I've repeated Sebastiano's experiments (and so did he). A few quotes
from the communication.
The index appears to be larger now--43.1GB. Probably they have better
skipping structures that take more space.
From what I can see the format is the same as before--the .frq file contains
document
I can understand these quotes. what's the conclusion from your communication?
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Dawid Weiss
dawid.we...@cs.put.poznan.pl wrote:
I've repeated Sebastiano's experiments (and so did he). A few quotes
from the communication.
The index appears to be larger
That 4.0 is significantly faster than 3.6 for this benchmark and there
were minor glitches in the benchmarking code itself.
Dawid
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Li Li fancye...@gmail.com wrote:
I can understand these quotes. what's the conclusion from your communication?
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012
I reviewed the benchmarking code on his website very quickly:
* I don't like his NullCollector, it sets acceptsDocsOutOfOrder() =
false, but its doing nothing but counting. By returning false here, he
is declaring that the collector cares about docid order (which it
doesnt), and preventing the
Fyi. I contacted Sebastiano and will get hold of the data set and
benchmarks he used to repeat his experiment with current trunk
(curiosity). Any hints on which configuration should be used will be
welcome.
Dawid
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Li Li fancye...@gmail.com wrote:
