I added the missing ASL header.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@sd-datasolutions.de wrote:
Build:
http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux-Java7-64/438/
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 15182 lines...]
BUILD FAILED
I am about to write a Filter that only operates on a set of documents that
have already passed other filter(s). It's rather expensive, since it has
to use DocValues to examine a value and then determine if its a match. So
it scales O(n) where n is the number of documents it must see. The 2nd
Rob,
It appears you are in-effect the Release Manager for v4.0 so I'm
asking you this question. Clearly v4 is going to be out soon and
consequently we're not pushing new features to the v4 branch.
Regarding the new spatial codebase, there isn't a backwards
compatibility concern to changes until
Nice! Welcome back Wolfgang!
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Uwe Schindler uschind...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
I'm pleased to announce that after a long abstinence, Wolfgang Hoschek
rejoined the Lucene/Solr committer team. He is working now at Cloudera and
plans to help with the integration
Dawid,
Could you please take a look at the reproducibility of this test failure in
lucene/spatial? I tried to reproduce it but couldn't, and I thought
perhaps you might have some insight because I'm using some
RandomizedTesting features that aren't as often used, like @Repeat. For
example, one
I'll look into this one and get it fixed ASAP.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/9725/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.7.0_51 -server -XX:+UseSerialGC
2 tests failed.
FAILED:
I'm definitely looking at it and I've found the problem. I'm working on a
fix right now.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I someone looking at this test failure? Should we @BadApple it, or
revert recent spatial changes, or something?
I'm looking in to this.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 5:45 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/9882/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_60-ea-b10 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
+1
SUCCESS! [2:13:44.301402]
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote for the first Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.1.
Download it here:
http://people.apache.org/~sarowe/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.7.1-RC1-rev1581444/
Smoke tester cmdline:
+1
SUCCESS! [1:51:37.952160]
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote for the second Release Candidate for Lucene/Solr 4.7.1.
Download it here:
https://people.apache.org/~sarowe/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.7.1-RC2-rev1582953/
Smoke tester cmdline
Welcome Alan!
~ David
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that Alan Woodward has accepted the PMC's
invitation to join.
Welcome Alan!
- Steve
-
To unsubscribe,
Benson, I like your idea.
I think your idea can be achieved as a codec, one that wraps another codec
that establishes the on-disk format. By default the wrapped codec can be
Lucene's default codec. I think, if implemented, this would be a change to
DPF instead of an additional DPF-variant
a DirectAtomicReader which does that? I believe
it can share some code w/ DPF, as long as we don't make these APIs public,
or make them @super.experimental and @super.expert.
Just throwing some ideas...
Shai
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:35 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote
Welcome Tim!
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that Tim Potter has accepted the PMC's invitation
to become a committer.
Tim, it's tradition that you introduce yourself with a brief bio.
Once your account has been created - could
LOL indeed ;-)
But in all seriousness, that should have no bearing on this conversation.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's hope nobody is trying to finish any books right now. :-)
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
Current
FYI I published this blog post today:
http://www.opensourceconnections.com/2014/04/11/indexing-polygons-in-lucene-with-accuracy/
There's a strong Spatial4j connection because the SerializedDVStrategy
referenced uses the new BinaryCodec from Spatial4j 0.4.
~ David
Alex,
Yes it would be useful (of course)! In addition, the admin UI should have
a link to it, in addition to the generic documentation link. Create an
issue and I’ll commit it.
~ David
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
The binary Solr
This build started before I fixed the issue; it’s already fixed.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/10106/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_55 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
Zhifeng,
Please ask Solr questions on the solr-user list.
Thanks.
~ David
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Zhifeng Wang zhifeng.wang...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
We are facing a high incoming rate of usually small documents (logs). The
incoming rate is initially assumed at 2K/sec but could reach
Is this still up to date?:
https://blog.trifork.com/2011/04/01/gimme-all-resources-you-have-i-can-use-them/
I thought at some point subsequently, some significant work was done, and
perhaps it was blogged. But I can’t find it.
~ David
I’m working on an encoding of numbers / data into indexed terms. In the
past I limited the encoding to ASCII but now I’m doing it at a more
raw/byte level. Do I have to be aware of UTF8 / sorting issues when I do
this? I noticed the following code in NumericUtils.java, line 186:
while
','david.w.smi...@gmail.com');[mailto:
david.w.smi...@gmail.comjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','david.w.smi...@gmail.com');]
*Sent:* Sunday, May 11, 2014 1:17 AM
*To:*
dev@lucene.apache.orgjavascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','dev@lucene.apache.org');
*Cc:* Uwe Schindler; Michael McCandless
*Subject:* Encoding data
I’ll dig.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/10394/
Java:
Thanks for fixing, Rob.
