Github user pvginkel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
Sure, no problem:
private void ReplaceStaleFiles(FSDirectory fsDirectory)
{
// Work around for https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205.
var
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
> I am currently working around this using reflection, so for me it's fine.
Peter, could you please post your workaround here in case other users need
it?
---
If your project is set
Github user pvginkel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
I've removed the `[Ignore]` attribute and left the timeout as is.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
> OK. So I should remove the `[Ignore]` attribute then?
Yes. We should only use the `[Ignore]` attribute in cases where the test
takes > 30 minutes and must be run manually, or was
Github user pvginkel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
OK. So I should remove the `[Ignore]` attribute then?
The only question I still have is about the timeout. In my tests, if it
would test, it would test rather quickly. At the moment I
Github user synhershko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
This is a great test - and as it happens many bugs in Apache Lucene (Java),
even very severe ones, were caught using a randomized testing framework, which
by definition is not deterministic.
Github user pvginkel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
I have, but this is a problematic one. This depends on a race condition,
which is non-deterministic by definition.
The test case I created runs a few threads for a few seconds and fails
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
@pvginkel
Could you add a test to this PR in the [TestDirectory
Github user pvginkel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
I am currently working around this using reflection, so for me it's fine.
However, this is causing real problems. I wrote a prototype which is
indexing using 4 threads, a thread that
Github user NightOwl888 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
@synhershko
Not without cancelling the vote and starting over (for the 3rd time) - we
have only 12 hours left on the current vote. I suspect there will be several
issues such as
Github user synhershko commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/pull/205
Good catch, thanks!
@NightOwl888 can we get this to the beta version before it's released?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
11 matches
Mail list logo
