Re: Maven 3.1.0 fails to resolve artifacts produced by reactor build

2013-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
I agree that this is a regression. I have asked Jason to take a look before he cuts the next release On 16 August 2013 14:47, Severin Gehwolf wrote: > Hi, > > We are currently using Maven 3.0.5 to build our project called > Thermostat[1]. Our build produces zip files at some stage of the > reac

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 16 August 2013 14:27, sebb wrote: > On 16 August 2013 13:44, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > r1514680 > > > > Does that, coupled with the knowledge that our source release bundles are > > *supposed to* include the tag details that they were built from resolve > > your issue? > > Sorry, but no.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread sebb
On 16 August 2013 13:44, Stephen Connolly wrote: > r1514680 > > Does that, coupled with the knowledge that our source release bundles are > *supposed to* include the tag details that they were built from resolve > your issue? Sorry, but no. As I see it, release votes should be independent of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
r1514680 Does that, coupled with the knowledge that our source release bundles are *supposed to* include the tag details that they were built from resolve your issue? (Obviously there is more tooling we can add... for instance I suspect that for GIT we are not including the git hash that release:

maven-surefire pull request: Parallel Computer

2013-08-16 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/26 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread sebb
On 16 August 2013 13:08, Fred Cooke wrote: > They're deployed as a set, so what I want is the SHA1 or even MD5 of any > one of the set of uploaded files, such that I can confirm that the set is > the set that I am supposed to be looking at. I don't see importance in > which, but I've not thought a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Fred Cooke
They're deployed as a set, so what I want is the SHA1 or even MD5 of any one of the set of uploaded files, such that I can confirm that the set is the set that I am supposed to be looking at. I don't see importance in which, but I've not thought about it much. I think *all* would be huge overkill.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
That sounds like you are looking for the SHA1 sum of the source bundle to be included in the vote email. Which would seem perfectly reasonable to me. On 16 August 2013 12:31, Fred Cooke wrote: > Dennis, of course source bundles will contain URLs and hashes and revisions > and so forth, and th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Fred Cooke
Dennis, of course source bundles will contain URLs and hashes and revisions and so forth, and the chance of those being mismatched is approximately zero. That's not the point. The point (for me, at least) is what did you INTEND to release, and does THAT match what is actually found in the bundle (

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 16 August 2013 09:32, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:52 AM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 15 August 2013 20:57,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Fred Cooke wrote: > Dennis, I've been using (and mostly loving) the release plugin/process for > the better part of a decade and certainly claim to understand it well. I > don't see how my knowledge of that (or Sebb's perceived lack of knowledge > of that) is in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread sebb
On 16 August 2013 09:32, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:52 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Fred Cooke
Dennis, I've been using (and mostly loving) the release plugin/process for the better part of a decade and certainly claim to understand it well. I don't see how my knowledge of that (or Sebb's perceived lack of knowledge of that) is in any way relevant. The release plugin means it's harder to do s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 9:52 AM, sebb wrote: > On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > >> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 15 August 2013 14:16,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread sebb
On 16 August 2013 08:10, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27 PM, sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> > What Sebb is doing is perfectly

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.16

2013-08-16 Thread Andreas Gudian
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Kristian Rosenvold, Olivier Lamy, Stephen Connolly +1 (non binding): Andreas Gudian I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. @PMC: could one of you please put the source bundles to the dist area and file the release for t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
I don't think Sebb has been under attack. Certainly I know I have tried my best to craft my replies such that it is the ideas and not the person. The one time I used "troll" and "Sebb" in the same sentence it was when I pointed out that if he continued to not address the PMCs responses and instead

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.16

2013-08-16 Thread Andreas Gudian
And here's my +1. 2013/8/16 Stephen Connolly > +1 > > On Friday, 16 August 2013, Andreas Gudian wrote: > > > One more PMC vote would be great to get this over with... ;-) > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, 15. August 2013 schrieb Olivier Lamy : > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On 12 August 2013 03:51, Andreas

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Fred Cooke wrote: > Chances of understanding me: > >- Close friend: 50% >- Other friend: 25% >- Kiwi: 15% >- Ozzy: 10% (that's you) >- POHM: 8% >- Yank: 5% >- Spaniard: 1% > > So don't feel too bad, you had a 90% chance of failure stack

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.16

2013-08-16 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 On Friday, 16 August 2013, Andreas Gudian wrote: > One more PMC vote would be great to get this over with... ;-) > > > Am Donnerstag, 15. August 2013 schrieb Olivier Lamy : > > > +1 > > > > On 12 August 2013 03:51, Andreas Gudian > > > > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We solved 13 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Model Converter version 2.3

2013-08-16 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:20 AM, sebb wrote: > On 15 August 2013 20:57, Dennis Lundberg wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:27 PM, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 15 August 2013 14:16, Jason van Zyl wrote: > >> > What Sebb is doing is perfectly reasonable. > >> > > > > I agree. Checking that the sour