-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 17:35:10 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
From: Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] (take 2) Release Maven Surefire plugin version
+1
Vincent
2008/1/27, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again!
[Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is
almost irresistable. ;-)]
-Dan
-- Forwarded message --
Date:
+1
-Lukas
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again!
[Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is
almost irresistable. ;-)]
-Dan
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:53:28
+1
Arnaud
On Jan 28, 2008 2:08 PM, Fabrizio Giustina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1!
fabrizio
On Jan 28, 2008 2:35 AM, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again!
[Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide
+1!
fabrizio
On Jan 28, 2008 2:35 AM, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again!
[Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is
almost irresistable. ;-)]
-Dan
-- Forwarded
+1
2008/1/28, Fabrizio Giustina [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1!
fabrizio
On Jan 28, 2008 2:35 AM, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again!
[Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is
+1
-Original Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 8:35 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] (take 2) Release Maven Surefire plugin version 2.4.1
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again
+1
Dan Fabulich wrote:
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again!
[Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is
almost irresistable. ;-)]
-Dan
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:53:28 -0800
-0
This may not be a blocking bug but It is a regresion since 2.4 where
my Spring JpaDao with embedded Derby test fails . Other databases are fine.
The exception is producable with 2.5-SNAPSHOT ( build from source ),
2.4.1-SNAPSHOT( at apache snapshot repo).
surefire 2.3 and 2.3.1 are fine.
Dan Tran wrote:
-0
This may not be a blocking bug but It is a regresion since 2.4 where
my Spring JpaDao with embedded Derby test fails . Other databases are fine.
The exception is producable with 2.5-SNAPSHOT ( build from source ),
2.4.1-SNAPSHOT( at apache snapshot repo).
surefire 2.3 and
Dan, it will take sometime for me come up with a compact example this bug.
also, the issue is produceable with 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, and 2.5-SNAPSHOT.
-D
On Jan 28, 2008 6:16 PM, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Tran wrote:
-0
This may not be a blocking bug but It is a regresion
Fabrizio found a last-minute bug. I've rolled a new candidate. Let's
vote again!
[Boy, the temptation to let the rules slide on a change this small is
almost irresistable. ;-)]
-Dan
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:53:28 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)
12 matches
Mail list logo