~ David
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/10472/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_20-ea-b15 -server -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
In my view, solrconfig.xml shouldn’t refer to any field by name out of the
box, except for the /browse handler, and perhaps pre-filling the query form
in the admin GUI. That’s it.
A couple years ago at about the time I became a committer, I finally did
something about a feature I am very
I suggest investigating this using a known example that does this, such as
LatLonType and geodist(). LatLonType registers the field in a custom way
too.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 7:54
One of the ideas over DIH discussed earlier is making it standalone.
Yeah; my beef with the DIH is that it’s tied to Solr. But I’d rather see
something other than the DIH outside Solr; it’s not worthy IMO. Why have
something Solr specific even? A great pipeline shouldn’t tie itself to any
I’m on it.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/10516/
Java:
FYI see https://wiki.apache.org/solr/IntegratingSolr for a list. This is a
great use of the wiki.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On trunk I cleaned and re-created my IntelliJ based build (ant clean-idea,
idea). IntelliJ didn’t get the memo about Java 8 so I changed that
(locally). Then I found that the Solr velocity contrib couldn’t resolve a
ResourceLoader class in analysis-common. So I simply checked the “export”
GitHub offers SVN access:
svn checkout https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:19 AM, Yosuke Yamatani
s151...@center.wakayama-u.ac.jp wrote:
Dear sir/madam
misalignments with the Ant build, and because unwanted transitive deps
could improperly influence the IntelliJ build. But if you feel strongly
about it, go ahead: -0.
Thanks for working on it.
Steve
On Nov 24, 2014, at 10:37 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
On trunk I cleaned and re
Reposting my comment on JIRA:
Ouch; so sorry I failed the build! In my checkout I have several pending
issues related to highlighting, and apparently the Solr one, SOLR-6680
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6680, is dependent. I should
have monitored the dev list closely; I recall
I meant to reply earlier...
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
They are super-stale
Yup but it’s a wiki so feel free to freshen it up. I’ll be doing that in a
bit. It may also be helpful if these particular pages got more
prominence/visibility
in the vein of a “do-it-tocracy”, getting the Wiki updated is a
perfectly good first step, and then if there is a better approach,
hopefully that occurs.… ;-)
On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 1 December 2014 at 10:02, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
I’ll dig.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2267/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.spatial.prefix.DateNRStrategyTest.testContains
{#9
+1, at least for the spatial part I looked at
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
wrote:
+1
:
Your arguments really resonate with me, Ryan…
+1 to Java 8
(FWIW I’m using coding in Java 8 these days already)
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Ryan Ernst r...@iernst.net wrote:
Ryan,
I’m unclear on what makes a “procedural vote” as such. This seems to me to
be about code modifications — in a big way as it’s a large change to the
codebase.
~ David
LOL I had the very same reaction Alexandre. Most of us don’t have all this
big data software sitting around, even if it is free. Complexity.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:44 AM,
I’m on it.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Windows/4119/
Java:
That doesn’t make sense to me either, Toke. Have you tried changing it and
running tests to see that they pass?
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Toke Eskildsen
This is not a spatial bug; it’s another case of:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5713
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
The smoke tester failed for me:
*lucene-solr_4x_svn*$ python3.3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_9_0_r1604085/
1604085 4.9.0 /Volumes/RamDisk/tmp
JAVA7_HOME is
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_51.jdk/Contents/Home
, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
The smoke tester failed for me:
lucene-solr_4x_svn$ python3.3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
http://people.apache.org/~rmuir/staging_area/lucene_solr_4_9_0_r1604085/
1604085 4.9.0 /Volumes/RamDisk/tmp
JAVA7_HOME
Another case of:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5713
(cause unknown)
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build:
, 2014 at 6:13 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
Another case of:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5713
(cause unknown)
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
FieldCache is historically lenient, it allows all kinds of nonsense,
such as uninverting a multi-valued field as single-valued (e.g. leaves
gaps in ordinals and other bullshit that will cause this assertion to
fail).
I can
I was experimenting with having a user-provided/customized FieldType
for indexing code of (mostly) a set of numeric fields that are of a
common type. The user/developer might want the type to both be
indexed have docValues, or perhaps just one. Or maybe stored
hypothetically for the purposes of
officially?
