Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Now, we have only one issue to fix and all issues assigned to 1.0 will be fixed :) I added two development guide in the site, it would be cool if you can look at it. Emmanuel As you might have seen by the commits, I have read through the new docs and made

Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Dennis Lundberg a écrit : Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Now, we have only one issue to fix and all issues assigned to 1.0 will be fixed :) I added two development guide in the site, it would be cool if you can look at it. Emmanuel As you might have seen by the commits, I have read

Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Now, we have only one issue to fix and all issues assigned to 1.0 will be fixed :) When building the site I noticed that Maven SCM is using modello-maven-plugin 1.0-alpha-6, which is quite old. It is used for the settings in provider implementations. The latest

Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Dennis Lundberg a écrit : Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Now, we have only one issue to fix and all issues assigned to 1.0 will be fixed :) When building the site I noticed that Maven SCM is using modello-maven-plugin 1.0-alpha-6, which is quite old. It is used for the settings in provider

Re: Post 1.0 release process

2007-03-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Mar 07, at 12:30 PM 27 Mar 07, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I describe there (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SCM/Maven-SCM +Release+Process) the release process and scm structure I'd want to use after the release of 1.0. We should do something similar across the board whatever

Re: Post 1.0 release process

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
On 28/03/2007, at 7:51 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: On 27 Mar 07, at 12:30 PM 27 Mar 07, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I describe there (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SCM/Maven-SCM +Release+Process) the release process and scm structure I'd want to use after the release of 1.0. This is

Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
I think it's definitely time for another beta ASAP. For 1.0, I'd still like to review (if not include) the following JIRAs. High priority: - SCM-17: I think the test structure needs some review, and we need to ensure all unit tests run fast and without the software installed. The TCK should

Re: We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
On 28/03/2007, at 2:37 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: I added two development guide in the site, it would be cool if you can look at it. The docs look good - thanks for that. I have some questions about the SCM manager part: it's unclear about how getScmManager is used. It looks like

Re: [vote] release maven-source-plugin 2.0.3

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
On 26/03/2007, at 3:38 PM, Stephane Nicoll wrote: Also, shouldn't trunk be reverted to 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT and the tag deleted since we've rejected the staged release? Correct. I thought Jason did it. I've done this now. - Brett

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel Jason van Zyl a écrit : Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
+1 Fabrice. On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

[Result] [vote] [m1] plugin releases

2007-03-27 Thread Lukas Theussl
This vote passed with 3 binding (Arnaud, Jason, Lukas) and one non-binding (Jeff) +1s. Thanks to those who voted, I'll do the releases soon. -Lukas Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi, These are the plugins that do not need the updated maven-model, so I'd like to release them already:

Re: [vote][m1] release modello plugin 1.0

2007-03-27 Thread Lukas Theussl
I just updated the license headers, +1 now for the release and to move it out of the sandbox. Thanks! -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi, I think that it is the time to release the modello plugin for maven 1.x in version 1.0. This plugin allows to use modello (1.0-alpha-15) inside a maven

Re: [m1] maven-model ... on the starting blocks....

2007-03-27 Thread Lukas Theussl
+1 to your plans. (However, I couldn't see how your ref.[1] illustrates the new pom features?) -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi, With release of the modello plugin we'll be able in some days to release the new version of the maven-model for maven 1.x. This new release includes

RE: Maven classpath order

2007-03-27 Thread coding
I tried running it on LINUX and Windows both. I get the same behavior of inconsistency... it has become a critical issue for my usage of maven because in my implementation I override a lot of classes definition with different jar names and want them to appear one after another... Can I control

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan On Monday 26 March 2007 22:55, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-4 AND maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2

2007-03-27 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2007/3/25, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-4 and the shared maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2 that it depends on. Tags: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-plug in-2.0-alpha-4/

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2007/3/26, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Jerome Lacoste
On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Mar 07, at 8:55 AM 27 Mar 07, Jerome Lacoste wrote: On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Andrew Williams
+1 I have discovered a very small issue with it to do with bad error messages but it is not regression, so I say go ahead too. Issue filed in JIRA set for 2.0.7 ;) Andy On 27 Mar 2007, at 03:55, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here:

Re: [vote][m1] release modello plugin 1.0

2007-03-27 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
thanks for the headers. I forgot. You have an automatic script for that ? Arnaud On 27/03/07, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just updated the license headers, +1 now for the release and to move it out of the sandbox. Thanks! -Lukas Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi, I think that it

Re: [m1] maven-model ... on the starting blocks....

2007-03-27 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Yes ;-) The original pom is here : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/maven-1/plugins/trunk/linkcheck/project.xml You can see that we removed the extend and updated informations coming from it. It works also with xml entities even if I don't have an example here. Arnaud On 27/03/07, Lukas

Re: [vote][m1] release modello plugin 1.0

2007-03-27 Thread Lukas Theussl
I used the scripts mentioned at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html, in particular copy2license.pl and update-AL20.pl. However, they are not fool-proof, at least I couldn't get them to work generally for all files, so you always have to check manually if it worked ok. If somebody

Re: [jira] Created: (SCM-292) Replace DEFAULT_CLIENTSPEC_PROPERTY system property by a map to store in memory clientspec names

2007-03-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Mike, Can you look at it in next days. I'd like to release Maven-SCM 1.0 and I think this issue need to be fixed. Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse (JIRA) a écrit : Replace DEFAULT_CLIENTSPEC_PROPERTY system property by a map to store in memory clientspec names

Re: [vote][m1] release modello plugin 1.0

2007-03-27 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
ok, i'll try to think to do it before to propose another vote. thx Arnaud On 27/03/07, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I used the scripts mentioned at http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html, in particular copy2license.pl and update-AL20.pl. However, they are not fool-proof, at

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-27 Thread David J. M. Karlsen
Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build first: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just wanted to get a little more feedback. Fails on surefire reports:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread John Casey
+1 On 3/27/07, Andrew Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 I have discovered a very small issue with it to do with bad error messages but it is not regression, so I say go ahead too. Issue filed in JIRA set for 2.0.7 ;) Andy On 27 Mar 2007, at 03:55, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The roadmap

Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-4 AND maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2

2007-03-27 Thread John Casey
+1 On 3/27/07, Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Vincent 2007/3/25, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-4 and the shared maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2 that it depends on. Tags:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Carlos Sanchez
+1 On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-27 Thread Patrick Schneider
Have you tried the staged released from yesterday night? Jason -- are these these stages the same? On 3/27/07, David J. M. Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build first:

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-27 Thread David J. M. Karlsen
David J. M. Karlsen wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build first: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just wanted to get a little more feedback.

RE: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
Based on the date, they are not. The correct one is in the staged repo listed in the vote email. -Original Message- From: Patrick Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:26 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check Have you tried the

Post 1.0 release process

2007-03-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Hi, I describe there (http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SCM/Maven-SCM+Release+Process) the release process and scm structure I'd want to use after the release of 1.0. Emmanuel

We're near the release of 1.0 final

2007-03-27 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Hi, Now, we have only one issue to fix and all issues assigned to 1.0 will be fixed :) I added two development guide in the site, it would be cool if you can look at it. Emmanuel

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Patrick Schneider
+1 On 3/27/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1 On 3/27/07, Patrick Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 3/27/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On 3/26/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Fabrizio Giustina
+1 fabrizio On 3/27/07, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Jorg Heymans
Jason van Zyl wrote: The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository: http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/staging-repository/maven-2.0.6/ And the distros you are interested in are here:

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-27 Thread David J. M. Karlsen
David J. M. Karlsen skrev: Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build first: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just wanted to get a little more feedback.

RE: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1. Thanks for successfully navigating the nine circles of hell to make this happen ;-) -Original Message- From: Jason van Zyl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:00 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6 Hi, The roadmap is here:

Build ext to force a custom http wagon to be used...

