[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master - Build # 1260 - Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/1260/ 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates.test_dv Error Message: java.lang.RuntimeException: Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:54642/solr/test_col: Async exception during

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 721 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/721/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.DocValuesNotIndexedTest.testGroupingDocAbsent Error Message: Did not find the expected number of groups for field longGSF

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10255) Large psuedo-stored fields via BinaryDocValuesField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906431#comment-15906431 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10255: - I think I want to scale back the scope of what I plan to do in

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7737) Remove spatial-extras dependency on queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906430#comment-15906430 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7737: -- Yes; bringing back some form of "explain" can be in another

Re: Release 6.5

+1 On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 7:28 PM Joel Bernstein wrote: > +1 > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:43 PM, jim ferenczi > wrote: > > Hi, > We have a lot of great improvements coming in 6.5 so I'd like to

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-4698) Overhaul ShapeFieldCache because its a memory pig

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley closed LUCENE-4698. Resolution: Won't Fix I think LatLonDocValuesField (currently in sandbox) is currently the optimal

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-5170) Spatial multi-value distance sort via DocValues

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley closed SOLR-5170. -- Resolution: Won't Fix > Spatial multi-value distance sort via DocValues >

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10039) LatLonPointSpatialField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Smiley resolved SOLR-10039. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 6.5 > LatLonPointSpatialField > --- >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10039) LatLonPointSpatialField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906419#comment-15906419 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10039: Commit

Re: Release 6.5

+1 Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:43 PM, jim ferenczi wrote: > Hi, > We have a lot of great improvements coming in 6.5 so I'd like to volunteer > for a new release. I can cut the branch around march 17th in order to let > some

Dealing with issues reported by Findbugs

Hi all, I started fixing code issues reported by Findbugs; right now it is reporting 4000+ issues in lucene/solr repository. I could use some guidance: 1) Will one JIRA issue be sufficient to cover all Findbugs-related items, or should I raise separate items for distinct problems reported by

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10039) LatLonPointSpatialField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906393#comment-15906393 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10039: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906383#comment-15906383 ] Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-7738: I opened LUCENE-7740 to refactor class names and move

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906384#comment-15906384 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7738: -- Actually can you remove the {{e.printStackTrace()}} call in

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906385#comment-15906385 ] Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-7738: +1 > Add new InetAddressRangeField >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906384#comment-15906384 ] Adrien Grand edited comment on LUCENE-7738 at 3/12/17 1:00 AM: --- Actually

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7740) Refactor Range Fields and graduate from sandbox

Nicholas Knize created LUCENE-7740: -- Summary: Refactor Range Fields and graduate from sandbox Key: LUCENE-7740 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7740 Project: Lucene - Core

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10265) Overseer can become the bottleneck in very large clusters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906381#comment-15906381 ] Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-10265 at 3/12/17 12:57 AM: - bq.I haven't

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10265) Overseer can become the bottleneck in very large clusters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906381#comment-15906381 ] Noble Paul commented on SOLR-10265: --- bq.I haven't debugged why the transaction logs ran into terabytes

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906380#comment-15906380 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7738: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906379#comment-15906379 ] Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-7738: -- +1 to the patch +1 to removing the "Field" suffix from range

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7449) Add CROSSES query support to RangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906377#comment-15906377 ] Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-7449: Thanks [~steve_rowe] and sorry for the delay. I've

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906378#comment-15906378 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7738: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7449) Add CROSSES query support to RangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906375#comment-15906375 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7449: - Commit

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7449) Add CROSSES query support to RangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906374#comment-15906374 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7449: - Commit

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 19147 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19147/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -server -XX:+UseG1GC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.TestSolrCloudWithSecureImpersonation Error Message: 1 thread leaked from SUITE scope at

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-6736) A collections-like request handler to manage solr configurations on zookeeper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ishan Chattopadhyaya updated SOLR-6736: --- Attachment: newzkconf.zip SOLR-6736.patch Initial patch based on my

