[GitHub] maven pull request: MNG-3092: Adds version range result filter beh...

Github user michael-o commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-149485116 @jvanzyl Can a I merge this PR into master? Are you OK with that? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

[GitHub] maven pull request: MNG-3092: Adds version range result filter beh...

Github user michael-o commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/70#issuecomment-149484847 @barthel Thanks for the update. If you rebase against current master you don't need that property at all. I have added Commons Lang to dependency management already.

Re: Maven 3.3.6 release?

So I’d like the release out before my talk on the 29th at JavaOne. I only have one issue I really want to get in but if others have things please get them integrated in the next couple days. > On Oct 13, 2015, at 3:38 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > Consider me prodded. > >> On

Re: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

OK thanks On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > csportal is not available for me, but these are two different things of > signing. The gpg creates extra signature file, but webstart as typical > webstart jar I know needs DSA or RSA signature inside jar

Re: Cannot pass any Maven Help Plugin IT

Am 2015-10-18 um 19:36 schrieb Michael Osipov: Hi folks, I am about to fix some bugs in the plugin but all ITs fail with the very same message: [INFO] Error stacktraces are turned on. [DEBUG] Reading global settings from E:\Programme\apache-maven-3.3.3\bin\..\conf\settings.xml [DEBUG] Reading

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

+1: from me No blocker from my side. Actually Java 5 is already archaic. I guess many users love Java 6+ nowadays. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise-3 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5849846...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi Tibor, > > On 10/20/15 11:12 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

@Karl Because of maven-parent:27 this plugin is built with J2SE 6.0 = 50 (0x32 hex) The previous version 2.4.1 was @ Java 5. What is intended with this release? On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

Hi Tibor, On 10/20/15 11:12 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: @Karl Because of maven-parent:27 this plugin is built with J2SE 6.0 = 50 (0x32 hex) The previous version 2.4.1 was @ Java 5. Unfortunately you are correct...(really good catch)... What is intended with this release? It was not intended,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

-1: for me. (non binding) In respect of http://semver.org/ I suggest the version 2.5.0. The Java version change is a minimum minor change. -- barthel > On 20 Oct 2015, at 23:47, Tibor Digana wrote: > > +1: from me > > No blocker from my side. Actually Java 5 is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

Hi, there are two things.. mavenVersion 3.0 is since Maven Shade Plugin 2.0 (http://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-shade-plugin-2.0/plugin-info.html)... Maven Shade Plugin is one of the exception which is already on Maven 3.X only...Maven 2 version is 1.7.1 So 3.0.0 version would

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

No, no, just a moment. The plugin Version could be 3.0 instead of 2.4.2, right? So we have everything ready for such upgrade which is biggest activity in other plugins this month, this means we have here: 3.0 and maven-plugins org.apache.maven.plugins 28

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

@Karl Let's suppose you renamed 2.4.2 to 2.5.0. What would be difference in future 3.0.0 in this plugin? Only the plugin Version itself? On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > there are two things.. > > mavenVersion 3.0 is since Maven Shade

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 2.4.2

Hi Tibort, On 10/21/15 12:53 AM, Tibor Digana wrote: @Karl Let's suppose you renamed 2.4.2 to 2.5.0. What would be difference in future 3.0.0 in this plugin? Only the plugin Version itself? Not only..First changing the naming of the properties..location of the dependency-reduced-pom should

Doxia SonarQube analysis failures

Hi, I hope I'm directing this to the right list. SonarQube analysis on Nemo has been failing for Doxia Aggregator since 26 Sept. with this: [INFO] *--- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.3.1:enforce (enforce-bytecode-version) @ doxia-doc-renderer ---