Re: [vote] Release Archiva 1.0.2

2008-04-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Archiva 1.0.2 release candidate has been staged. ... [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... +0 - I've only had time to briefly try the .tar.gz distribution on OS X. No major issues but

Re: proxying snapshots was: [vote] Release Archiva 1.0.2

2008-04-07 Thread Brett Porter
On 07/04/2008, at 4:17 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote: On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Archiva 1.0.2 release candidate has been staged. ... [ ] +1 Release it! [ ] 0 [ ] -1 Don't release it, because... +0 - I've only had time to briefly try the

Re: proxying snapshots was: [vote] Release Archiva 1.0.2

2008-04-07 Thread Wendy Smoak
I don't know. If it's working for you then it's likely just misconfiguration here. I was trying to build both Struts 1 and Struts 2 with an empty local repo and /archiva/repository/snapshots proxying the Apache snapshots repo and possibly one at OpenSymphony. (Not sure if they've switched to an

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Please clarify the proposal. When you say source files, you mean things like Java files not POM files? Yes, source file is meant to refer to a plain text file that does not have an encoding declaration or similar like XML. XML is fine, it's ugly to parse but provides the user with means to

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
I'd like to know if this could also be achieved via toolchains. As Hervé already tried to explain, these two proposals have not too much in common. To my understanding, the toolchain proposal aims at providing a facade on a user's development kit (native tools, boot class path, etc.) such that

[VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Brian E. Fox
Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build. Release is staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brianf/stage-2.0.9

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Fabrice Bellingard
Just built my projects with this fresh 2.0.9, and everything went fine, so here's my +1 Thanks Brian! Cheers -- Fabrice - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi, Something I didn't understand. What will happen with MNG-3220 and maven version 2.0.9. How will they do with the new scope ? Arnaud On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates

Re: Common Bugs

2008-04-07 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
I wonder if it's worth posting these as a series under the developers section of the Maven site? Vincent and I had already put parts of this stuff onto [0] in a section named Some Pitfalls, together with a link to this mail thread. But I agree, having all of this in a nicely formatted APT doc

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Paul Benedict
My only concern is that the encoding kind of assumes one kind of source file. I am never in a position to have multiple encodings on my projects, but I suppose if you're compiling many differrent types of sources, people would want to tie the source to the extension type. Paul On Mon, Apr 7,

RE: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Brian E. Fox
It won't work, in fact I believe the pom won't parse. This is something we'll have to note in the release notes and we may want to prohibit these from going into central. -Original Message- From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 1:15 PM To: Maven

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Jason Dillon
+1 --jason On Apr 7, 2008, at 11:42 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build.

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2008/4/7, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 --jason On Apr 7, 2008, at 11:42 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread VELO
+1 On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Since the discussion on the list about Maven and encoding 2 weeks ago, Benjamin and I worked on a proposal to have: 1. a central point of configuration of sources encoding, to be used by each and every plugin,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
+1 It works fine on archetype plugin build. Raphaël 2008/4/7, Brian E. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Mauro Talevi
+1 Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build. Release is staged at:

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Asgeir S. Nilsen
2008/4/5, Hervé BOUTEMY [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Since the discussion on the list about Maven and encoding 2 weeks ago, Benjamin and I worked on a proposal to have: 1. a central point of configuration of sources encoding, to be used by each and every plugin, 2. a default value set to

[ANN] maven-alfresco-extension-archetype 1.0.0 released

2008-04-07 Thread Gabriele Columbro
Hi devs, hi users, my first post on maven lists (after several months in read only mode) to announce the release under Apache2 license of an archetype to build Alfresco [1] customizations with maven2. It was developed within Sourcesense [2] and provides the framework with a full m2 based

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread david
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build. Big +1 - both on the actual

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread david
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Brian E. Fox wrote: Forgot to mention that we had no problems with the latest RC - which was running all builds (including site-gen with a lot of plugins) on our CI server. The beta-6 of site plugin discovered an invalid site.xml which had passed before - but this is

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le lundi 07 avril 2008, Asgeir S. Nilsen a écrit : 2008/4/5, Hervé BOUTEMY [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, Since the discussion on the list about Maven and encoding 2 weeks ago, Benjamin and I worked on a proposal to have: 1. a central point of configuration of sources encoding, to be used by

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread John Casey
+1 -john On Apr 7, 2008, at 12:42 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build.

