Le mardi 8 octobre 2019, 23:42:55 CEST Mark Derricutt a écrit :
> On 6 Oct 2019, at 9:14, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > if anybody cares about the exact value: but
> > who really looks at the timestamp of entries in release zips/jars/tar.gz
> > honestly?
>
> I've actually done so in the past trying to
Given the recent flatten maintenance thread seems to of gotten some traction, I
thought I'd mention this plugin, which is causing issues for migration to Java
11. There have been pull requests resolving the issues for over a year, but
nothing has been merged, in spite of numerous requests in
+1
Enrico
Il gio 10 ott 2019, 06:40 Romain Manni-Bucau ha
scritto:
> Anything user facing preventing to let it be a final?
>
> Anyway +1 to let fixes get out.
>
> Le jeu. 10 oct. 2019 à 02:53, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
>
> > Hi,
> > It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed.
Anything user facing preventing to let it be a final?
Anyway +1 to let fixes get out.
Le jeu. 10 oct. 2019 à 02:53, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Hi,
> It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed.
> Maybe time for a new release?
> Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5?
>
> cheers
Hi,
It's now almost 10 months since last and around 30 issues fixed.
Maybe time for a new release?
Moving issues still open to 3.0.0-M5?
cheers
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
I have to fully agree on Michael Osipov. This discussion is
contraproductive from the time perspective.
He explained the situation in Maven very clearly that we have over 1800
bugs and here we are talking about javac compiler version which does not
fix these bugs.
We know that our community is
Totally disagree on the point. Writing java7 code after 8 makes you feel
suffering - because instead of expressive stream based operations and lambdas
you write pointless iterators and copy collections.
It is purely subjective opinion that lambdas make code less readable - at least
there is an
