Re: Maven Enforcer Release-3.0.0-M3

Elliote, It is stable. We do not want to break users, but we split the global picture for the version Y.0.0 into multiple complete stages (not incomplete!), but the Y.0.0 becomes a bunch of these Mx. It does not mean that a bugfix is incomplete or appears across multiple versions. I think you have

Re: 3.6.3 release?

Hi Mickael, Working on last issues: should be able to launch a release soon. Regards, Hervé Le mardi 12 novembre 2019, 15:57:56 CET Mickael Istria a écrit : > Hi all, > > What's the status here? Any ETA for 3.6.3 release? > > Cheers ---

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

Stephen Connolly wrote: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Dynamic+phases > > Thoughts? Very nice. I like this a lot. In particular, it still feels like Maven with its well-known phases rather than like the "every project rolls their own" approach of Ant or Gradle. And to answer

Re: 3.6.3 release?

Hi all, What's the status here? Any ETA for 3.6.3 release? Cheers

Re: Did you see dependabot?

Now there's a LEGAL ticket for that: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-491 With a comment from Mark Thomas that this is no different than a committer running a local tool, reviewing the commit and pushing it. Read his comment on the ticket for more information and advice. Martijn On

Re: Maven Enforcer Release-3.0.0-M3

I guess the reasoning goes something like this: "I am a plugin developer, and I want to release a number of changes, a sub-set of which are "breaking changes". Since all my changes are not ready at the same time and I want to avoid releasing several major versions close to each other (assuming sema

Re: Maven Enforcer Release-3.0.0-M3

Il mar 12 nov 2019, 13:01 Elliotte Rusty Harold ha scritto: > I'm a little nervous about this is being messages to and being > understood by developers. How stable is a milestone release? If it's > not stable, they shouldn't be seeing as abroad an adoption as they > are. If it is stable, then why

Re: Maven Enforcer Release-3.0.0-M3

I'm a little nervous about this is being messages to and being understood by developers. How stable is a milestone release? If it's not stable, they shouldn't be seeing as abroad an adoption as they are. If it is stable, then why not give it a full release as 3.0.0. (or whatever) and add more in 3.

Re: Maven Enforcer Release-3.0.0-M3

Hi Elliotte, I am also using milestones in Surefire, as you may have noticed, because the complete work is too big and for one release. As for instance, milestones are fantastic for the major versions like in 3.0.0 because it is the only chance when you can break some backwards compatibility in pl

Re: JDK 14 - Early Access build 22 is available

Hi Tibor, I'd recommend watching Brian's talk at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H4vmT-Va4o for the latest status update on Project Valhalla from the JVM Language Summit in August, where JEP 169 is explored. Sergey gave a talk at Oracle Code One discussing the performance aspects which is

Maven Surefire/Failsafe Release-3.0.0-M4

Hi, There are altogether 43 bugfixes in the JIRA. I would like to start a new release Vote today evening. Kind regards, Tibor17

Re: JDK 14 - Early Access build 22 is available

Hi Rory, Can you explain the progress of the work in Value Objects (JEP-169) and proposed final release for it? You are here, so I want to utilize it and hear what is normally not written on your pages. It is quite important feature for the performance and memory consumption. Would you introduce i

JDK 14 - Early Access build 22 is available

Hi Robert , *OpenJDK builds  - JDK 14 *- Early Access build 22 is available at http://jdk.java.net/14/ These early-access, open-source builds are provided under the GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception . * Release

Re: Dynamic phases proposal

On Tue 12 Nov 2019 at 07:34, Robert Scholte wrote: > This is not just MNG-5668, but also contains several non-existing issues, > that should be mentioned explicitly as they will have huge impact: > > - support before:/after: prefix for phase-binding > > - introduce priority > - reduce phases (thi