Trejkaz created LUCENE-4073:
---
Summary: Lucene puts output of svnversion into a property even if
svnversion failed
Key: LUCENE-4073
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4073
Project: Lucene - Ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933222#action_12933222
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
Finally got around to checking this out today, and it l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933659#action_12933659
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
Another way of solving this particular issue would be i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12934214#action_12934214
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
Field collapsing has different semantics which don't ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935748#action_12935748
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
I don't really want to argue good or bad design, becaus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935750#action_12935750
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2506:
-
Putting my vote on this one.
About 80% of our filters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935765#action_12935765
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
That is exactly the workaround we performed for our own
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935891#action_12935891
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2506:
-
bq. What if Filter.getDocIDSet also received the top re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935894#action_12935894
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
It used to do the work in getDocIdSet() - it wasn't us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935925#action_12935925
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2506:
-
bq. What do you do when segments merge and these very-v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12935928#action_12935928
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2506:
-
That sounds like it would cost a fair bit of memory if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986848#action_12986848
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-879:
The workaround of using an ID turns out to be very slow.
I wish Lucene query explanations were easier to localise
Key: LUCENE-3013
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3013
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Wish
Compo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033860#comment-13033860
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-1149:
-
Is there an issue which this one is a true "duplicate"
MoreLikeThis reuses a reader after it has already closed it
---
Key: LUCENE-3326
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3326
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
ParametricRangeQueryNodeProcessor support for time zones
Key: LUCENE-3352
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3352
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
ParametricRangeQueryNodeProcessor uses incorrect logic at the lower bound
-
Key: LUCENE-3353
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3353
Project: Lucene - Java
Incorrect behaviour of MultiFieldQueryNodeProcessor when default operator is
'AND'
--
Key: LUCENE-3355
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3355
Project: Luc
StandardTokenizer disposes of Hiragana combining mark dakuten instead of
attaching it to the character it belongs to
Key: LUCENE-3358
URL: https:/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13079727#comment-13079727
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3358:
-
Thanks for such a fast fix! :D (I will still wait for
GroupQueryNodeProcessor doesn't recursively process children of custom query
nodes
--
Key: LUCENE-3367
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3367
Project: Luc
Support for a "SpanNotNearQuery"
Key: LUCENE-3370
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3370
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: core/search
Reporter:
Support for a "SpanAndQuery" / "SpanAllNearQuery"
-
Key: LUCENE-3371
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3371
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13082284#comment-13082284
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3371:
-
Yeah, it would provide a span much like a normal WITHI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13082708#comment-13082708
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3370:
-
That's not a bad idea.
Some care should be taken thou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13082710#comment-13082710
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3371:
-
That sounds about right.
I had another thought connec
Trejkaz created LUCENE-5186:
---
Summary: Add CachingWrapperFilter.getFilter()
Key: LUCENE-5186
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5186
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-5186:
Attachment: LUCENE-5186.patch
Since it's pretty trivial. :)
> Add CachingWrapperFilter.ge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13591331#comment-13591331
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-1206:
-
I think this would still be useful. The workaround of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz closed LUCENE-1245.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
I guess this resolution is correct. We have stopped using the basic query
parser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12874370#action_12874370
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
What you describe is precisely the problem. It will de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12874373#action_12874373
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
I attempted to make a test but it fails with matching 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12874841#action_12874841
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
That change broke nearly all our own filters. We have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12881500#action_12881500
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2348:
-
That does solve the specific issue I resolved... I wond
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12881500#action_12881500
]
Trejkaz edited comment on LUCENE-2348 at 6/22/10 9:01 PM:
--
That d
IndexWriter.isLocked() fails on a read-only directory
-
Key: LUCENE-2607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2607
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
Trejkaz created LUCENE-5676:
---
Summary: QueryNodeImpl is too mutable
Key: LUCENE-5676
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5676
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13956008#comment-13956008
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-2327:
-
I have an almost identical stack trace from v3.6, but
Trejkaz created LUCENE-5905:
---
Summary: Different behaviour of JapaneseAnalyzer at indexing time
vs. at search time
Key: LUCENE-5905
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5905
Project: Lucene - C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-5905:
Affects Version/s: 5.2.1
Description:
A document with the word 秋葉原 in the body, when analysed by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-5905:
Summary: Different behaviour of JapaneseAnalyzer at indexing time vs. at
search time results in no matches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13877912#comment-13877912
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3565:
-
Seems to have been fixed in 3.6.2.
