I guess no one is familiar with Plexus or Modello. If Maven developers
are not familiar with what technologies Maven is built atop. Not sure
who else would have a clue about Plexus or Modello.
I can look to building Maven via other means. But does not reflect to
well on Maven IMHO. Plexus and
Hi,
We solved 24 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317821=12331186
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MPIR/issues
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1440/
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the
Apache Maven ACR Plugin Version 3.1.0.
This plugin generates J2EE Application Client file.
https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-acr-plugin/
Important Note:
* Maven 3.X only
* JDK 7 minimum requirement
You should specify
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Hervé Boutemy, Robert Scholte, Karl Heinz Marbaise
PMC quorum: reached.
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
-
To
yes, while at it, the warning on important change will be even more clear
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 23 juin 2018, 13:23:43 CEST Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> Hi Hervé,
>
> On 23/06/18 13:02, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > no misunderstanding: I fully agree with your analysis
> > I'm fully +1
> >
>
For Java the proposal to include the year in the version has been dropped,
it is only there in the description.
I don't see any benefit for it for Maven. Our release ratio is quite low,
so adding a year might suggest that a specific release it quite old, even
though it is the most recent
hi,
what do you think about option to change versioning schema to something
like java will follow? ie change to YY.qq.build? with 19 now will be hard
but if we release now 19.1 and in next year start with normal cumulative
montly/quarter releases for asf/maven pom?
Sylwester
W dniu sob.,
Hi Hervé,
On 23/06/18 13:02, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
no misunderstanding: I fully agree with your analysis
I'm fully +1
and since Michael will be releasing MPIR soon, with some fixes for JDK 9/10
support, let's wait for it before releasing Apache parent 20
go!
Ah very good ...
So we wait for
Happy that you like it and prefer ignore the few glitches:
- killed Jenkins server because of the automated git commits :)
- commit emails that should be avoided to commits@maven.a.o
but all in all, yes, it worked quite well git the impact of the change
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 19 juin 2018,
no misunderstanding: I fully agree with your analysis
I'm fully +1
and since Michael will be releasing MPIR soon, with some fixes for JDK 9/10
support, let's wait for it before releasing Apache parent 20
go!
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 23 juin 2018, 12:48:37 CEST Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
>
Hi Hervé,
On 23/06/18 12:12, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
ok; didn't read Karl Heinz email: perfectly explained in MPOM-186, both what's
the expected benefit (JDK 9/10 support) and requirement updates (minimum JRE
7)
I don't see any issue with requiring JRE 7 to run Maven: in my last poll, the
vast
Hi,
I have created MPOM-186 for ASF ...
So you think it would be a good idea to integrate that into ASF parent...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 23/06/18 12:10, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
Hi Hervé,
On 23/06/18 12:06, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I see MPOM-188 was created against maven-parent
ok; didn't read Karl Heinz email: perfectly explained in MPOM-186, both what's
the expected benefit (JDK 9/10 support) and requirement updates (minimum JRE
7)
I don't see any issue with requiring JRE 7 to run Maven: in my last poll, the
vast majority of people upgraded to Maven 3.5 for color
+1
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 20:14:09 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 19 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317020=12334755
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Hi Hervé,
On 23/06/18 12:06, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
I see MPOM-188 was created against maven-parent for that and fixed
for the moment, priority goes to Apache parent POM
last call for Apache parent POM updates: there are many plugin updates
available, like compiler 3.7.0, Surefire 2.22
It
Am 2018-06-23 um 12:06 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
I see MPOM-188 was created against maven-parent for that and fixed
for the moment, priority goes to Apache parent POM
last call for Apache parent POM updates: there are many plugin updates
available, like compiler 3.7.0, Surefire 2.22
I'd like to
I see MPOM-188 was created against maven-parent for that and fixed
for the moment, priority goes to Apache parent POM
last call for Apache parent POM updates: there are many plugin updates
available, like compiler 3.7.0, Surefire 2.22
Is there a reason not to upgrade? like minium java version?
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 19 juin 2018, 20:14:09 CEST Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 19 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317020
> rsion=12334755
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
