Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core [master] #581 failed (Tests failed: 4 (2
new), passed: 2458, ignored: 107).
Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent01
Build results:
http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=216400=LuceneNet_Core
Failed Tests Summary:
Newly failed tests (2 tests,
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core [master] #580 failed (Tests failed: 5 (3
new), passed: 2457, ignored: 107).
Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent02
Build results:
http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=216395=LuceneNet_Core
Failed Tests Summary:
Newly failed tests (3 tests,
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core [master] #577 failed (Tests failed: 2 (1
new), passed: 2460, ignored: 107).
Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent01
Build results:
http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=216388=LuceneNet_Core
Failed Tests Summary:
Newly failed tests (1 test,
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core Focused Tests [master] #174 successful .
Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent02
Build results:
http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=216397=LuceneNet_LuceneNetCoreFailingTests
Changes included (4 changes)
Github user synhershko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/167#issuecomment-213849508
Thanks, merged. On your next PR, please work on a branch, it is an ill
practice in git to merge from someone else's master.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/167
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Core Focused Tests [master] #171 successful .
Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent02
Build results:
http://teamcity.codebetter.com/viewLog.html?buildId=216390=LuceneNet_LuceneNetCoreFailingTests
Changes included (5 changes)
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/168
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user eladmarg commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/168#discussion_r60835981
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Core/Support/AtomicObject.cs ---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+using System;
+using System.Threading;
+
+namespace
Github user synhershko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/168#issuecomment-213845719
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user EMaher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/168#issuecomment-213839959
OK. Suggested changes have been made. I also verified that passing tests
continue to pass, especially the ones that used to use AtomicReference.
---
If your
Github user EMaher commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/168#discussion_r60832211
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Index/TestIndexWriterWithThreads.cs ---
@@ -726,15 +724,15 @@ public override void Run()
Github user EMaher commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/168#discussion_r60832185
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Index/TestIndexWriterWithThreads.cs ---
@@ -657,7 +655,7 @@ public virtual void TestRollbackAndCommitWithThreads()
Github user conniey commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/168#discussion_r60831857
--- Diff: src/Lucene.Net.Tests/core/Index/TestIndexWriterWithThreads.cs ---
@@ -657,7 +655,7 @@ public virtual void TestRollbackAndCommitWithThreads()
Build Lucene.NET :: Lucene.NET Nightly [master] #571 failed (Tests failed: 85
(4 new), passed: 2816, ignored: 117; snapshot dependency failed: ... Lucene.NET
Core).
Agent: JetBrains-dotnet-agent01
Build results:
15 matches
Mail list logo