2007-03-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Is there anyway to use a build extension that provides a custom org.apache.maven.wagon.Wagon role with a http role-hint to be used instead of whatever wagon-http which Maven defaults to using? Or is there a way to install a build extension which will result in the container creating a new

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-27 Thread Max Bowsher
David J. M. Karlsen wrote: I'm getting another issue on another project. It builds fine on maven 2.0.5, with the snapshot I get a problem with xdoclet - see the attached log. this realm = app0.child-container[org.codehaus.mojo:xdoclet-maven-plugin] ... urls[10] =

Re: [vote][m1] release modello plugin 1.0

2007-03-27 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Arnaud HERITIER wrote: thanks for the headers. I forgot. You have an automatic script for that ? If you're using IDEA you can use the Copyright plugin [1] together with a special configuration [2]. That helps to ease the pain a bit. [1] http://plugins.intellij.net/plugin/?id=88 [2]

Re: 2.0.6 Pre flight check

2007-03-27 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 27 Mar 07, at 12:11 PM 27 Mar 07, David J. M. Karlsen wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, Before I staged the release I just wanted to get some people to a build first: http://idisk.maven.org/jvanzyl/Public/maven/ Brian, Jason Dillon, and Dan Kulp have tried their builds and I just

Re: undeclared dependencies in plugins

2007-03-27 Thread Jason Dillon
Hey, how exactly does one run this? --jason On Mar 23, 2007, at 3:56 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: As part of the checking for 2.0.6, I ran dependency:analyze against the plugins. We found that almost all plugins have undeclared dependencies. Those with undeclared dependencies on plexus-utils

HowTo avoid version number in filenames

2007-03-27 Thread Pant, Dheeraj
Hi, Using Maven generates all the artifacts (jars/wars/ears) with a unique filename artifactid-version.type. How do we remove the version number from the filenames? I need a generic way to do this, because we have many sub-modules and would like to have a common solution that can be

RE: undeclared dependencies in plugins

2007-03-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/usage.html bottom of the page. -Original Message- From: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dillon Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 5:58 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: undeclared dependencies in plugins

RE: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-4 AND maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-2

2007-03-27 Thread Brian E. Fox
Vote results: Binding: +6 (Vincent,John,Jason,Stephane,Joakim,Emmanuel) Non Binding: +4 (Dan,Andy,Arnaud,Brian) I'll proceed with the release. Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: Brian E. Fox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 1:22 AM To: Maven Developers List

Re: HowTo avoid version number in filenames

2007-03-27 Thread Ralph Goers
Just curious, but I'm interested in why you want to do this. It drives me nuts when I get a product such as Jboss and I can't figure out what version it is using just by looking at the file name. OTOH, I'd be just as happy to run a command line program that could accurately tell me the

Re: HowTo avoid version number in filenames

2007-03-27 Thread Franz Allan Valencia See
Good day to you, Dheeraj, Try project ... build finalName${artifactId}/finalName ... /build ... /project By default, the value of finalName is ${artifactId}-${version} ( without the quotes ) which every pom inherits from the super pom ( see [1] ). ..btw, you might want to try asking

[vote] maven-app-configuration and maven-shared-component parent release

2007-03-27 Thread Jesse McConnell
As part of the prepwork for getting an actual continuum alpha release out I need to get a few more dependencies released, one of them is the maven-app-configuration. And since the currently released parent version is out of date with regards to the new release setup I have to release that as

Re: [vote] maven-app-configuration and maven-shared-component parent release

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
+1 On 28/03/2007, at 11:58 AM, Jesse McConnell wrote: As part of the prepwork for getting an actual continuum alpha release out I need to get a few more dependencies released, one of them is the maven-app-configuration. And since the currently released parent version is out of date with

Re: [vote] maven-app-configuration and maven-shared-component parent release

2007-03-27 Thread Maria Odea Ching
+1 :) Jesse McConnell wrote: As part of the prepwork for getting an actual continuum alpha release out I need to get a few more dependencies released, one of them is the maven-app-configuration. And since the currently released parent version is out of date with regards to the new release

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Brett Porter
Tested ok here. +1 On 27/03/2007, at 12:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/tags/maven-2.0.6/ Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 2.0.6

2007-03-27 Thread Eric Redmond
+1 On 3/27/07, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tested ok here. +1 On 27/03/2007, at 12:55 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Hi, The roadmap is here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa? reset=truepid=10500fixfor=13010 The tag is here: