with Lucene.Net as is.
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:42:03 -0800
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Regarding the short term goals that Scott mentioned, I agree. I think
over
Welcome to SF!
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:05:16 -0800
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Yes, a lot of it is done. Porting highlighter is partially done, not
committed, because
!
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:05:16 -0800
From: currens.ch...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Yes, a lot of it is done. Porting highlighter is partially done, not
committed, because it relies on the memory contrive package in java,
which
5:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been
doing this for a lot longer than I have, but I didn't
understand you pain until I had to go through it personally. :P
Have you
From: Scott Lombard
Sent: 11/22/2011 8:56 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Mike,
You're right about putting together a higher level discussion. Here are
the
road map items I see. I am interested in other have to say.
None of the items I have listed
On 2011-11-22, Prescott Nasser wrote:
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
With the 4.0 release we
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
I just sent that vote email out - do you want me to update?
On 2011-11-23, Prescott Nasser wrote:
My goal is to release 2.9.4 this month - it looks like we have no -1s
from our dev list so in the next day or so I will put that to the
general incubator list.
Please remember to mention you need two more IPMC member votes.
I just sent that vote email
In the same vain: sort out the build process in a way that doesn't
require the tools to be checked into svn.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENENET/Road+Map
Posting these under floating goals on wiki. I already have some ideas on
how this can be done, so I've linked the above
-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
While much of the content in this thread is valid and is
important, especially concerns, pain points, and
implementation details... we've gotten way off topic.
road map != implementation details. We should keep to a much
a higher level
: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:28 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
While much of the content in this thread is valid and is
important, especially concerns, pain points
From: Scott Lombard
Sent: 11/22/2011 8:56 AM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Mike,
You're right about putting together a higher level discussion. Here are the
road map items I see. I am interested in other have to say.
None
11:45 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
I used 2.9.4 trunk as the base for the 3.0.3 branch, but I looked to the
code in 2.9.4g as a reference for many things, particularly the Support
classes. We hit many of the same issues I'm sure, I moved some
.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:45 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
I used 2.9.4 trunk as the base for the 3.0.3 branch, but I looked to the
code
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
To clarify, it wasn't as much *difficult* as it was more *painful*. Above,
I was inferring that it was more difficult that the rest of the code, which
by comparison was easier. It wasn't painless to try and map where code
changes were from the java classes
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been
doing this for a lot longer than I have, but I didn't
understand you pain until I had to go through it personally. :P
Have you looked at Contrib in a while? There's a lot
...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 5:23 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
No worries. I wasn't taking them personally. You've been
doing this for a lot longer than I have, but I didn't
understand you pain until I had to go
Regarding the 3.0.3 branch I started last week, I've put in a lot of late
nights and gotten far more done in a week and a half than I expected. The
list of changes is very large, and fortunately, I've documented it in some
files that are in the branches root of certain projects. I'll list what
, etc).
- Nick
From: Christopher Currens currens.ch...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 2:56 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Regarding the 3.0.3 branch I started last week, I've put in a lot of late
From: Christopher Currens currens.ch...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 2:56 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Regarding the 3.0.3 branch I started last week, I've put in a lot of late
nights and gotten far more done in a week
From: Christopher Currens currens.ch...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 3:18 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org, casper...@caspershouse.com
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Some of the Lucene classes have Dispose methods, well, ones that call Close
Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 10:19 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org; casper...@caspershouse.com
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Some of the Lucene classes have Dispose methods, well, ones that call Close
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:45 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
I used 2.9.4 trunk as the base for the 3.0.3 branch, but I looked to the
code in 2.9.4g
: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
So, if we're getting back to the line by line port discussion... I
think either side of this discussion is too extreme. For the case in
point Chris just mentioned (which I'm not really sure what part was so
difficult, as I ported that library in about 30 minutes from
changes/divergences. I made/could have made them too.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:currens.ch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:45 PM
To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Roadmap
Digy,
I used 2.9.4
25 matches
Mail list logo
