I'll poke around.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> ARCHETYPE-431 fixed.
> However, when building I see a bunch of Maven "Build Failure" in the output
> from tests. Don't know if that's expected, but it looks weird. The tests
> pass though, but that could be wrong. Didn't hav
ARCHETYPE-431 fixed.
However, when building I see a bunch of Maven "Build Failure" in the output
from tests. Don't know if that's expected, but it looks weird. The tests
pass though, but that could be wrong. Didn't have time to look into that.
Also, there are some warnings in the build that could b
Hi,
Checked SHA Sum Ok...
unfortunately maven-shared-resources-2 will fail with RAT report based
on the DEPENDENCIES file which is not part of the configuration.
Maven Checkstyle Plugin (sha sum Ok). Checked with Maven 2.2.1, 3.0.5,
3.1.1, 3.2.5 without any issue.
For Maven Checkstyle Plug
We need one more binding vote.
Anyone?
--
Dennis Lundberg
Den 1 feb 2015 17:00 skrev "Dennis Lundberg" :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 14+1 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&styleName=Html&version=20631
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectI
I'll have a look.
/Anders (mobile)
Den 4 feb 2015 14:03 skrev "Benson Margulies" :
> Gents, are you willing to do it and I'll just be RM?
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Arnaud Héritier
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Anders Hammar
> wrote:
> >
> >> > Ouch that's
Gents, are you willing to do it and I'll just be RM?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
>
>> > Ouch that's an old one :-)
>> >
>> > Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
>> > motiva
+1
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > Ouch that's an old one :-)
> >
> > Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
> > motivation/time to close 431
>
>
> Yes, I hardly even remember this one. The code seems to be fixed except the
> unit test. I'd
> Ouch that's an old one :-)
>
> Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
> motivation/time to close 431
Yes, I hardly even remember this one. The code seems to be fixed except the
unit test. I'd say we should go for the easiest way so that we could close
this ticket.
Ouch that's an old one :-)
Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the
motivation/time to close 431
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> I didn't work on this one for a long time
>
> Anders and Arnaud seem to have problems to decide how to fix and clos
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 1 février 2015 17:00:21 Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 14+1 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11127&styleName=H
> tml&version=20631
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11761&styleName=
> Htm
After a few hiccups, all ITs for Maven3 now execute well on the
jaxb2-maven-plugin.
However, one of the ITs is run by Maven2 on JDK 1.6, and the integration
tests there expose the exception shown in the snippet below.
I would suspect that the error is created by parameters like the two below:
@Pa
11 matches
Mail list logo