Any way, I’ll go with this for now. FYI this very class is going to
show up in spatial BBoxStrategy in a new patch soon.
~ David
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:48 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
I was experimenting with having a user-provided/customized FieldType
I’m on it; this’ll get fixed momentarily. Some co-related JIRA issues; one
got committed without the other.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months ago, I filed INFRA JIRA issue to add the Lucene project to
review board (https://reviews.apache.org) and it was just resolved (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7630).
Awesome.
I’m not the
That sounds like a wonderful project, Alexandre — I’ve always wanted such a
capability!
I suggest approaching this very pragmatically based on minimizing the time
to get something useful, which means leveraging as much as is available
already — that means solr’s existing analysis UI screen. I
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Timothy Potter thelabd...@gmail.com
wrote:
sheisty class
LOL that error is funny.
Tim,
Take a look at the smoke tester like 268 or so. It already makes
exceptions for certain Solr contrib modules, and apparently you need to
augument it further.
~ David
Steve,
File a bug.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Steve Molloy smol...@opentext.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into an issue with distributed spellcheck and was wondering if
Welcome Tomas!
Will you make it to Lucene/Solr Revolution in November?
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe
tomasflo...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone, I’m
...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
I’ll dig.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/2267/
1 tests failed.
FAILED
On 1 December 2014 at 20:04, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the “last updated …” (rounded to the month) idea. It may be
difficult to maintain a “last checked” distinction, and create
somewhat more
of a burden on maintaining the list. I think it’s useful
Thanks for sharing; I’ll add that to my reading list.
FWIW I don’t trust the G1 enough for production use. Some random
Lucene/Solr build failures are blamed on it, even.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Dec
Hi Alex,
There isn’t a way to say “just schema-related ones”. But, if you suspect
the tests you want to run will have a string in the class name then you can
run tests for classes matching a supplied regexp. For example:
ant test -Dtestcase=*High*
And do that from within a specific module
?
Thanks
Michael
Am 07.12.14 um 04:29 schrieb david.w.smi...@gmail.com:
Hi Alex,
There isn’t a way to say “just schema-related ones”. But, if you
suspect
the tests you want to run will have a string in the class name then you
can
run tests for classes matching a supplied regexp
Michael,
I recall you’re working on building a test tool that sees changes and runs
applicable tests? If that’s the case, why would it matter if CHANGES.txt
gets updated? The vast majority of the time there is a reference to a JIRA
issue from the commit message, and most JIRA issues that have
Abhishek,
Please send such questions to the solr-user list, not the Lucene dev list.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Abhishek Sharma abhishe...@unbxd.com
wrote:
Hi,
Can any one
IMO there’s no such thing as having too many FSTs :-P
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
If it's not too late, I'd
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Timothy Potter thelabd...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wow - that's a fast box Mike!
My thoughts exactly.
+1
SUCCESS! [0:58:16.394370]
Down to practicalities, we need Lucene 4.8 as our DocValues are Disk
based and that support was removed in 4.9.
I assume you’re referring to the “Disk” DV format/Codec? The standard
format has the data on disk too, it’s just that there’s some “small”
(relative to the disk data) lookup
Ouch; thanks!
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I committed a fix.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
https://github.com/arafalov/Solr-Javadoc/tree/master/SearchServer
Pretty cool, Alex!
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
I’m working on making highlighting both accurate and fast. By “accurate”,
I mean the highlights need to accurately reflect a match given the query
and various possible query types (to include SpanQueries and
MultiTermQueries and obviously phrase queries and the usual suspects). The
fastest
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
+1 for a completely accurate (each snippet shown matches the query)
and fast highlighter, but it's a real challenge because you need a
clean way to recursively iterate all positions for any (even
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:38 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
The fastest
highlighter we’ve got in Lucene is the PostingsHighlighter but it throws
out
any positional nature in the query
://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
*From:* david.w.smi...@gmail.com [mailto:david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, October 10, 2014 4:46 PM
*To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Highlighters, accurate highlighting, and the
PostingsHighlighter
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014
I’ll look into it.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/11036/
Java:
Ok.
I wish the router was an explicit option, separate from declaring
numShards. And furthermore, that it would never be “implicit” unless you
expressly told it to be. People sometimes get this router because they
forget numShards, thinking “1 is fine anyway”. — for now.
~ David Smiley
Hi Erick,
The field type for LatLonType mandates a subFieldSuffix or subFieldType
attribute, and so I think there’s clearly a problem if you don’t provide a
field type that’s going to match it. The default schema even has a comment
on the dynamicField definition for *_coordinate that it’s
Tomás, I put you into the “Committers” role for Lucene Solr in JIRA just
now.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com
wrote:
May I be missing
Welcome!