> StandardQueryPa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878608#comment-13878608
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3565:
-
The expectation in the test case aside, what Lucene wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13878615#comment-13878615
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3565:
-
And actually, if you read my original comment from 201
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13879412#comment-13879412
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3355:
-
Looks like this has been fixed at some point between 3
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6826:
---
Summary: java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.lucene.index.TermsEnum$2 cannot be cast to
org.apache.lucene.index.MultiTermsEnum when adding indexes
Key: LUCENE-6826
URL: https://issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14944724#comment-14944724
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6826:
-
One of the fields, our test indexes all have the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-6826:
Attachment: Lucene6826.java
This test creates an index with one document which contains a value which does
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6851:
---
Summary: Allow using other implementations of Format with
NumericConfig
Key: LUCENE-6851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6851
Project: Lucene - Core
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6864:
---
Summary: java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find bundle for
base name org.apache.lucene.queryParser.messages.QueryParserMessages
Key: LUCENE-6864
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6865:
---
Summary: BooleanQuery2ModifierNodeProcessor breaks the query node
hierarchy
Key: LUCENE-6865
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14979528#comment-14979528
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6865:
-
Standalone reproduction:
{code}
import java.util.Arra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14979537#comment-14979537
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6865:
-
Suspicious code #1. A call to processIteration which i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14979605#comment-14979605
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6865:
-
Another reproduction which doesn't use the processor,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14979684#comment-14979684
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6865:
-
These tests fail too. Note these don't even call set()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14981682#comment-14981682
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6865:
-
The underlying issue here seems like it might be LUCEN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14984675#comment-14984675
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6865:
-
Tried updating to 5.3, looks like backwards compatibil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14984702#comment-14984702
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6865:
-
Temporary workaround for now I guess. Override the pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14984702#comment-14984702
]
Trejkaz edited comment on LUCENE-6865 at 11/2/15 3:44 AM:
--
Tempo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14603872#comment-14603872
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6542:
-
It works something like this:
{code:java}
import org.
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6655:
---
Summary: StandardTokenizerFactory constructor fails if the passed
in map is immutable
Key: LUCENE-6655
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6655
Project: Lucene -
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6656:
---
Summary: StandardTokenizer.close() can leave the object in an
uncloseable state
Key: LUCENE-6656
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6656
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-6655:
Summary: All analysis factory constructors fail if the passed in map is
immutable (was: StandardTokenizerF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14614606#comment-14614606
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-5956:
-
> how valuable is it to support older than N-1 indexes
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6658:
---
Summary: IndexUpgrader doesn't upgrade an index if it has zero
segments
Key: LUCENE-6658
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6658
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14616111#comment-14616111
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6658:
-
This works when applied to my v4 and v5 here as well.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14616117#comment-14616117
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6658:
-
What does work: making a forceCommit() method which do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14621838#comment-14621838
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-5956:
-
The class loader approach is definitely turning out to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15278502#comment-15278502
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7135:
-
I see this when running our unit tests also. Evidently
Trejkaz created LUCENE-7260:
---
Summary: StandardQueryParser is over 100 times slower in v5
compared to v3
Key: LUCENE-7260
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7260
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15261691#comment-15261691
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7260:
-
Well, this slowdown is also noticeable in our full app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15262522#comment-15262522
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7260:
-
Is there a faster way to do it? Keeping in mind that i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz closed LUCENE-6865.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Fix Version/s: 5.3
Verified as another duplicate of LUCENE-5805. Fixed by the sa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15262648#comment-15262648
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7260:
-
Meanwhile I threw some hashCode() calls in on the quer
Trejkaz created LUCENE-7266:
---
Summary: QueryNode#cloneTree produces a new tree where parents are
not correctly set
Key: LUCENE-7266
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7266
Project: Lucene - C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-7266:
Affects Version/s: 5.4.1
> QueryNode#cloneTree produces a new tree where parents are not correctly set
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15469539#comment-15469539
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7434:
-
Dupe of LUCENE-3369?
> Add minNumberShouldMatch para
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15469543#comment-15469543
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3370:
-
It does seem to give me what I wanted, so I think it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15469582#comment-15469582
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-3371:
-
To summarise some investigation I did towards using Sp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15469582#comment-15469582
]
Trejkaz edited comment on LUCENE-3371 at 9/7/16 5:17 AM:
-
To summ
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6542:
---
Summary: FSDirectory throws AccessControlException unless you
grant write access to the index
Key: LUCENE-6542
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6542
Project: L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-6542:
Attachment: patch.txt
Patch guards the Files.createDirectories call with a Files.exists check.
Files.exist
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6584:
---
Summary: Docs on StandardTokenizer don't mention the behaviour
change in Version.LUCENE_4_7_0
Key: LUCENE-6584
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6584
Project: L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14592934#comment-14592934
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6584:
-
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_10_4/analyzers-common/
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6498:
---
Summary: RegexpQueryNode inconsistent treatment of begin and end
parameters
Key: LUCENE-6498
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6498
Project: Lucene - Core
Trejkaz created LUCENE-6503:
---
Summary: QueryWrapperFilter discards the IndexReaderContext when
delegating to the wrapped query
Key: LUCENE-6503
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6503
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15868916#comment-15868916
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7260:
-
Lucene 5.5 is an additional 50% slower.
{noformat}
dt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-7260:
Affects Version/s: 5.5.2
6.3
> StandardQueryParser is over 100 times slower in v5 co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15868920#comment-15868920
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7260:
-
Lucene 6.3:
{noformat}
dt: 22307
dt: 21190
dt: 21004
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16030636#comment-16030636
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-6917:
-
Did this ever hit the dev list? Google can't seem to f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15967058#comment-15967058
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7467:
-
Saw the same thing on Lucene 5.5.2.
{code}
DefaultInd
Trejkaz created LUCENE-7616:
---
Summary: QueryNode#toQueryString says it produces a string in the
syntax understood by "the query parser", but cannot possibly know how
Key: LUCENE-7616
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15793923#comment-15793923
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-7616:
-
As an additional nasty point, sometimes this method is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15793976#comment-15793976
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-998:
Won't fix? I was about to file this one.
I don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-5905:
Affects Version/s: 6.6
> Different behaviour of JapaneseAnalyzer at indexing time vs. at search time
> res
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16233550#comment-16233550
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-5905:
-
Adding one more case we found which seems to behave th
96 matches
Mail list logo
