Re: svn commit: r940613 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-reporting-api/pom.xml

2010-05-05 Thread Lukas Theussl
why? -Lukas hbout...@apache.org wrote: Author: hboutemy Date: Mon May 3 20:47:38 2010 New Revision: 940613 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=940613view=rev Log: downgrade doxia-sink-api to 1.0 Modified: maven/shared/trunk/maven-reporting-api/pom.xml Modified:

Re: svn commit: r940318 - in /maven/plugins/branches/maven-site-plugin-3.x/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/ main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/site/webapp/ test/java/org/apache/maven/plug

2010-05-05 Thread Lukas Theussl
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: Le mardi 04 mai 2010, Dennis Lundberg a écrit : Hi, This is all great stuff, but we currently have two codebases to manage: trunk and this branch. It would be good if refactorings like these could wait until we have only one codebase to manage. I guess that you are not

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Plugin Tools 2.6 and Maven Plugins Parent POM 18

2010-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Vincent Siveton, John Casey, Jason van Zyl, Hervé Boutemy, Arnaud Héritier, Lukas Theussl +1 (non-binding): Kristian Rosenvold, Stephen Connolly I will promote the artifacts to the central repository and

Re: is this expected behaviour?

2010-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Brett Porter wrote: It used to check the env var was correct before starting - I'm not sure why it didn't in this case. In case you refer to MNG-4352, that was applied after 2.2.1 was released. Benjamin - To unsubscribe,

Re: is this expected behaviour?

2010-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
James C. McPherson wrote: I think it's reasonable to remove the delete dir=${maven.home}/ from the extract-assembly target. Thoughts? No, this task should stay in place as it ensures the installation directory actually contains the just built distribution and not some remains from a

Re: is this expected behaviour?

2010-05-05 Thread James C. McPherson
On 5/05/10 10:00 PM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: James C. McPherson wrote: I think it's reasonable to remove the delete dir=${maven.home}/ from the extract-assembly target. Thoughts? No, this task should stay in place as it ensures the installation directory actually contains the just built

Re: svn commit: r941019 - /maven/mercury/trunk/src/site/xdoc/index.xml

2010-05-05 Thread Jason van Zyl
You can just erase this repository, we're not ever going to use it. On May 4, 2010, at 10:04 PM, ol...@apache.org wrote: Author: olamy Date: Tue May 4 20:04:55 2010 New Revision: 941019 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=941019view=rev Log: add a note on the state of mercury in maven

[ANN] Maven Plugin Tools 2.6 Released

2010-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Plugin Tools, version 2.6. This plugin assists authors of Maven plugins in the creation of a plugin descriptor and documentation by scanning the plugin sources for mojo annotations. See the plugin's site for more details:

Re: Mojo not being contextualized

2010-05-05 Thread Kurt Zettel
I figured it out. Turns out I had two different versions of plexus-container-default as Maven dependencies. This caused the instanceof check in the ContextualizePhase to return false even though my Mojo implemented Contextualizable. I corrected my pom and it is working as expected now. Thank

Re: Mojo not being contextualized

2010-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Kurt Zettel wrote: I figured it out. Turns out I had two different versions of plexus-container-default as Maven dependencies. This sounds strange. For one, Maven's dependency resolution ensures only a single version per groupId:artifactId:type[:classifier] is present in the dependency

Re: Mojo not being contextualized

2010-05-05 Thread Kurt Zettel
The jars were in two different groups. We are using: plexus:plexus-log4j-logging:1.0 which imports an old version of the plexus-container which is in the group plexus versus org.codehaus.plexus. -- Kurt On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Kurt

Re: Mojo not being contextualized

2010-05-05 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Kurt Zettel wrote: The jars were in two different groups. [...] plexus versus org.codehaus.plexus. Ah, now I got it, thanks. That's unintended and scheduled for fixing in the next release [0]. Benjamin [0] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-4666

Re: svn commit: r941019 - /maven/mercury/trunk/src/site/xdoc/index.xml

2010-05-05 Thread Olivier Lamy
moved to retired path. 2010/5/5 Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com: You can just erase this repository, we're not ever going to use it. On May 4, 2010, at 10:04 PM, ol...@apache.org wrote: Author: olamy Date: Tue May  4 20:04:55 2010 New Revision: 941019 URL:

Re: [ANN] Maven Plugin Tools 2.6 Released

2010-05-05 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi there, I have take a short look on the site and found that the JIRA Report page in simply empty ? http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-plugin-plugin/ Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise -- SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893 Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz

Re: svn commit: r940613 - /maven/shared/trunk/maven-reporting-api/pom.xml

2010-05-05 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
because of r941505 if maven-reporting-impl 2.0.4.x can use maven-reporting-api 3.0 too Regards, Hervé Le mercredi 05 mai 2010, Lukas Theussl a écrit : why? -Lukas hbout...@apache.org wrote: Author: hboutemy Date: Mon May 3 20:47:38 2010 New Revision: 940613 URL: