[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3961 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3961/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 6 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CustomCollectionTest.testCreateShardRepFactor Error Message: Error from server at http://127.0.0.1:56609/solr: Could

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 3322 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/3322/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -server -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC 3 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SaslZkACLProviderTest Error Message: 6 threads leaked from SUITE scope at

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-master - Build # 1776 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-master/1776/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SolrCloudExampleTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not released!!! [MockDirectoryWrapper, MockDirectoryWrapper, TransactionLog,

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 19436 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19436/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.util.TestSolrCLIRunExample Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not released!!!

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 846 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows/846/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.MissingSegmentRecoveryTest.testLeaderRecovery Error Message: Expected a collection with one shard and two replicas

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15976029#comment-15976029 ] Kensho Hirasawa commented on SOLR-10528: I guess it is possible to avoid numeric boxing by

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10433) switch between v2 and v1 endpoints internally in SolrJ

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cao Manh Dat updated SOLR-10433: Attachment: SOLR-10433.patch Here are my strategy to accomplish this ticket. It uses code from

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.5 - Build # 24 - Failure

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-6.5/24/ All tests passed Build Log: [...truncated 68482 lines...] -ecj-javadoc-lint-tests: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/ecj707405448 [ecj-lint] Compiling 772 source files to /tmp/ecj707405448 [ecj-lint] invalid Class-Path header in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975917#comment-15975917 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-10528: - Thanks Kensho! On first glance, it looks like there is numeric

[JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk-9-ea+164) - Build # 19435 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19435/ Java: 32bit/jdk-9-ea+164 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.admin.MetricsHandlerTest.testPropertyFilter Error Message: Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError at

Should we stop being able to create CoreDescriptors from a Map?

While working on SOLR-10493 my mental model was that the CoreDescriptors should not be possible to create without a core.properties file. Of course that's not the case, all you have to do is pass properties to the CoreDescriptor c'tor. In fact, CorePropertiesLocator reads the core.properties file

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975849#comment-15975849 ] Kensho Hirasawa commented on SOLR-10528: Yonik, Thanks for the comment. In the first patch, I

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10396) Implement trigger support for nodeLost event type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Cao Manh Dat resolved SOLR-10396. - Resolution: Fixed > Implement trigger support for nodeLost event type >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10396) Implement trigger support for nodeLost event type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975832#comment-15975832 ] Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-10396: - Thanks [~shalinmangar] for review the patch. Committed to

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kensho Hirasawa updated SOLR-10528: --- Attachment: SOLR-10528.patch Attached the first patch. This patch is for branch_6x. I have

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975826#comment-15975826 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-10528: - Yep, we should definitely do this. Perhaps use method=dv/enum

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10528) Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API

Kensho Hirasawa created SOLR-10528: -- Summary: Use docvalue for range faceting in JSON facet API Key: SOLR-10528 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10528 Project: Solr Issue

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975807#comment-15975807 ] Mike Drob commented on SOLR-10525: -- It occurs to me that with this change if there is a steady stream of

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe resolved SOLR-10527. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Steve Rowe Fix Version/s: 6.5.1 > edismax with sow=false

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975772#comment-15975772 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975773#comment-15975773 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975769#comment-15975769 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Done. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > > Woohoo! Thanks Joel. Running all tests on branch_6_5 now. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > >> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: >> >> I'm OK

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Woohoo! Thanks Joel. Running all tests on branch_6_5 now. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > > I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back port. > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-9386) Upgrade Zookeeper to 3.4.10

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975738#comment-15975738 ] Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-9386: -- ZK 3.4.10 was released and includes a fix for ZOOKEEPER-2383:

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back port. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Joel, > > I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for some > reason, I’d like to

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-10527: -- Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.6 > edismax with sow=false fails to create

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Joel, I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for some reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527. -- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > > I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL issue. Which

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975714#comment-15975714 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975713#comment-15975713 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10527: Commit

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Steve Rowe updated SOLR-10527: -- Attachment: SOLR-10527.patch Patch with fix and tests. Committing shortly. > edismax with sow=false

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL issue. Which in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm pushing out my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update their branch before running the smoke tester. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19,

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10527) edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted

Steve Rowe created SOLR-10527: - Summary: edismax with sow=false fails to create dismax-per-term queries when any field is boosted Key: SOLR-10527 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10527

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 19434 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19434/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SolrCloudExampleTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 10 object(s) that were not

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5127) Allow multiple wildcards in hl.fl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975613#comment-15975613 ] Sven-S. Porst commented on SOLR-5127: - Cool, thanks for taking care of this [~cpoerschke]! > Allow

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975585#comment-15975585 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10525: Of course its complicated though. With the changes in SOLR-9555,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975573#comment-15975573 ] Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-10525 at 4/19/17 9:39 PM: - bq. looks like

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975573#comment-15975573 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10525: bq. looks like the same issue of multiple requests stacking.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975566#comment-15975566 ] Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-10525 at 4/19/17 9:33 PM: - Don't know if I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975566#comment-15975566 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10525: Don't know if I answered Shalin's comment, but I've answered

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master - Build # 1284 - Still Unstable

Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/1284/ 1 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestStressCloudBlindAtomicUpdates.test_stored_idx Error Message: There are still nodes recoverying - waited for 330 seconds Stack Trace: java.lang.AssertionError: There are

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975525#comment-15975525 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-10394: --- Github user jitka18 commented on the issue:

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #189: Jira/solr 6203

Github user jitka18 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/189 Hi, Christine. I accepted your pull request and will update my branch from the master later today. Will also take a look at the tests in DQCCST. Thanks, Judith On

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I seemed to have moved passed this issue. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the changes will do >

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975512#comment-15975512 ] Mike Drob commented on SOLR-10525: -- bq. The fact that multiple can still stack is as designed though why?

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10526) facet.heatmap doesn't honor fq tag exclusion in distributed search

David Smiley created SOLR-10526: --- Summary: facet.heatmap doesn't honor fq tag exclusion in distributed search Key: SOLR-10526 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10526 Project: Solr

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the changes will do the trick after they've been pushed. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975493#comment-15975493 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10525: Good catch! We def want to fix that cancel. The fact that

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mike Drob updated SOLR-10525: - Attachment: SOLR-10525.patch Patch for 7.0 fixed, probably good for 6.x also (in which case whoever

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-5687) Split off SinkTokenStream from TeeSinkTokenFilter (was add PrefillTokenStream ...)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot closed LUCENE-5687. Resolution: Won't Fix Not enough interest > Split off SinkTokenStream from TeeSinkTokenFilter

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-7068) Retrieve ranks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot closed LUCENE-7068. Resolution: Won't Fix Not enough interest > Retrieve ranks > -- > >

[jira] [Closed] (LUCENE-7471) Simplify NearSpansOrdered

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot closed LUCENE-7471. Resolution: Duplicate Duplicate of LUCENE-7715, fixed and closed. > Simplify NearSpansOrdered >

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8762) DIH entity child=true should respond nested documents on debug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gopikannan venugopalsamy updated SOLR-8762: --- Attachment: (was: SOLR-8762.patch) > DIH entity child=true should respond

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications on the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit (and push). Another alternative: make modifications in another checkout, then invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree. e.g.: cd .. cp -r lucene-solr

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-8762) DIH entity child=true should respond nested documents on debug

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] gopikannan venugopalsamy updated SOLR-8762: --- Attachment: SOLR-8762.patch [~mkhludnev], Please check this patch, Added

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-7602) Fix compiler warnings for ant clean compile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Paul Elschot resolved LUCENE-7602. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Not enough interest > Fix compiler warnings for ant clean compile >

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error: RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log origin/branch_6_5.." output is: So, I'm going to have to push this out. Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way forward. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification I get the following error: RuntimeError: git clone is dirty: So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have to commit locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you as the way forward? Joel Bernstein

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10283) SolrFeature fails to reject searches with missing efi (if used by fq)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-10283. Resolution: Fixed > SolrFeature fails to reject searches with missing efi (if used

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer is Semantic and they are being actively distrusted by - at least - Google: http://www.securityweek.com/google-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates Regards, Alex. http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated SOLR-10394: --- Comment: was deleted (was: Github user cpoerschke commented on the issue:

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-10394. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.6 >

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure if cert verification was something that was integral to the process. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Not sure why this is suddenly an issue -

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-5127) Allow multiple wildcards in hl.fl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke resolved SOLR-5127. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: master (7.0) 6.6 Thanks

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975438#comment-15975438 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-10394: --- Github user cpoerschke commented on the issue:

[GitHub] lucene-solr issue #189: Jira/solr 6203

Github user cpoerschke commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/189 Hi Judith - thanks for adding me to the collaborator list. I've added one more commit to the https://github.com/jitka18/lucene-solr/pull/1 request and would suggest something along the

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

Hi Joel, Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI” has been enabled on archive.apache.org? Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT an alternative to urllib):

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10525) Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another

Mike Drob created SOLR-10525: Summary: Stacked recovery requests can interfere with one another Key: SOLR-10525 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10525 Project: Solr Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-10456) timeout-related setters should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10456?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Gerlowski updated SOLR-10456: --- Attachment: SOLR-10456.patch Updates patch to remove conflicts with most recent master. >

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (32bit/jdk1.8.0_121) - Build # 19433 - Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/19433/ Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_121 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC 2 tests failed. FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.testNoConfigSetExist Error Message: Error from server at https://127.0.0.1:45919/solr: Could

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975379#comment-15975379 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-6630: Anything is better than "implicit". Explicit, Manual, and Custom

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975377#comment-15975377 ] Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-6630: --- I like "manual", let's stick to the original plan :-) It says it

Re: Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL cert for https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote: > I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following: > > python3

Issue with 6.5.1 RC2

I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following: python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1. But this time I got a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX (64bit/jdk1.8.0) - Build # 3960 - Still Unstable!

