>NUnit includes their key for
>signing within the build source, but I tend to think we should use our
own
>key so that people can verify the source of the assembly.
I agree that if you rebuild, it should use the actual builder's key for
signing. Including the key with the source seems to defeat th
On Jan 3, 2008 10:20 AM, Jerome Lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2008 9:17 AM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1
>
> +1 from a happy user.
This vote has passed, right ?
Jerome
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Thanks.
I will do that.
And I will try to work on this license header removing.
But currently units failed in the release project due to this (on a
windows laptop but not on a solaris box). (weird) (can someone with a
windows confirms this or I have a real issue on my laptop :-) ).
I suspect an ind
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Ok (in fact license header was not here even before release).
Yes it was there before the first release cycle. I caught it in the
commit email:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-jar-plugin/pom.xml?r1=610166&r2=610863&diff_form
To provide some context on this, we are now using standard artifact
resolvers for .NET assemblies and require that the filename of an assembly
contain the version. This filename is also an attribute within the manifest
of the library assembly and needs to match the actual filename of the
artifact.
That depends on the answer to #1, below. If we don't need to re-sign the
assembly ourself, then we can simply deploy the framework assembly that
comes with their install. If we do want to re-sign, then we can re-assembly
it ourself.
Thanks,
Evan
On Jan 11, 2008 2:28 PM, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PR
Who created the NUnit assembly?
As is from them, or something you augmented?
On 11-Jan-08, at 11:34 AM, Evan Worley wrote:
Hello All,
If anyone can help on the questions below, it would be greatly
appreciated.
Thank you,
Evan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Evan Worley <[EM
Hello All,
If anyone can help on the questions below, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Evan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 10, 2008 7:42 PM
Subject: Deploying nunit framework assembly to a public repository
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 10, 2008 6:33 PM, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hilco, I'll have to take a deeper look, it's possible that I missed some
> other cases. I had to manually read and interpret the poms since I
> couldn't get them unmolested from the core. Can you open a jira and
> attach a sample so
+1
Vincent
2008/1/10, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd like to release maven-common-artifact-filters 1.0
>
>
>
> This contains some of the shared filters moved out of maven artifact and
> also the filters previously contained by the dependency plugin.
>
>
>
> The release is staged at:
> ht
Hi,
Heinrich Nirschl wrote:
>
> Maybe the intention was to base relative file names at basedir? This
> should however be done correctly of course.
>
I recently filled in a JIRA issue with a patch for this (
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLEAN-31 MCLEAN-31 ). You are invited to
review it an
11 matches
Mail list logo