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 773 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows/773/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.testCollectionsAPI Error Message: Error from server at

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906343#comment-15906343 ] David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7738: -- RE naming; some consistency is good. So if the non-range

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7739) Issues reported by FindBugs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Jelinski updated LUCENE-7739: Attachment: LUCENE-7739.patch Patch to address "boxing/unboxing to parse a primitive";

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7739) Issues reported by FindBugs

Daniel Jelinski created LUCENE-7739: --- Summary: Issues reported by FindBugs Key: LUCENE-7739 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7739 Project: Lucene - Core Issue Type:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x - Build # 782 - Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.x/782/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.LeaderFailoverAfterPartitionTest.test Error Message: Expected 2 of 3 replicas to be active but only found 1;

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8045) Deploy V2 API at /v2 instead of /solr/v2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906292#comment-15906292 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8045: -- Same (looking) failure on master

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-master - Build # 723 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-master/723/ No tests ran. Build Log: [...truncated 39749 lines...] prepare-release-no-sign: [mkdir] Created dir: /x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-master/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/dist [copy]

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-8045) Deploy V2 API at /v2 instead of /solr/v2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906282#comment-15906282 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8045: -- ASF Jenkins has a smoke tester failure after this issue's branch_6x

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7738) Add new InetAddressRangeField

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906274#comment-15906274 ] Nicholas Knize commented on LUCENE-7738: Thanks [~dsmiley]! I have no problem putting both

Release 6.5

Hi, We have a lot of great improvements coming in 6.5 so I'd like to volunteer for a new release. I can cut the branch around march 17th in order to let some time for devs to finish the current issues. What do you think?

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10079) TestInPlaceUpdates(Distrib|Standalone) failures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906261#comment-15906261 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-10079: --- This branch_6x failure from ASF Jenkins

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10079) TestInPlaceUpdates(Distrib|Standalone) failures

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906257#comment-15906257 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-10079: --- Non-reproducing failure for {{TestStressInplaceUpdates}}, from my

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10265) Overseer can become the bottleneck in very large clusters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906245#comment-15906245 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-10265: - Side comment, need its own issue if we decide to pursue. Only

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10265) Overseer can become the bottleneck in very large clusters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15906241#comment-15906241 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-10265: --- Trying to think a little OOB here: > Is there any way to

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-6187) explore symmetic docvalues pull API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-6187. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: master (7.0) This was done with the switch

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5966) How to migrate from numeric fields to auto-prefix terms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-5966. Resolution: Won't Fix We removed auto prefix terms ... > How to migrate from

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-6.x - Build # 283 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-6.x/283/ No tests ran. Build Log: [...truncated 39758 lines...] prepare-release-no-sign: [mkdir] Created dir: /x1/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Lucene-Solr-SmokeRelease-6.x/lucene/build/smokeTestRelease/dist [copy] Copying

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+159) - Build # 19143 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19143/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+159 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.util.TestSolrCLIRunExample Error Message: ObjectTracker found 6 object(s) that were not released!!!

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x - Build # 305 - Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-6.x/305/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.update.TestInPlaceUpdatesStandalone.testUpdatingDocValues Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError at

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5069) Can/should we store NumericField's precisionStep in the index?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-5069. Resolution: Won't Fix We moved to dimensional points for storing inverted numeric

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-5712) Remove Similarity.queryNorm

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-5712. Resolution: Fixed Duplicate of LUCENE-7368, yay. > Remove Similarity.queryNorm >

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 29 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Windows/29/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandlerBackup.doTestBackup Error Message:

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+159) - Build # 173 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.4-Linux/173/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+159 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.ShardSplitTest.testSplitAfterFailedSplit Error Message: expected:<1> but was:<2> Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1>

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-master - Build # 1722 - Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-master/1722/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestSolrCloudWithDelegationTokens.testDelegationTokenRenew Error Message: expected:<200> but was:<403> Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<200> but was:<403>

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 1186 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Solaris/1186/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not