Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

grr, seems I'm the culprit of this regression :( I saw the commit before the report on the ML... this doesn't change the question of tracking: do we cancel the 3.3.7 vote and respin 3.3.8? or publish 3.3.7 with this known issue? Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 29 octobre 2015 20:21:45 Igor Fedorenko

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

I will respin it. It only takes me a few minutes now. > On Oct 30, 2015, at 12:24 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > grr, seems I'm the culprit of this regression :( > I saw the commit before the report on the ML... > > this doesn't change the question of tracking: do we

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Yes, that commit fixed the problem and I am able to run our entire build successfully with the current master. Thank you for looking into this, Jason. Very unscientific, but I do see small-ish performance degradation compared to 3.3.3, the build too 25m50s with 3.3.3 and 26m35s with the current

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Well I cannot build with 3.3.3 because it picks the wrong parent projects from the reactor so I can only compare with a 3.3.6-SNAPSHOT that I have been running for the past 4+ months while intermitently pestering Jason to cut a release ;-) On 30 October 2015 at 14:09, Igor Fedorenko

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

This vote is cancelled. > On Oct 30, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Stephen Connolly > wrote: > > Well I cannot build with 3.3.3 because it picks the wrong parent > projects from the reactor so I can only compare with a 3.3.6-SNAPSHOT > that I have been running for the past

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

It's a smooth ride. Here's my +1 ... not legally, but morally binding ;) 2015-10-28 14:30 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl : > Hi, > > Time to release Maven 3.3.7! > > Here is a link to the issues resolved: > >

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

+1 beer On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 21:29 Andreas Gudian wrote: > It's a smooth ride. Here's my +1 ... not legally, but morally binding ;) > > 2015-10-28 14:30 GMT+01:00 Jason van Zyl : > > > Hi, > > > > Time to release Maven 3.3.7! > > > > Here is a link to

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Tested with a few projects, I see no issues with this release. Thank you, +1 non-binding. On Oct 29, 2015 17:15, "Tamás Cservenák" wrote: > +1 beer > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, 21:29 Andreas Gudian > wrote: > > > It's a smooth ride. Here's my +1 ...

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Tried out with a couple of projects that contributed to burning two of the previous release attempts plus a couple more. All good! +1 2015-10-29 23:37 GMT+02:00 jieryn : > Tested with a few projects, I see no issues with this release. Thank you, > +1 non-binding. > On Oct 29,

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

On 29 Oct 2015, at 19:13, Stephen Connolly wrote: > FYI Mark, your vote is binding as a contributor... i.e. if you voted > -1 the release manager would have to consider aborting the release, > your vote just does not provide one of the three required +1's by PMC *nod* I think I implicitly

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

-1 3.3.7 fails with string-index-out-of-range exception when parent pom has scm and I assume other elements with empty child I think the problem was introduced with recent changes in DefaultInheritanceAssembler, at least the problem goes away if I replace the class with the

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

FYI Mark, your vote is binding as a contributor... i.e. if you voted -1 the release manager would have to consider aborting the release, your vote just does not provide one of the three required +1's by PMC members required to invoke the foundation legal protections for contributors. (A release

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

I took a look and added a test. Can you see if master (f684761dee739b4ec8a7e6db5a0a6a0b809e66c9) fixes your issue? > On Oct 29, 2015, at 5:21 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote: > > -1 > > 3.3.7 fails with string-index-out-of-range exception when parent pom has > scm and I assume

[VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Hi, Time to release Maven 3.3.7! Here is a link to the issues resolved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12333074 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1228/ The distributable binaries and sources for testing can be

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

My point, if I was unclear my apologies, was that the backlog should just be where work is to be found. And if you find work, then move it into the next release version. I think that's a simple "one-stop shopping" way to look at this. It's just a suggestion I thought could help. Cheers, Paul On

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

FYI, 14 unresolved issues need to move to 3.3.x to make the JIRA list correct. PS: Instead of moving the unresolved forward to a 3.3.8 bucket, how come they aren't put in the Backlog? It would save churn. The Backlog should be cherry-picked and tickets pulled into the next release when work is

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

If I put them in the backlog I will completely forget about them. If someone else wants to shuffle the issues go for it. jvz > On Oct 28, 2015, at 7:32 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > > FYI, 14 unresolved issues need to move to 3.3.x to make the JIRA list > correct. > > PS:

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Here is my vote: * As a community member on the technical merit of making this specific release +1: I have tested this build on the projects that I know are troublesome and the regressions in 3.3.1 and 3.3.3 are resolved. * As a member of the committee established by the ASF board with

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Am 2015-10-28 um 18:28 schrieb Stephen Connolly: Thanks for contributions from non-committers go to: * Martin Schäf * Joseph Walton * Keith Turner * Anton Tanasenko * Stephen Kitt * "tssp at web dot de" (whoever you are - a small commit with clear intent of Apache License grant) * "sugartxy "

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Am 2015-10-28 um 14:30 schrieb Jason van Zyl: Hi, Time to release Maven 3.3.7! Here is a link to the issues resolved: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12333074 Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1228/ The

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

On 29 Oct 2015, at 2:30, Jason van Zyl wrote: > Time to release Maven 3.3.7! +1 non-binding. Works fine on our builds using heavy maven-tiles, and my largish IT test project all works fine. Been doing releases and builds all day with no issue. Mark -- Mark Derricutt

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Hi, just a note on this conclusion which remembers me that we should add those cotributors to the final announcment mail and put them on the release notes as well...to give them the credit they deserve instead of only mention them here on the dev list... BTW: Thanks to Stephen to summarize

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

I On Wednesday 28 October 2015, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2015-10-28 um 18:28 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > >> Thanks for contributions from non-committers go to: >> * Martin Schäf >> * Joseph Walton >> * Keith Turner >> * Anton Tanasenko >> * Stephen Kitt >> * "tssp at web

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Hi, I have cleaned up JIRA ...moved all not solved issues to Backlog for 3.X Furthermore checked with several projects...maven-jar-plugin, maven-assembly-plugin (current trunk), some of my own projects (uptodate-maven-plugin, iterator-maven-plugin, test-maven-eventspy etc.) without any

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Sure you can close the PR. Put 'Closes #nn.' in a commit message. On Oct 28, 2015 4:38 PM, "Stephen Connolly" wrote: > I > > On Wednesday 28 October 2015, Michael Osipov wrote: > > > Am 2015-10-28 um 18:28 schrieb Stephen Connolly: > > > >>

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.3.7

Thanks very much for cleaning up JIRA. jvz > On Oct 28, 2015, at 2:11 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > Hi, > > I have cleaned up JIRA ...moved all not solved issues to Backlog for 3.X > > Furthermore checked with several projects...maven-jar-plugin, >