RE: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dimanche 19 mars 2006 02:38 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee [snip] I also don't like the idea of making it obligatory to assign an issue for closing or setting a

Re: [vote] [m1] PMD plugin v1.8 for maven 1.x

2006-03-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
+1 Stéphane On 3/18/06, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, We are ready to release a new version of the PMD plugin. All bugs issues are solved and there's only one enhancement opened in Jira. Changes in this version include: New Features: o New property

Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Lukas Theussl
I think you misunderstood my point. It was not at all about opening issues. In brief, I want to be able to set a fix for version (eg because somebody attaches a patch, or to set up a roadmap) without having to assign the issue (eg because I don't have time right now to test the patch, and I

RE: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Lukas Theussl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dimanche 19 mars 2006 18:46 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee I think you misunderstood my point. It was not at all about opening issues. In brief, I want to be able

Re: Jira - Issues closed without assignee

2006-03-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
On 3/18/06, Arnaud HERITIER [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIP Actually I believe we should simply configure jira to not allow an issue to be closed without an assignee. The same should apply for not specifying a fix for field, etc. Those fields should be defined as mandatory. Not sure

[result] Re: [vote] Bring plugins to Maven

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
Sorry for getting sidetracked: +1: Lukas, Vincent S, Emmanuel, Stephane, Raphael, Fabrizio, Kenney, Yann, Mike, John, Carlos (all but dep), Arnaud +0: Vincent M, Carlos (dep) I'll get this happening. - Brett Brett Porter wrote: A month ago I sent a proposal for discussion, to bring some mojos

[result] Re: [vote] Fabrice Bellingard as a plugins committer

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
+1: Vincent, Vincent, Emmanuel, Stephane, Edwin, Arnaud, Allan, Fabrizio, Mike, John, Brett, Lukas I'll follow up. - Brett Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Fabrice worked on the JXR plugin, fixed a number of bugs in the original library and improved the mojo. Active on the users list, with a

[result] Re: [vote] Brian Fox as a plugins committer

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
+1: Vincent, Vincent, Emmanuel, Stephane, Edwin, Arnaud, Allan, Fabrizio, Mike, John, Brett, Lukas - Brett Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Brian has done a great job in keeping the mojo project in order and has developed the dependency plugin there, which we previously indicated we'd like to have

Re: [vote] [m1] PMD plugin v1.8 for maven 1.x

2006-03-19 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi all, We are ready to release a new version of the PMD plugin. All bugs issues are solved and there's only one enhancement opened in Jira. Changes in this version include: New Features: o New property maven.pmd.targetjdk to define the target JDK.

Re: Maven tutorial

2006-03-19 Thread Brett Porter
I plan to take a look when I get some time. The important things I'd keep in mind: - don't just reproduce documentation that already exists (like installation instructions). The last attempt at a tutorial on the wiki did this and then just petered out as it wasn't very useful. This doesn't appear

Re: Maven tutorial

2006-03-19 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Thank Brett, I'll do my best. In the first part, where I explain basic concepts, I sometimes reproduce some of the already existing content but I always try to make the explanations clearer and add some details. Sometimes the existing documentation is good but presented in a very rude way. And