[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Doxia Sitetools version 1.11

Hi, We solved 3 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12350749 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%2012317320%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Open Staging repo:

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

+1 On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 20:58 Manfred Moser wrote: > I totally agree with finally just shipping this. We got this all donated > about two years ago now and there is still nothing shipping. > > I used to just manually do the testing and thousands of projects are > happy. I assume the new

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

I totally agree with finally just shipping this. We got this all donated about two years ago now and there is still nothing shipping. I used to just manually do the testing and thousands of projects are happy. I assume the new project is at least manually testing and works as before or

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

+1 go for it !! On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 7:37 PM Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2021-12-10 um 10:30 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > > I've refactored the build to be a single-module build. > > I agree that maven-caching is not the most descriptive, I'd be pleased > with > >*

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

Am 2021-12-10 um 10:30 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: I've refactored the build to be a single-module build. I agree that maven-caching is not the most descriptive, I'd be pleased with * maven-build-cache-extension* This sounds very promising.

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

To me there's a very important piece missing. For the maven-wrapper-plugin I wrote several ITs to proof that downloading and unpacking works with all kinds of combinations of parameters. With the maven-wrapper code moved to this project, there no coverage at all to the actual wrapper code.

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

+1 jvz > On Dec 10, 2021, at 4:30 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > I've refactored the build to be a single-module build. > I agree that maven-caching is not the most descriptive, I'd be pleased with > * maven-build-cache-extension* > > Guillaume >

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

+1 for maven-build-cache-extension as well Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn |

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

the current 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT works like 0.5.6 as donated: I confess I did not test, I just did not change anything using the general approach "people were happy before, just continue step by step improvements" :) reading the mvnw script (*nix), compiling+running the .java is executed only if

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

In order to run proper IT test by maven-invoker-plugin we should provide invoker.properties like: invoker.goals.1 = wraper:wrapper invoker.goals.2 = validate invoker.mavenExecutable.2 = ./mvnw invoker.os.family.2 = unix, mac invoker.goals.3 = validate invoker.mavenExecutable.3 = ./mvnw.cmd

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

+1 for maven-build-cache-extension On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 11:00 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I've refactored the build to be a single-module build. > I agree that maven-caching is not the most descriptive, I'd be pleased with > * maven-build-cache-extension* > > Guillaume > > Le jeu. 9 déc.

Re: reviewing Maven Wrapper before releasing

I need more time. e.g. it looks like type=source doesn't use the Java sourcefile to download the wrapper. now that the plugin and wrapper are combined in one project, the ITs are incomplete. They should call both the wrapper-goal and something like 'mvnw --version' to ensure it is working

Re: [DISCUSS] Move maven caching to an external repository

I've refactored the build to be a single-module build. I agree that maven-caching is not the most descriptive, I'd be pleased with * maven-build-cache-extension* Guillaume Le jeu. 9 déc. 2021 à 11:40, Michael Osipov a écrit : > Am 2021-12-07 um 09:47 schrieb Guillaume Nodet: > > Following