Ok. I'll see to that she signs a cla.
/Anders (mobile)
Den 13 nov 2012 17:28 skrev "Stephen Connolly" <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>:
> On 13 November 2012 15:04, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > 2012/11/13 Anders Hammar :
> > >> Changes looks good for me.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Thanks for having a loo
On 13 November 2012 15:04, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/11/13 Anders Hammar :
> >> Changes looks good for me.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for having a look!
> > One specific thing I'm not sure about is the maven-security artifactId.
> Is
> > it good, or should we maybe use maven-crypto. maven-security coul
2012/11/13 Anders Hammar :
>> Changes looks good for me.
>>
>
> Thanks for having a look!
> One specific thing I'm not sure about is the maven-security artifactId. Is
> it good, or should we maybe use maven-crypto. maven-security could in the
> future contain more than the crypto things.
>
> Most o
Changes looks good for me.
Most of the large changes has been done Karin Karlsson (can we have cla ?)
Any special reason to use a package org.maven ?
New files doesn't have license header but " //TODO: add copyright "
Thanks
--
Olivier Lamy
Talend: http://coders.talend.com
http://twitter.com/ol
On 13 November 2012 11:28, Anders Hammar wrote:
> > Changes looks good for me.
> >
>
> Thanks for having a look!
> One specific thing I'm not sure about is the maven-security artifactId. Is
> it good, or should we maybe use maven-crypto. maven-security could in the
> future contain more than the
> Changes looks good for me.
>
Thanks for having a look!
One specific thing I'm not sure about is the maven-security artifactId. Is
it good, or should we maybe use maven-crypto. maven-security could in the
future contain more than the crypto things.
Most of the large changes has been done Karin K
resend as I have issues with my @apache.o mailbox.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Olivier Lamy
Date: 2012/11/12
Subject: MNG-5356 Make encrypt/decrypt logic pluggable
To: Maven Developers List
Changes looks good for me.
Most of the large changes has been done Karin Karlsson
I have another set of commits and tests but go ahead and make whatever changes
you want I can work with it.
On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:01 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> Well, we have Jason's commits on trunk I believe and he's said he will
> get some ITs for that.
> The thing is that switching from 3.0.
Well, we have Jason's commits on trunk I believe and he's said he will
get some ITs for that.
The thing is that switching from 3.0.5 to 3.1 is not just a POM
change, we need to reconfigure the ITs saying the should work on 3.0.5
to say they would work on 3.1 instead. I think we already have a
coupl
As long as we have a real and uncontroversial 3.1 change I'm happy
about investing in a new version number ;)
Kristian
Den 3. okt. 2012 kl. 21:58 skrev Anders Hammar :
>> That will probably require to bump core version to 3.1 :-)
>
> Right, I'd like to get this into the planned 3.1 release.
> Th
> That will probably require to bump core version to 3.1 :-)
Right, I'd like to get this into the planned 3.1 release.
Thanks for bringing this up. :-)
For the ITs, I think it would be good if we bumped the version of core
to 3.1-SNAPSHOT as we then can correctly specify what versions these
new t
2012/10/3 Anders Hammar :
> When using Maven in enterprise environments I often find in annoying
> that encrypting passwords is a hassle to set up. I would like to have
> the possibility to simplify this by, for example, re-using some
> existing solution. I've created MNG-5356 to track this.
>
> Lo
When using Maven in enterprise environments I often find in annoying
that encrypting passwords is a hassle to set up. I would like to have
the possibility to simplify this by, for example, re-using some
existing solution. I've created MNG-5356 to track this.
Looking at the code though, the current
13 matches
Mail list logo
