Re: [SUREFIRE] Surefire provider for JUnit 5?

2016-08-28 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Tibor, Tibor Digana schrieb am Sa., 27. Aug. 2016 um 22:48 Uhr: > The JUnit5 team create junit5-provider which might be nice to have a > look inside. I don't know if this provider has all features Surefire > provided through surefire-junit47-provider, I know for certain that > junit5-provi

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 08/24/16 um 09:22 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > I think we probably need to rethink version ranges. What I'd like is to let > the consumer Pom treat version ranges more as guidance rather than hard > requirements. It's a pain if you depend transitiveky on Foo:[1.0] but need > Foo:[1.0.1,1.1) for t

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Paul Benedict
Last week, I communicated my thoughts on why POM model 4.1.0 should not be introduced in the 3.x series. I said that I believed that forcing two separate lines of development would best be beneficial to the overall code base (which is big!!!). The benefit, so I think, is that 3.x would focus on gra

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Christian Schulte
Am 08/24/16 um 08:15 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: > Le mercredi 24 août 2016 00:45:28 Christian Schulte a écrit : >> Am 08/24/16 um 00:40 schrieb Christian Schulte: >>> Am 08/23/16 um 22:33 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: yes, people providing libraries have this big choice to do: when to upgrade m

Re: [DISCUSSION] finishing Aether import: help find a new name

2016-08-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
feedback consolidated in http://svn.apache.org/r1758149 Here is the plan now: http://maven.apache.org/aether-archives/aether.html Any more changes before I implement it? Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 26 août 2016 20:45:53 Igor Fedorenko a écrit : > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 12:51 AM, Michael Osip

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Robert Scholte
We should probably add repository info too. Right now dependencies are searched in every repository if it is not found. Not very efficient if you now where it should look. I still like this related article:"http://blog.sonatype.com/2012/02/public-service-announcement-your-build-is-leaking-and-

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
yes, we'll need to find clear terms for each concept: I now understand what you meant by consumer pom, which is not what I meant :) there are 2 ideas: - publishing classical Maven pom without build information (pom generated by flatten plugin or alike), to be able to add new build features in

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Le dimanche 28 août 2016 12:57:52 Robert Scholte a écrit : > Hi Tibor, > > There's no need to hurry to for Maven-4.0.0 just because of the > modelVersion. Maven2 was already using it, we may assume that users > already know about this. > I'd really prefer to stay on 3.x and go to 5.x once we'v

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Tibor, There's no need to hurry to for Maven-4.0.0 just because of the modelVersion. Maven2 was already using it, we may assume that users already know about this. I'd really prefer to stay on 3.x and go to 5.x once we've extended the model to version 5.0.0. (I don't mind skipping 4.x if

[ANN] Apache Maven WAR Plugin Version 3.0.0 Released

2016-08-28 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven WAR Plugin, version 3.0.0. The WAR Plugin is responsible for collecting all artifact dependencies, classes and resources of the web application and packaging them into a web application archive. http://maven.apache.org/

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Tibor Digana
@Jason @all Can you tell me why we want to release Maven 3.4.0 and not Maven 4.0.0? I guess Maven 4.0.x may finalize Model Version 4.0.0 era. Do you have other plans with Maven 4.x? Back to modelVersion and consumer POM. The consumer pom is a subset of normal POM. Keep using consumer POM with curr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.0.0 (Take 2)

2016-08-28 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, here is my +1. Kind regards On 24/08/16 21:11, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 33 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318121&version=12331760 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=projec

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.0.0 (Take 2)

2016-08-28 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 : Tibor Digana, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier Lamy, Karl Heinz Marbaise PMC quorum: reached I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise -

Re: POM Model version 4.1.0 in 3.4.0-SNAPSHOTs

2016-08-28 Thread Tibor Digana
Hi Robert, as I am reading your comments, I see the situation is not be so tragic :) What about to let m-deploy-p and m-release-p to decide on modelVersion of consumer project as the minimum version. If for instance a new scope value is available in of your project POM, then the plugin would decid

Re: Help to submit fix in maven-changes-plugin

2016-08-28 Thread Tibor Digana
Mikael, your patch should appear in https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pulls Many people do this. Please read tutorial on GitHub to push a new pull request. On 8/28/16, Mikael Petterson [via Maven] wrote: > > > Hi, > > We are trying to use 2.12 of this plugin. > > I notice that the filter th