<http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de>
From: Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com <mailto:romseyg...@gmail.com> >
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 4:06 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release L
<http://www.thetaphi.de/>
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 9:20 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.3.0 RC1
Smoke test success: SUCCESS! [1:04:19.586886]
But +1 to fix running on J
SUCCESS! [1:42:33.742651]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Alan Woodward wrote:
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.3.0-RC1-
>
>> 10:
>>>
>>> Java 8 and 9 started up (yeah), but Java 10 failed (at least on windows)
>>> because of the braindead version parsing:
>>>
>>> C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Desktop\solr-7.3.0\bin>solr start -e techproducts
ROR: Java 1.8 or later is required to run Solr. Current Java version is: 10
>>
>> I will open an issue to fix this (or better: let’s simply remove the version
>> check as it cannot be made safe with shell scripting).
>>
>>
ts Linux (not yet tested).
> ******************
>
> Sorry,
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de <http://www.thetaphi.de/>
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de <mailto:u...@thetaphi.de>
Hi Alan,
I noticed your ant-related commit, but wondered how this passed for
everyone else -- did you guys run smoke tester from branch_7x?
Shouldn't we use the actual version's branch for this?
D.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Array
>>> index out of range: 10
>>>
>>>at java.base/java.util.Arrays.rangeCheck(Arrays.java:122)
>>>
>>> at java.base/java.util.Arrays.compareUnsigned(Arrays.java:6101)
&g
;>
>> at Test.main(Test.java:7)
>>
>>
>>
>> So all looks fine from this perspective.
>>
>>
>>
>> I then tested to start the techproducts example with Java 8, Java 9, Java
>> 10:
>>
>>
>>
>> Java 8 and 9 start
is required to run Solr. Current Java version is:
> 10
>
>
>
> I will open an issue to fix this (or better: let’s simply remove the
> version check as it cannot be made safe with shell scripting).
>
>
>
> **
>
> So -
From: Alan Woodward <romseyg...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 4:06 PM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 7.3.0 RC1
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/d
+1
Docs, javadocs, and CHANGES look good.
Smoke tester says: SUCCESS! [0:54:11.928252]
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Mar 26, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Alan Woodward wrote:
>
> Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.3.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.3.0-RC1-reveb8a5a882f879a51389b5d43f74f3aceac9e68c9
Please vote for release candidate 1 for Lucene/Solr 7.3.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.3.0-RC1-reveb8a5a882f879a51389b5d43f74f3aceac9e68c9
14 matches
Mail list logo