of the comments from the previous release was a
> preference towards a signature with an Apache id. Since Satoshi-san is not
> an Apache committer yet, I took care of the signing process.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orhan Kislal
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@a
adlib-test-build/badge/
Cheers,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
to
track down this issue. Any helpful tips and tricks are greatly appreciated.
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
ave access to this
service, but I suggest there are at least a few to assist with its
maintenance.
Who on the team currently has access to the Apache Jenkins service?
-=e
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> FYI: The manually triggered Jenkins master bu
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1103 (Remove pyxb GPL
workaround) is dependent on the release of PyXB 1.2.6 (which is currently
not scheduled). I'm inclined to move it to v2.0 and we can revisit at a
later point. Thoughts?
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
.io>
wrote:
> Ed,
>
> I would suggest v2.0 for the next version, so you can add those 2 JIRAs to
> v2.0
>
> Once we get v1.12 out the door I was going to solicit comments from the
> community on v2.0 features so we can get that backlog going.
>
> Frank
>
> On Mon, A
does not compile
with gcc 6.2
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1145 - Ubuntu 16.04 - Using
GCC 5 (default gcc) causes Postgres 9.6 crash
Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
Regards
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
MADlib dev,
We are winding down the number of outstanding issues for the Apache MADlib
v1.12 release. The one outstanding issue is
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1091. Once this is resolved,
I'm hoping to start the release process.
Regards,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
FYI: The manually triggered Jenkins master build passed:
https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/MADlib/job/madlib-master-build/80/
-=e
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> Not sure what caused the MADlib master build to fail (git clone issue?). I
com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/161
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/163
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
be staring me
in the face so I apologize if it is. Any guidance is greatly appreciated.
-=e
p.s. And yes, this is in preparation for my v1.12 release manager role.
Gaining context comes at a price.
--
*Ed Espino*
#topic9
link references:
MADlib web site is at http://madlib.incubator.apache.org/
MADlib documentation is at
http://madlib.incubator.apache.org/documentation.html
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
; > ... that's a very nice gesture-
> >
> > I'm only a lurker on this mailing list but I'm a PMC on a couple of other
> > projects- would be happy to take you up if these folks don't :D
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Ed Espino <esp.
> after the next ASF board meeting, which is scheduled for July 19, 2017. The
> reason is that MADlib graduation is on the agenda for the ASF meeting and
> hopefully it will pass fine. So I suggest the new release date for 1.12 is
> Aug 4, a couple weeks or so later. I updated the release date
. :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12331451
Please take a quick look and let me know what you think. I can easily
adjust the dashboards if needed.
Regards,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
quick MADlib metrics dashboard. It appears there is a bit of
> Jira legacy history with the project. :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12331451
>
> Please take a quick look and let me know what you think. I can easily
> adjust the dashboards if needed.
>
> Regards,
> -=e
>
>
> --
> *Ed Espino*
>
--
*Ed Espino*
> :)
>
> NJ
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > NJ,
> >
> > I spent about an hour getting it setup on my mac. This supported the
> > MLP PR review. I threw some info together below.
> >
> > Hope it
wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> We haven't set that up for MADlib yet, but we will be looking into it soon.
> Any ideas?
>
> NJ
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:00 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity, do MADlib developers regularly use code coverage
> > utilities to measure the coverage quality of their tests?
> >
> > -=e
> >
> > --
> > *Ed Espino*
> >
>
--
*Ed Espino*
Out of curiosity, do MADlib developers regularly use code coverage
utilities to measure the coverage quality of their tests?
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sure NJ,
>
> I'll create both (Jira and PR).
>
> -=e
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Nandish Jayaram <njaya...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you Ed, this is great. We will cr
Thanks,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
It'll be great if you could share your experiences
> with it. Will go well with
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/pull/151.
>
> NJ
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > MADlib dev,
> >
> >
/jira/browse/MADLIB-1133
>
> based on your findings.
>
> All of these TLP related stories are under the epic
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1112
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Frank,
> >
spend a bit more time on
this to see if I can identify what the subtleties are between the supported
platforms and Ubuntu.
Cheers,
-=e
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> For MADLIB-1068, I have reproduced the elastic_net issue which causes a
> cras
to be very
> relevant to one of the post graduation JIRAs (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MADLIB-1132), and I was a little
> confused about the order of doing things here.
> Should we merge PR #158 before or after MADLIB-1132 is addressed?
>
> NJ
>
--
*Ed Espino*
th
GCC 5.x, 6.x and 7.x versions. There are distros in this list where finding
a readily available GCC 4.x version isn't straight forward and I
essentially had to revert to older distro versions. I can assist with
validation once the other GCC versions (5, 6 & 7) are supported.
