Issue Subscription
Filter: Design & Best Practices (29 issues)
Subscriber: mavendevlist
Key Summary
MNG-2184Possible problem with @aggregator and forked lifecycles
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2184
MNG-3313NetBeans projects, more than ant project, more than fre
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Yep see for instance MJAVADOC-171
Based on some simple experiments on my machine, the fix for this is simply
to drop @aggregator; it's broken... (at least for reporting plugins that
fork lifecycles like javadoc, jxr and surefire), and its effect can be
easily simulate
Oups my bad you're right.
I will revert this.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2008/2/7, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't understand this change. Aren't these two configuration
> parameters mutually exclusive?
>
> / Says to use this manifest file
> Says to use a manifest file from the default
>
I don't understand this change. Aren't these two configuration
parameters mutually exclusive?
/ Says to use this manifest file
Says to use a manifest file from the default
location
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Wed Feb 6 15:15:16 2008
New Revision: 619216
URL: http://svn.ap
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-mirror-settings.html
On Feb 7, 2008 10:39 AM, Tiffney, Lisa S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>
> Good afternoon
>
> I have a requirement to provide a mirror of
> http://repo1.maven.rg/maven2/ on our secure internal site.
>
> A c
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Good afternoon
I have a requirement to provide a mirror of
http://repo1.maven.rg/maven2/ on our secure internal site.
A couple of basic questions; can we receive permission to do this and
if so what is the easiest way to accomplish this. ( I am new at this).
What e
We know that the documentation, specially the javadoc, is not perfect,
present or uptodate.
Well, I feared that ;-) My primary goal was to stress that it would be worth
the pain to maintain the javadoc right from the beginning (instead of fixing
bugs afterwards). From my personal experience, wri
Sorry Raphael,
I meant to vote, but lost the mail thread. I'm +1 for an alpha release.
Thanks for the hard work!
-john
On Feb 6, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Raphaël Piéroni wrote:
Hi,
To sum up the vote for now:
Binding (PMC) : Arnaud
Non Binding (Committer) : Mauro (still not on the list), Milos,
maybe com.sun.org.apache.xmlsec
but doesnt really matter that much
On Feb 7, 2008 2:36 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need some jars from archived SUN WSDP (
> http://java.sun.com/webservices/downloads/1.5/index.html)
> What is the recommended groupId for such jars ?
+0
I'm concerned about the omission on ARCHETYPE-116 and -117 as they are
changes to existing behaviour (so, for example, the getting started
guide in the docs will be wrong). However, they are only minor
inconveniences so I think as long as alpha-2 is kept to the current
small set of iss
Hello,
I need some jars from archived SUN WSDP (
http://java.sun.com/webservices/downloads/1.5/index.html)
What is the recommended groupId for such jars ?
For example, xmlsec.jar is a sun-repackaged apache xml-security.
-> com.sun.xmlsec ?
-> com.sun.org.apache.xmlsec (repository allready contain
11 matches
Mail list logo
