Hi guys,
validating (mvn validate) our ~400 projects with M3 I had to recognize,
that it is a lot slower compared to M2.2. Now it takes 99 secs compared to
39 secs with M2.2. Basically this is not a really important, but the reason
why raises some additionally questions.
We have some plugins
Henrique Prange wrote:
When building from the parent module using Maven 3, the following
classpath entry has been produced:
[...]/Wonder/Frameworks/Core/JavaWOExtensions/target/JavaWOExtensions-5.0.0-SNAPSHOT.woframework
And the produced classpath entry for the same build using Maven 2.2.1:
ping :)
I added a usage note on every archetype site to quickly test creating a
project from an archetype, if it can help...
Hervé
Le mardi 27 avril 2010, Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
Hi,
I want to release Maven Archetypes parent pom - maven-archetype-bundles
version 4- and some Maven
Hi,
considering the recent fixes to checksums for stuff in central, I was
wondering what's the overall state of (existing) checksums on central
these days?
Assuming checksums are correct where present, this should put us in a
good position to introduce a new checksum policy fail-if-present
I bet there are still lots of checksum issues with maven central, I
would suggest to strongly encourage ppl to file issues with MEV and
actively fix them
-D
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Benjamin Bentmann
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote:
Hi,
considering the recent fixes to checksums for
Hi,
We solved 7 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11138version=15050
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
I will be out of the office starting 30.04.2010 and will not return until
04.05.2010.
I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message upon return.
For urgent issues please contact my colleagues:
Sergey Khomyakov / Administration - serge...@tumlare.com
Irina Pashina / Administration
It's good to ALWAYS know just where Julia is...or, rather, isn't.
On 4/30/10 3:11 PM, Julia Antonova wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 30.04.2010 and will not return until
04.05.2010.
I have no acces to my mailbox, I will reply to your message upon return.
For urgent issues please
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, John Casey
Hi Benjamin,
It did the trick. The solution worked for both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3,
as you said.
Just out of curiosity, will the definition of a lifecycle extension
change after Maven 3 integration with Guice is complete?
Thank you very much for your help.
Cheers,
Henrique
On 30/04/10
Julia, where are you visiting this time?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Tim O'Brien tobr...@discursive.com wrote:
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
Henrique Prange wrote:
It did the trick. The solution worked for both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3,
as you said.
Glad to hear.
Just out of curiosity, will the definition of a lifecycle extension
change after Maven 3 integration with Guice is complete?
Not sure what kind of change you exactly
nice!
On 4/30/10 3:33 PM, Tim O'Brien wrote:
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
On Fri,
2010/4/30 Tim O'Brien tobr...@discursive.com:
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
Oh
Maybe someone should let her colleagues in on the fun that can be had
from OoO autoreplies ;-)
I wonder if the company realises how much internal information is
being allowed to leak out in OoO autoreplies...
On 30/04/2010, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
nice!
On 4/30/10 3:33 PM,
man, its been a year already? :)
sheesh!
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconn...@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 15:20, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe someone should let her colleagues in on the fun that can be had
from OoO autoreplies ;-)
I wonder if the company realises how much
Tim O'Brien wrote:
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might be confused:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/FAQs-1#FAQs-1-IsJuliaAntonova%2FTumlareoutoftheoffice%3F
looks like there is a
Looks like one of Wikipedia's content managers deleted the page.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:16 PM, lukewpatterson
lukewpatter...@gmail.com wrote:
Tim O'Brien wrote:
Ok, I'm glad we were all prepared for this. I've made sure to update
the Maven FAQ to include this info for others that might
On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:59 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Henrique Prange wrote:
It did the trick. The solution worked for both Maven 2.2.1 and Maven 3,
as you said.
Glad to hear.
Why don't we just proactively ignore the packaging in artifact handlers?
Just out of curiosity, will the
19 matches
Mail list logo