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
updates as needed.
Cheers,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
MADLIB-1133 is currently assigned to Frank McQuillan. I'd like to take a
quick swing at this and generate a PR. Does anyone know if there has been
any work performed on this task?
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
lib/job/madlib-pr-build/
--
*Ed Espino*
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
;
> A recent email from Roman (
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> dev/201708.mbox/%3cCA+ULb+vP0ViWH4Nc=4eaXvbT0KOmeFtQzp4eAa3p0fKPP7c
> 8...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> )
> gave us another option in Gitbox for our source code repo.
>
> Does anybody in the community have any preferences/suggestions on
> moving to Gitbox?
>
> NJ
>
--
*Ed Espino*
t;
> NJ
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I believe there is another git repo "incubator-madlib-site" (pair) that
> > needs to be migrated as well:
> >
> > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=in
ithub.com/apache/incubator-madlib/
> and https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.git). Any
> idea how to go about this process?
>
> NJ
>
--
*Ed Espino*
easier
than I originally envisioned. If anyone needs assistance with the setup,
please don't hesitate to ping me.
Happy MADilb Debugging,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
haposhnik.org>
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> > While I was trying to track down the cause of MADLIB-1068, I managed to
> put
> > Postgres/MADlib under the debugger (gdb) and thought the configuration
> > would be of some
I have resolved MADLIB-1068 with a workaround (use GCC 4 and not the
default GCC 5) for Ubuntu 16.04. I have created MADLIB-1145 to track the
GCC 5 issue.
Happy Monday,
-=e
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> FYI: I have managed to get the issue to
ins account have a look at
> it please?
>
> NJ
>
--
*Ed Espino*
andish Jayaram <njaya...@pivotal.io>
wrote:
> Thank you for investigating it Ed. :)
>
> NJ
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > NJ,
> >
> > I took a quick look at the build console output and it appears &
for now.
> > If we get more information from the customer we can reopen it, but for
> now
> > we will do nothing.
> >
> > CS
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 9:41 AM Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > We have one outstanding Apac
nformation in the section
and looking for guidance and confirmation of my understanding of the
convenience binary build environments.
We're almost there!
Cheerios,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
; > I will undoubtedly be contributing additional information in the
> section
> > > and looking for guidance and confirmation of my understanding of the
> > > convenience binary build environments.
> > >
> > > We're almost there!
> > >
> > > Cheerios,
> > > -=e
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Ed Espino*
> > >
> >
>
--
*Ed Espino*
ierra)
Thanks,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
;>> module,
> > > >>>>>>>> utility to unnest 2-D arrays into rows of 1-D arrays)
> > > >>>>>>>> * platform updates (GPDB 5)
> > > >>>>>>>> * updates for Apache Top Level Project readiness and build
> > > >>>>>>>> process
> > > >> on
> > > >>>>>>>> Apache infrastructure
> > > >>>>>>>> * bug fixes
> > > >>>>>>>> * doc improvements
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/
> MADlib+1.11
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> *** Please download, review and vote by Thu May 04, 2017 @
> > > >>>>>>>> 6pm PDT
> > > >>>>> ***
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> We're voting upon the source (tag): rc/1.11-rc1
> > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/tree/rc/1.11-rc1
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Source Files:
> > > >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.
> > > >>>>>>>> 11-incubating-rc1/
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Commit to be voted upon:
> > > >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > > >>>>>>>> 0ff829a7060d08f284e8468ebf35c31b6e231d58
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > > >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> To help in tallying the vote, PMC members please be sure to
> > > >>>>>>>> indicate "(binding)" with the vote.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > > >>>>>>>> Rashmi Raghu
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>>> Rashmi Raghu, Ph.D.
> > > >>>>>>>> Pivotal Data Science
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Ivan Novick
> > > > Product Manager Pivotal Greenplum
> > > > https://www.youtube.com/GreenplumDatabase
> >
> >
>
> --
> *Ed Espino*
>
observations (for rc1 & rc2).
I want to thank the community for allowing me to participate.
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
wrote:
> I just want to comment on a couple items raised in the RC1 and RC2 votes
> that pertain to R
I have taken a quick look at the DMG and a Linux RPM binary artifacts
(sorry haven't had time to build and/or test the binaries yet). But this
info might be of some benefit to the team sooner than later.
Regards,
-=e
--
*Ed Espino
ase/incubator/madlib/1.10.0-incubating/)
and was surprised to find binary files as well (this also applies to 1.9 &
1.9.1). Shouldn't the binary files have been voted on by the community
before being added to the release area on the dist server?
-=e
--
*Ed Espino*
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:
46 matches
Mail list logo
