This vote has passed. I opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8738.
Thanks all.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:27 AM Varun Thacker wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:47 AM David Smiley wrote:
>>
>> +1 -- great point about Lucene/Solr's next major release being a ways off;
>>
+1
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:47 AM David Smiley
wrote:
> +1 -- great point about Lucene/Solr's next major release being a ways off;
> this makes the decision pretty easy.
>
> ~ David Smiley
> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 19,
+1 -- great point about Lucene/Solr's next major release being a ways off;
this makes the decision pretty easy.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:23 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0
are of removing the
>> Future* classes.
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>> -
>> Uwe Schindler
>> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
>> http://www.thetaphi.de
>> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Adrien
e
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adrien Grand
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 7:23 PM
> > To: Lucene Dev
> > Subject: [VOTE] Master/9.0 to require Java 11
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:23 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
> Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between
> 7.0 and 8.0, so if we assume a
+1 - Java 8 EOLed last year - moving on in 2020 is reasonable and it's our
responsibility to move with the platform we are running on.
simon
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 9:27 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>
> 19. mar.
+1
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> 19. mar. 2019 kl. 19:22 skrev Adrien Grand :
>
> Hello,
>
> Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
> Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between
> 7.0 and
Hi Shawn,
If I ask the question the other way around: what does it buy us to
keep Java 8 as a minimum version requirement for Lucene/Solr 9.0? This
would only be helpful to users who can afford to upgrade to the latest
Lucene/Solr release but can't use a JDK version that will be about 2
years old
On 3/19/2019 12:22 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between
7.0 and 8.0, so if we assume a similar interval between 8.0 and 9.0
that would mean releasing 9.0 about 2 years
+1
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:53 PM Adrien Grand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
> Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between
> 7.0 and 8.0, so if we assume a similar interval between 8.0 and 9.0
> that would
Adrien Grand
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 7:23 PM
>> To: Lucene Dev
>> Subject: [VOTE] Master/9.0 to require Java 11
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
>> Java 11 for 9.0, current
the
Future* classes.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Adrien Grand
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 7:23 PM
> To: Lucene Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Master/9.0 to require Java 11
>
+1
> On 19 Mar 2019, at 18:22, Adrien Grand wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
> Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between
> 7.0 and 8.0, so if we assume a similar interval between 8.0 and 9.0
> that would
Hello,
Now that Lucene/Solr 8.0 has shipped I'd like us to consider requiring
Java 11 for 9.0, currently the master branch. We had 18 months between
7.0 and 8.0, so if we assume a similar interval between 8.0 and 9.0
that would mean releasing 9.0 about 2 years after Java 11, which
sounds like a
15 matches
Mail list logo