Build: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-MacOSX/3960/ Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC 1 tests failed. FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.SolrCloudExampleTest Error Message: ObjectTracker found 5 object(s) that were not

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-5379) Query-time multi-word synonym expansion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl closed SOLR-5379. - Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version/s: (was: 6.0) (was: 4.9) Closing as

[jira] [Closed] (SOLR-4381) Query-time multi-word synonym expansion

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan Høydahl closed SOLR-4381. - Resolution: Won't Fix Fix Version/s: (was: 6.0) (was: 4.9) Closing as

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

Ok, I'll start the process. Joel Bernstein http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:26 PM, David Smiley wrote: > +1 works for me > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > >> Shall I cut an RC2 today? >> >> Joel

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6630) Deprecate the "implicit" router and rename to "manual"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975331#comment-15975331 ] Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-6630: Thanks for the good discussion with names that I never thought of

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10524) Explore in-memory partitioning for processing Overseer queue messages

Erick Erickson created SOLR-10524: - Summary: Explore in-memory partitioning for processing Overseer queue messages Key: SOLR-10524 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524 Project: Solr

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 6.5.1 RC1

+1 works for me On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:06 AM Joel Bernstein wrote: > Shall I cut an RC2 today? > > Joel Bernstein > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Michael McCandless < > luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > >> OK backported! >> >> Mike

Re: lucene-solr:master: SOLR-10439: 'large' was forgotten in /schema/fields?showDefaults=true

(I replied to your similar comment on the JIRA issue) On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:05 PM Chris Hostetter wrote: > > David: doesn't this same bug affect /schema/fieldType ? > > Can't large="true" be specified on fieldType as a default for all fields > that inherit from

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10439) SchemaField.getNamedPropertyValues doesn't include 'large'

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975216#comment-15975216 ] David Smiley commented on SOLR-10439: - Thanks for filing SOLR-10518. It's a very thorough approach.

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10523) Add Apache kerby jars in the Solr server classpath

Hrishikesh Gadre created SOLR-10523: --- Summary: Add Apache kerby jars in the Solr server classpath Key: SOLR-10523 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10523 Project: Solr Issue

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10522) Duplicate keys in "collations" object with JSON response format

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975087#comment-15975087 ] Nikita Pchelintsev commented on SOLR-10522: --- It seems that

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

I know exactly how this works. MarkLogic can be configured with separate execute and data nodes. But in MarkLogic, the execute nodes can do a lot of work. The query may be a mix of indexed searching and “table scan” searching, all expressed in an XQuery program. It does not make sense for

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7789) replace & forbid "new FileInputStream" and "new FileOutputStream" with Files.newInputStream & Files.newOutputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975069#comment-15975069 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-7789: -- NOTE: I have not audited our own code to see how much of an impact

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7789) replace & forbid "new FileInputStream" and "new FileOutputStream" with Files.newInputStream & Files.newOutputStream

Hoss Man created LUCENE-7789: Summary: replace & forbid "new FileInputStream" and "new FileOutputStream" with Files.newInputStream & Files.newOutputStream Key: LUCENE-7789 URL:

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

@Walter: Think of it this way. 1. Separate data-solr from merger-solr. So merger-solr has more cpu, while data-solr has more ram (very simplistic). This way, you can also scale them separately. (es has something like search-only-node) 2. Second step is to join client-app with merger-solr.

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

That is exactly what I thought you meant. Adds complexity with no benefit. Now the merger needs to keep caches for global IDF. But those caches don’t get the benefit of other requests to the same cluster. I’m not sure if query result caches cache the results of distributed queries, but if they

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10047) Mismatched Docvalue segments cause exception in Sorting/Facting; Uninvert per segment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15975006#comment-15975006 ] Keith Laban commented on SOLR-10047: Thanks Steve, I am able to reproduce this using this seed. The

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-10522) Duplicate keys in "collations" object with JSON response format

Nikita Pchelintsev created SOLR-10522: - Summary: Duplicate keys in "collations" object with JSON response format Key: SOLR-10522 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10522 Project:

Re: Embeding distributed-solr in client-app without storing data

@Walter Usually you have: client-app --> random-solr-node(mergerer) --> each other node that has a shard While what I want: client-app (mergerer is in same jvm) --> each other node that has a shard Makes sense ? On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SOLR-1485) Payload scoring support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15973885#comment-15973885 ] Erik Hatcher edited comment on SOLR-1485 at 4/19/17 3:29 PM: - While I'm at it,

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christine Poerschke updated LUCENE-7788: Attachment: LUCENE-7788.patch bq. ... Also, should we remove the if (trace) from

[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974899#comment-15974899 ] Christine Poerschke edited comment on LUCENE-7788 at 4/19/17 3:20 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-7788) fail precommit on unparameterised log.trace messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974887#comment-15974887 ] Christine Poerschke commented on LUCENE-7788: - bq. ... it only catches cases when the logger

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10394) search.grouping.Command rename: getSortWithinGroup --> getWithinGroupSort

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974836#comment-15974836 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10394: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10415) Within solr-core, debug/trace level logging should use parameterized log messages

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974835#comment-15974835 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10415: Commit

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-5127) Allow multiple wildcards in hl.fl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15974833#comment-15974833 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-5127: --- Commit

  1   2   >