is there any way to get ByteRef from a field originally stored as String?
I am playing with Sorter to implement StoredDocSorter, analogous to
NumericDocValuesSorter. But realised I do not need ByteRef - String
conversion just to compare fields (byte order would be as good for sorting)
…
On Mar 17, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
You can do new BytesRef(d1.get(fieldName)).
Shai
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:43 PM, eksdev eks...@googlemail.com wrote:
is there any way to get ByteRef from a field originally stored as String?
I am playing with Sorter
, 2013 at 3:02 PM, eksdev eks...@googlemail.com wrote:
Shai, was that irony or I am missing something big time?
I would like to spare BytesRef - String conversion, not to introduce another
one back to BytesRef
Simply, for sorting, you do not need to do this byte[]-String conversion,
byte
for it! It also improved compression by 12% (very small, 4k
chunk size)
On Mar 17, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:58 PM, eksdev eks...@googlemail.com wrote:
sure, there is a way to make anything - byte[] ;)
it looks like this byte[]-type
humpf, do we actually need stored fields?
What is wrong with having byte[] DV that stores all document fields, e.g.
avro or something simpler to serialise all document fields into one byte[]?
I am definitely missing something about DV/Stored fields diff, not sure what?
On Mar 6, 2013,
Just to share some experience if someone hits the same problem.
We had huge problems on Win7 64bit, JVM 64bit 1.7.0_07, (a few days old trunk
version, 5.0, default codec) solr under tomcat thread queue limited to 20 .
NRTCaching and MMAP have the same problems (no updates , just search).
thanks Mark!
On Nov 27, 2012, at 8:43 PM, Mark Miller (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13504875#comment-13504875
]
Mark Miller commented on
On Nov 8, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everybody for response, and much more of the same for the great project
Why are you retrieving thousands of stored fields?
I do not think it is all that rare that people actually do something with
information but
Just a theoretical question, would it make sense to add some sort of
StoredDocument[] bulkGet(int[] docId) to fetch multiple stored documents in one
go?
The reasoning behind is that now with compressed blocks random-access gets more
expensive, and in some cases a user needs to fetch more
I *think* I did. Will try to build again...
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Simon Willnauer simon.willna...@gmail.com wrote:
did you clean your checkout?
simon
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:10 PM, eksdev eks...@googlemail.com wrote:
debugQuery=true on on simple TermQuery (/trunk version from
clean did it,
never use eclipse if you want to know exactly what you did, command line works
always
sorry for the noise
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:15 PM, eksdev eks...@googlemail.com wrote:
I *think* I did. Will try to build again...
On Nov 2, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Simon Willnauer simon.willna
11 matches
Mail list logo
