[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925483#comment-13925483
]
Vishmi Money commented on LUCENE-5422:
--
I'm sharing the draft of my proposal with
Martijn van Groningen created LUCENE-5515:
-
Summary: Improve TopDocs#merge for pagination
Key: LUCENE-5515
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5515
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-5515:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-5515.patch
Patch that includes the change to only create a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925516#comment-13925516
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5495:
---
bq. Some Filter implementations produce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925517#comment-13925517
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5495:
---
I checked the Facet filters. Those violate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-5314.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Superseded by LUCENE-5493.
Decide on whether the central class of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishmi Money updated LUCENE-5422:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: I'm sharing the draft of my proposal with you. I will be grateful if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925563#comment-13925563
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5762:
--
bq.When I use a Solrj version greater than 4.5.1 and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925564#comment-13925564
]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-5762 at 3/10/14 8:41 AM:
---
Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925564#comment-13925564
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-5762:
--
Solr behaves a lot like a web container where the
@Furkan,
thanks for sharing your thoughts and giving insights. I am happy that
you agree that we should move to Java 1.7 even if you had the trouble
with your legacy code. That is the right way to go here!
Regarding the vote:
+1 for moving to Java 1.7 on 4.x
-1 for moving to Java 8 on trunk I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925569#comment-13925569
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5501:
-
Commit
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/9740/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b07 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.CloudSolrServerTest.testDistribSearch
Error Message:
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Could not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated SOLR-5265:
Attachment: SOLR-5265.patch
New Patch.
- Need to apply the patch for SOLR-5837
- Commented out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925582#comment-13925582
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-5501:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925596#comment-13925596
]
Markus Jelsma commented on SOLR-1632:
-
Hi Vitaly, are you sure it still works? I tried
Hi,
it looks like we all agree on the same:
+1 for Lucene 4.x requirement on Java 7.
-1 to not change trunk (keep it on Java 7,too).
I will keep this vote open until this evening, but I don't expect any other
change. Indeed, there are no real technical reasons to not move.
I was expecting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925607#comment-13925607
]
Manuel Lenormand commented on SOLR-5501:
Hi [~noble.paul], I need an advice for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5514:
--
Labels: Java7 (was: )
Backport Java 7 changes from trunk to Lucene 4.8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5514:
--
Description:
This issue tracks the backporting of various issues that are related to Java 7
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Da Huang dhuang...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks a lot. That's very helpful.
I think you get exactly what I mean about the LUCENE-4396.
By grouping up the MUST clauses, the conjunctive query can be
done specifiedly with easy way. Then, the original query would have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5514:
--
Component/s: general/build
Backport Java 7 changes from trunk to Lucene 4.8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925623#comment-13925623
]
Furkan KAMACI commented on SOLR-5762:
-
bq. If this is true please open a ticket
Yes of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925625#comment-13925625
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5837:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Debray updated SOLR-5127:
Attachment: highlight-wildcards.patch
I have implemented this issue. Wildcard fields that have been
Furkan KAMACI created SOLR-5844:
---
Summary: Backward Compatibility Has Broken For deleteById() at
Solrj
Key: SOLR-5844
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5844
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925630#comment-13925630
]
Furkan KAMACI commented on SOLR-5844:
-
This issue may related to SOLR-5762.
Backward
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925631#comment-13925631
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5837:
---
Commit
Simon Willnauer created LUCENE-5516:
---
Summary: Forward information that trigger a merge to MergeScheduler
Key: LUCENE-5516
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516
Project: Lucene -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925632#comment-13925632
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5506:
Hmm, these do look bad, but I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-5516:
Attachment: LUCENE-5516.patch
here is a patch
Forward information that trigger a merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-5516:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
Forward information that trigger a merge to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated SOLR-5265:
Attachment: javabin_backcompat.bin
SOLR-5265.patch
Same patch but attaching the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925641#comment-13925641
]
Paco Garcia commented on SOLR-5517:
---
Hi,
maybe that with this change you can´t abort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925642#comment-13925642
]
Furkan KAMACI commented on LUCENE-5506:
---
[~mikemccand] I'll check the test case.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-5514:
--
Description:
This issue tracks the backporting of various issues that are related to Java 7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul resolved SOLR-5837.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Noble Paul (was: Mark Miller)
Add missing equals implementation for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand resolved LUCENE-5501.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.8
Thanks for reviewing, Mike!