On Friday, September 19, 2014, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that Gregory Chanan has accepted the PMC's
invitation to become a committer.
Gregory, it's tradition that you introduce yourself with a brief bio.
Mark Miller, the Lucene PMC chair, has
I use the benchmark module for spatial and I intend to for highlighting
performance next month.
On Wednesday, September 24, 2014, Mikhail Khludnev
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com wrote:
Hi John,
It's obvious
Alex,
You should follow Yonik’s blog (Heliosearch), he has a post on this
subject, more or less:
http://heliosearch.org/lucene-solr-history/
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Alexandre
+1 Yeah, this would be huge.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Jan Høydahl jan@cominvent.com wrote:
Also a crucial part here is to add a Collection tab in Admin GUI, and a
more
Several times now, I’ve had to come up with work-arounds for a TokenStream
not knowing it’s processing the first value or a subsequent-value of a
multi-valued field. Two of these times, the use-case was ensuring the
first position of each value started at a multiple of 1000 (or some other
wrote:
Maybe the position increment gap would be useful? If set to a value
larger than likely max position for any individual value, it could be used
to infer (non-)first-value-ness.
On Nov 5, 2014, at 1:03 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
Several times now, I’ve had to come up
the
other ideas better though.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you suggesting that DefaultIndexingChain.PerField.invert(boolean
firstValue) would, prior to calling reset(), call
setPositionIncrement(Integer.MAX_VALUE), but only when
Weird; I can’t reproduce this given the given Ant invocation given. I used
JDK 1.8.0_20.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Schemitz p...@solute.de wrote:
This Query/Weight/Scorer construct is obviously very costly, so I don't
want it to leapfrog with the other - much faster - filters in the query
(especially when using a high threshold).
It’s leap-frogging with filters?
+1 for “manual”.
Furthermore, I think specifying the router should become mandatory or
default to the has based router. For back-compat, we can keep current
behavior but output a warning about what choice was made.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for “manual”.
Furthermore, I think specifying the router should become mandatory or
default to the has based router.
That is the current default (compositeId)
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org - native code faceting, facet
Some of the bugs it has helped me find that I am most appreciative of are
in testing spatial code. One comes to mind when I developed the IsWithin
predicate, and others in computing the bounding lat-lon box of a geodetic
circle, and… and on and on… but the details are unimportant really and to
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5400
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:17 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
On one of my other open-source projects (SolrTextTagger) I have a test
that deliberately tests the effect of a very long token with the
StandardTokenizer, and that project
On one of my other open-source projects (SolrTextTagger) I have a test that
deliberately tests the effect of a very long token with the
StandardTokenizer, and that project is in turn tested against a wide matrix
of Lucene/Solr versions. Before Lucene 4.9, if you had a token that
exceeded
-0 Hoss’s points are my view as well. 8983 is already pretty well known
amongst Solr users.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org
wrote:
: Until
Cool!
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 5, 2015, at 9:51 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Just saw a link to
Anshum, are you going to create a 5.1 version in JIRA so we can
appropriately assign issues?
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net
wrote:
Thanks for
+1 to SOLR-6976 especially.
I’m sad about SpanQueries not getting nuked yet :-(
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
to be part of the search query.
If you are in favor, I'll create a ticket and attach the library.
Karl
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:01 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay. Since this is not _already_ implementing a Spatial4j shape, I can
only presume
Nice Karl! I’d love to learn more about this. Does the shapes here
implement a Spatial4j Shape and thus would work with SpatialPrefixTree
friends for index search? If not, what is the search side of the
equation here?
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:27 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice Karl! I’d love to learn more about this. Does the shapes here
implement a Spatial4j Shape and thus would work with SpatialPrefixTree
friends for index search? If not, what is the search side
stay java 7.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 6:13 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
I found two problems, and I’m not sure what to make of them.
First, perhaps the simplest. I ran it with Java 8 with this at the
command-line (copied from Uwe’s email, inserting my
It reproduces; I’m on it.
~ David Smiley
Freelance Apache Lucene/Solr Search Consultant/Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
jenk...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/11780/
I found two problems, and I’m not sure what to make of them.
First, perhaps the simplest. I ran it with Java 8 with this at the
command-line (copied from Uwe’s email, inserting my environment variable):
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py --test-java8 $JAVA8_HOME
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
