Re: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-20 Thread Gilles Scokart
have to provide a redirection service which isn't feasible for all repos. -Original Message- From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 7:06 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Maven's future repository support

Re: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-18 Thread Tamás Cservenák
: Sunday, March 16, 2008 7:06 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Maven's future repository support Forking the other thread. Maven still needs to work properly without a repository manager (even if it is a good practice to use one). In my opinion, that means: - proper unique identifiers

Maven's future repository support

2008-03-16 Thread Brett Porter
Forking the other thread. Maven still needs to work properly without a repository manager (even if it is a good practice to use one). In my opinion, that means: - proper unique identifiers for repositories (my preference would actually be to control this by group ID, but I see too many

Re: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-16 Thread Nigel Magnay
That sounds good to me, and I see where the identifiers have come in; I think you could do without them though, and just use the repository URI as the identifier :- For 'external' mirrors, accessed directly and not through a repo manager: Say you have repo1.maven.org/maven2, and global mirrors of

RE: Maven's future repository support

2008-03-16 Thread Brian E. Fox
List Subject: Maven's future repository support Forking the other thread. Maven still needs to work properly without a repository manager (even if it is a good practice to use one). In my opinion, that means: - proper unique identifiers for repositories (my preference would actually