Out-of-order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul reassigned SOLR-5265:
Assignee: Noble Paul
Add backward compatibility tests to JavaBinCodec's format.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925676#comment-13925676
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5495:
Unfortunately, it's intentional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925680#comment-13925680
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-5351:
---
the problem to me is not (only) on the Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-5487:
---
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.8
I think this (Weight.scorer) is an expert
Hi I wanted to subscribe to this mailing list and wanted to contribute in
development of lucene.
--
Regards,
Abhishek Shah
Its too sad this decision isn't about what is best for attracting new
developers, but instead corrupted by corporate policies around JVM
versions and the like.
what a shame, open source isn't supposed to be like that.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
Francesco Croci created SOLR-5845:
-
Summary: File locked afetr indexing
Key: SOLR-5845
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5845
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
Hi Abhishek,
Since you send this e-mail, you are successfully subscribed to dev list.
Please see the how to contribute wiki pages
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/HowToContribute
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
Welcome and happy hacking,
Ahmet
On Monday, March 10, 2014 1:56
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Croci updated SOLR-5845:
--
Summary: File locked after indexing (was: File locked afetr indexing)
File locked after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925695#comment-13925695
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5513:
[~mkhludnev], great that you want to take a
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi,
it looks like we all agree on the same:
+1 for Lucene 4.x requirement on Java 7.
-1 to not change trunk (keep it on Java 7,too).
I will keep this vote open until this evening, but I don't expect any other
change.
+1 for 4.x on Java7
-0 for rushing trunk to 8 now
Rob, in my view, what's best for Lucene as a project is tightly linked to
what's best for its users. And the users tend do be corporate. I think users
are so important that we should even consider rolling a bugfix-release from the
4.7 branch
I tend to think Java 8 still requires a fair share of testing before
it'll make it to production... Check out this recent marvel :)
http://marc.info/?l=openjdk-compiler-devm=139410546908373w=2
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
+1 for 4.x on Java7
-0 for
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Rob, in my view, what's best for Lucene as a project is tightly linked to
what's best for its users. And the users tend do be corporate. I think users
are so important that we should even consider rolling a
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
When making votes like this, please do what you think is best for the
open source project, instead of what you think is best for your
corporation.
Also, please show respect for the opinions of others. If they happen
to
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.com wrote:
Also, please show respect for the opinions of others. If they happen
to disagree with you,
do not assume it's crap and driven by corporate interests.
No assumptions had to be made. it was explicitly worded in the
Hi Robert,
the vote must be held open for 72 hours. I haven't even had a chance to
formulate my VOTE+reasoning yet, and i dont agree with this crap here.
Indeed, there is no need to hurry! I just wanted more discussions coming in.
The merges I prepared already are stable and pass all tests,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925713#comment-13925713
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5487:
-
{quote}
I think this (Weight.scorer) is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925714#comment-13925714
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5265:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925717#comment-13925717
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5487:
---
I think we can backport this!
Can we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925718#comment-13925718
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-5475:
-
I've just released RR 2.1.0 which contains a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925722#comment-13925722
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5265:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925724#comment-13925724
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5512:
-
{quote}
I've finished it. Compilation and
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
I agree with you: trunk is our development branch, I see no problem with
making it Java 8 only. From the other issue, we have no important news to
actually release this as 5.0 soon, so we can for sure play with it for long
Hmmm, scanning just Noble's comment it's even worse since we have custom
components that may define their own params that other components know
nothing about (and can't).
But I'm glancing at this out of context so may be off in the weeds.
On Mar 10, 2014 4:41 AM, Noble Paul (JIRA) j...@apache.org
Solr/Lucene 4.8 - Java 7
+1
I'm not too sure about moving trunk to java 8 . Let's keep it at java 7 and
make a call when we are closer to Lecene-Solr 5.0. Organizations move to
newer versions of java very slowly.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925725#comment-13925725
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-5475:
-
Thanks Dawid!
add required attribute bugUrl
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-MacOSX/1398/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0-fcs -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.core.TestNonNRTOpen.testReaderIsNotNRT
Error Message:
SOLR-5815? : wrong maxDoc:
I agree with you on the fact that we should always try to innovate.
Moving to Java8 is innovation and we should do it rather sooner than
later. I just don't think we should move there right before it's even
released. I can totally see this vote coming in in a couple of month
once we have fixed the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925730#comment-13925730
]
Furkan KAMACI commented on LUCENE-5512:
---
I'm running tests for Lucene for last
Dawid: Boy, those are some large timeouts!
