+1
-Lukas
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
This is mainly a bug fix release.
We solved around 10 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14442&styleName=Html&projectId=11139
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.js
David Blevins wrote:
I've hacked on some plugins before, but the surefire one seems a little more
complicated than the typical plugin. Anyone with some surefire expertise
interested in working on this?
This is filed as SUREFIRE-179. It has an old patch, and no integration
test. The patch
Currently, it's a bit of a trick trying to get a javaagent in use with
your test cases. Here's the boiler plate pom text:
http://cwiki.apache.org/OPENEJBx30/javaagent-with-maven-surefire.html
It'd be really great if we could just do it like this:
org.apache.maven.plugins
Do your archetypes refer to repositories that you defined?
On 19-Aug-08, at 8:36 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Hiya, I'm getting lots of user reports of problems using the GMaven
archetypes... could be my fault for not really understanding how the
new stuff works fully. But seems like folks that
Hiya, I'm getting lots of user reports of problems using the GMaven
archetypes... could be my fault for not really understanding how the
new stuff works fully. But seems like folks that don't already have
the artifacts in their local repo (most users) can't use them. I
_thought_ that this
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 5:07 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barrie Treloar wrote:
>
>> mvn 2.0.9 running the latest head of maven-eclipse-plugin.
>>
>> I don't know which one it is up to since running them takes a long
>> time, but my Windows machine (2Gb memory) is crashing mor
The reporting section is only used during the execution of the site
lifecycle. The build/plugins is used during the normal lifecycle and goal
invocation. However, the configuration specified in build/plugins is also
inherited by the site lifecycle. There are a few Jira issues about this, but
in sho
+1
--
Olivier
2008/8/14 Vincent Siveton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> This is mainly a bug fix release.
>
> We solved around 10 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=14442&styleName=Html&projectId=11139
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
> http://jir
Hi,
This release is to prepare for the release of Maven Reactor Plugin.
We solved 1 issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&styleName=Html&version=14495
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=tru
Barrie Treloar wrote:
mvn 2.0.9 running the latest head of maven-eclipse-plugin.
I don't know which one it is up to since running them takes a long
time, but my Windows machine (2Gb memory) is crashing more than once.
Strange, running Windows by myself but a "mvn clean verify -P run-its"
fini
>+1
>I wouldn't try folding it into 3.x until the project builder
>refactoring is done.
We were talking about the new 2.1, not 3.0 right away.
--Brian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
On 19-Aug-08, at 12:07 AM, Milos Kleint wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
At the suggestion of others I've renamed the "makeMyChanges" goal to
"makeScmChanges". This clarifies the purpose of the goal a bit more.
What I'd like to do now, if folks
When I'm running my test, it's not from a clean directory. Everything is
already built. Thus, for the most part, the build doesn't really do
anything. You basically end up configuring a bunch of plugins that see that
they don't have to do anything. Thus, it's perfect for timing how much t
Jamie Whitehouse wrote:
Would it make more sense for the make.folders parameter to be named
make.modules to keep it consistent with the same concept in multi-module
builds?
I called it "folders" because you have the choice of specifying folder
names or artifact names with make.artifacts.
Ch
Nick Stolwijk wrote:
Shouldn't those examples include one or multiple goals and/or phases? Or
will it always execute install?
Yes, check out the examples here:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-reactor-plugin/examples.html
One example:
mvn reactor:make -Dmake.folders=barBusinessLogic -Dm
I'm trying to run the CXF build on Hudson right now with a RC10
snapshot, so hopefully I can find out why your times are so far off in
CXF...
I adjusted a few things last night to try to streamline the
concretization for aggregators and users of reactor projects. When I was
done, the full bui
Tobias Gierke wrote:
First of all, thanks for your work on this plugin...it really eases the pain
;) As far as i know, no other plugin uses camel-case goal names. Wouldn't it
be more consistent to name them "make-my-changes" and "make-scm-changes" ?
Yup, I've already changed it:
http://maven
Shouldn't those examples include one or multiple goals and/or phases? Or
will it always execute install?
With regards,
Nick Stolwijk
~Java Developer~
Iprofs BV.
Claus Sluterweg 125
2012 WS Haarlem
www.iprofs.nl
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the
>Yes, the 2.1 (or 3.0?) that will get these changes in the core is not
>around the corner yet, so I think having the fuctionality now is
>beneficial for maven users in general.
2.1 can come out as soon as we want it to, it's only blocked by 2.0.10
so we can cut the branch.
---
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 20:37 -0700, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> I've checked in a new plugin to the sandbox called the "Maven Reactor
> Plugin". You can use it to build a subset of interdependent projects in a
> reactor. It should be useful in large reactor builds that include
> irrelevant stuff you
I'm now on Leopard, but the last time I release the eclipse plugin I was on
windows.
We fixed an issue one week ago, it was an incompatibility between the
invoker and the Help mojo generated by the plugin plugin.
Do you have to wait a long time after integration tests and before the BUILD
SUCCESS
The "this-is-easier-to-read vs thisIsEasierToRead argument" would apply to all
parameters, not only goals.
But the minus '-' sign inside a parameter is equally hard to distinguish from
the - which prefixes a parameter in unixoid systems, so I personally would
prefer mixedCase notation.
$> mvn
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Dan Fabulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the suggestion of others I've renamed the "makeMyChanges" goal to
> "makeScmChanges". This clarifies the purpose of the goal a bit more.
>
> What I'd like to do now, if folks are interested, is pursue this problem
> alon
23 matches
Mail list logo