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le dimanche 06 avril 2008, Jason van Zyl a écrit : I specifically meant the core changes, but I would still recommending what Milos did which was to create branches for a few of the affected plugins to try it all together. ok, I created

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
ok, thus you have my +1 (I tested it on several projects) but : - We have to ensure that it can't happen on the central (can we add a control somewhere ?) - We have to clearly document it to be sure that users understand this impact if they want to use it in a corporate environment (they have also

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Sejal Patel
+1 from me. after a rocky start with those early RC having issues, seems you guys did great in resolving everything and making sure it all works great. cudos for a great release run and hard work to ensure integrity and quality went into this release. On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Arnaud

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Hervé Le lundi 07 avril 2008, Brian E. Fox a écrit : Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build.

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Rahul Thakur
+1, works fine for me. Rahul Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build. Release is

ANSI color logging in Maven

2008-04-07 Thread Rahul Thakur
Hello, I have opened an enhancement request for ANSI color logging for Maven here. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3507 I believe it would be a neat usability enhancement to Maven and make it much easier to skim through logging output on the console. Thoughts? Cheers, Rahul

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
Would being able to detect the encoding help with making this less complicated. Something JChardet? On 7-Apr-08, at 2:31 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le dimanche 06 avril 2008, Jason van Zyl a écrit : I specifically meant the core changes, but I would still recommending what Milos did which was

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 7-Apr-08, at 3:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Would being able to detect the encoding help with making this less complicated. Something JChardet? Sorry, something like JCharet: http://jchardet.sourceforge.net/ On 7-Apr-08, at 2:31 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le dimanche 06 avril 2008,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread James William Dumay
+1 This release is looking really good - thanks to everyone who made this release possible. James On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:42 -0400, Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9

Re: [VOTE] POM Element for Source File Encoding

2008-04-07 Thread Paul Benedict
In Commons Validator, we updated the DTD even in point releases. I don't see the harm in doing the same here. After all, if the POM is 4.0.0, why not create a 4.0.1? It sounds like Maven 2 will have a 4.1 version. Paul On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Jesse McConnell
+1 looks good to me! On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:21 PM, James William Dumay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 This release is looking really good - thanks to everyone who made this release possible. James On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 12:42 -0400, Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven

Re: ANSI color logging in Maven

2008-04-07 Thread Brett Porter
As long as it's optional (preferable enabled by detecting the capability of the terminal but able to be disabled), it'd be cool. Not really a high priority, but if someone is able to work on it, it'd be great :) - Brett On 08/04/2008, at 8:40 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote: Hello, I have

Re: ANSI color logging in Maven

2008-04-07 Thread James William Dumay
Rahul, Something like this library might help you in your quest... http://sourceforge.net/projects/javacurses/ James On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 10:40 +1200, Rahul Thakur wrote: Hello, I have opened an enhancement request for ANSI color logging for Maven here.

RE: ANSI color logging in Maven

2008-04-07 Thread Brian E. Fox
I thought Eric had something hacked up at one point? -Original Message- From: James William Dumay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:22 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: ANSI color logging in Maven Rahul, Something like this library might help you in your

Re: ANSI color logging in Maven

2008-04-07 Thread Rahul Thakur
Not sure about Eric, but Andrew Williams did some work under Plexus sandbox. Rahul Brian E. Fox wrote: I thought Eric had something hacked up at one point? -Original Message- From: James William Dumay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:22 PM To: Maven

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.0.9

2008-04-07 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 7-Apr-08, at 9:42 AM, Brian E. Fox wrote: Time to vote on the final Maven 2.0.9 Release. We went through 8 Release Candidates and fixed all know regressions from 2.0.8 to 2.0.9 during that time. Note that there were no source changes between RC8 and this final build. Release is