Mike: The build.properties suggestion resolved my issue. I can now run the
test to completion.
On a Mid 2009 MacBook Pro running Mavericks and using Java 6 executing ant
from the top level of the lucene-solr project I get the following timings:
ant
Oops, the second set of timings on the Mid 2012 MacBook Pro were for JUST
the solr tests.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Terry Smith sheb...@gmail.com wrote:
Dawid: Boy, those are some large timeouts!
Mike: The build.properties suggestion resolved my issue. I can now run the
test to
In my experience, the test suite is much faster on an SSD. Around 18
minutes on my mac book pro and 12 minutes on my PC for just the Solr
tests with -Dtests.slow=true (both have SSDs)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Terry Smith sheb...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops, the second set of timings on the Mid
Shalin: That makes sense. Both the machines I used for testing have SSDs.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
In my experience, the test suite is much faster on an SSD. Around 18
minutes on my mac book pro and 12 minutes on my PC for just the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul reassigned SOLR-5844:
Assignee: Noble Paul
Backward Compatibility Has Broken For deleteById() at Solrj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Furkan KAMACI updated LUCENE-5512:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-5512.patch
Lucene part is OK. I will appy same procedure to the Solr
Hi Yonik,
Excuse me? I assume that's aimed at me?
No, that was not aimed at you. It was a general comment. There are many
examples of companies /users that fork trunk. Lucid Imagination was one of them
(the product LucidWorks was initially based on trunk, as far as I remember).
Also P.S.
[.] Move Lucene/Solr 4.8 (means branch_4x) to Java 7 and backport all Java
7-related issues (FileChannel improvements, diamond operator,...).
+1
[.] Move Lucene/Solr trunk to Java 8 and allow closures in source code.
This would make some APIs much nicer. Our infrastructure mostly supports
this,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925768#comment-13925768
]
Brett Lucey commented on SOLR-2894:
---
Elran - Can you give me an example test case or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925787#comment-13925787
]
Elran Dvir commented on SOLR-2894:
--
Hi,
I don't know where I should exactly put the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Rowe updated SOLR-5653:
-
Attachment: SOLR-5653.patch
Patch, building on Tim's patch.
Left to do:
* init args should be moved to
Elran Dvir created SOLR-5846:
Summary: EnumField docValues funtionality
Key: SOLR-5846
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5846
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Elran Dvir updated SOLR-5846:
-
Attachment: SOLR-5846.patch
EnumField docValues funtionality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man reopened SOLR-5783:
* I'm not really understanding Yonik's alternative suggestion, but i don't have
the code in front of me -- if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925849#comment-13925849
]
Paco Garcia commented on SOLR-5517:
---
Quick hack:
go to:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925849#comment-13925849
]
Paco Garcia edited comment on SOLR-5517 at 3/10/14 4:26 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925856#comment-13925856
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-5515:
+1
It's nice that ElasticSearch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili reassigned SOLR-5827:
-
Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
Add boosting functionality to MoreLikeThisHandler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925869#comment-13925869
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-5517:
-
Hi,
can you open a new issue to fix the Admin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925869#comment-13925869
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-5517 at 3/10/14 4:38 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925873#comment-13925873
]
Vishmi Money commented on LUCENE-5422:
--
I'm sharing the draft of my proposal with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925878#comment-13925878
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-5783:
bq. I'm not really in a position to commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925883#comment-13925883
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on SOLR-5827:
---
Having had a look at the patch and it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925884#comment-13925884
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5837:
---
Yonik's comment still needs to be addressed - the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reopened SOLR-5837:
---
Add missing equals implementation for SolrDocument, SolrInputDocument and
SolrInputField.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925887#comment-13925887
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5837:
---
The following also should be addressed:
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned SOLR-5837:
-
Assignee: Mark Miller (was: Noble Paul)
Add missing equals implementation for SolrDocument,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925890#comment-13925890
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-5800:
-
[~tim.potter] did you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925900#comment-13925900
]
Furkan KAMACI commented on LUCENE-5512:
---
Solr module is OK. I will test it and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925904#comment-13925904
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5837:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13925908#comment-13925908
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5837:
---
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved SOLR-5837.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Add missing equals implementation for SolrDocument, SolrInputDocument and
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
