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478494#comment-13478494
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-4489:
--
In SOLR-3961 rmuir and i were discussing the tests
Welcome, Alan!
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
17. okt. 2012 kl. 07:36 skrev Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted Alan as a
Lucene/Solr committer.
Alan has been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-4489:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-4489.patch
here's a quick patch i tried to throw together to demonstrate what i had
I think we should just add a CHANGES section for 4.0.1?
There are 2 commits actually that Stefan made that should be moved
under this section: I felt like i intended to do this (create 4.0.1
section and move them), but I think I forgot.
In the past these branches (e.g. lucene_solr_3_6) have been
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2305?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478574#comment-13478574
]
Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2305:
--
Not quite. That's usually just a marker that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley resolved LUCENE-4464.
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Lucene Fields: New,Patch Available (was: New)
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4489:
Attachment: LUCENE-4489.patch
Some combination of the above, attached is an updated patch:
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-4489:
Attachment: LUCENE-4489.patch
same patch as the above, just passing null in the test for
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-trunk/24/
No tests ran.
Build Log:
[...truncated 30393 lines...]
prepare-release-no-sign:
[mkdir] Created dir:
/usr/home/hudson/hudson-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-trunk/lucene/build/fakeRelease
[copy] Copying
Bill Bell created SOLR-3963:
---
Summary: SOLR: map() does not allow passing recip() sub-functions
Key: SOLR-3963
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3963
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478700#comment-13478700
]
Bill Bell commented on LUCENE-4450:
---
+1
Distance boost added to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13478706#comment-13478706
]
Bill Bell commented on LUCENE-4450:
---
Sudarshan,
How would you boost by geodistance
85 matches
Mail list logo
