Am 2024-01-09 um 09:12 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 20:49 Slawomir Jaranowski
napisał(a):
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 16:17 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
On 2024/01/05 14:03:11 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
Hi,
My summary for this discussion:
No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák,
wt., 9 sty 2024 o 10:45 Tamás Cservenák napisał(a):
> Howdy,
>
> I still think we need to modify few bits here and there:
> - we MUST compile against latest maven (3.9.6 currently)
>
Step by step - it can be a next task
> - this thread (as I see) is about "minimal prerequisite" for plugin (so
Hey all,
I'm a new user of the list so I don't know later discussions.
I would lift the minimal API version to the newest available one:
Two reasons for this:
- You / we want to cut some old tails with Maven 4. This should also be
a good time to cut old tails for maven plugins, esp. as there w
Howdy,
I still think we need to modify few bits here and there:
- we MUST compile against latest maven (3.9.6 currently)
- this thread (as I see) is about "minimal prerequisite" for plugin (so
POM/prerequisite)
- to address issues Slawek brought up, we need at least to modify this
stanza in CI:
ht
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 20:49 Slawomir Jaranowski
napisał(a):
>
>
> pt., 5 sty 2024 o 16:17 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
>
>> On 2024/01/05 14:03:11 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > My summary for this discussion:
>> >
>> > No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák, Anders Hammar, Olivier La
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 16:17 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
> On 2024/01/05 14:03:11 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > My summary for this discussion:
> >
> > No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák, Anders Hammar, Olivier Lamy,
> > Sylwester Lachiewicz, Jorge Solórzano, Gary Gregory, Hervé Bout
I would like to kindly remember that this thread is not about the JDK
version, if we need such discussion we should start a new thread.
pt., 5 sty 2024 o 18:22 Karl Heinz Marbaise
napisał(a):
> On 05.01.24 17:02, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2024/01/05 15:52:54 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> >> ..
On 05.01.24 17:02, Michael Osipov wrote:
On 2024/01/05 15:52:54 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
...
On 05.01.24 16:19, Michael Osipov wrote:
On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
+1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
minimum runtime requirement..
This r
On 2024/01/05 15:52:54 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> ...
> On 05.01.24 16:19, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> >> +1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
> >> minimum runtime requirement..
> >
> > This reminds me of https://g
...
On 05.01.24 16:19, Michael Osipov wrote:
On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
+1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
minimum runtime requirement..
This reminds me of https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/10902 and it
provides very good reaso
On 2024/01/05 14:37:44 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> +1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
> minimum runtime requirement..
This reminds me of https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/10902 and it
provides very good reasons why not to do it. Maven is a low level too
On 2024/01/05 14:03:11 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My summary for this discussion:
>
> No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák, Anders Hammar, Olivier Lamy,
> Sylwester Lachiewicz, Jorge Solórzano, Gary Gregory, Hervé Boutemy
>
> Michael Osipov - had a questions but I assume that is no
Hi,
I'm the same opinion to upgrade to the most recent Maven 3.X version..
for the plugins... +1 (but I'm ok also to use Maven 3.6.3 as minimum)..
+1 Also the point JDK11 (maybe even higher JDK17?) for Maven 4.0.0 as
minimum runtime requirement..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 31.12.23
Hi,
My summary for this discussion:
No objection for change: Tamás Cservenák, Anders Hammar, Olivier Lamy,
Sylwester Lachiewicz, Jorge Solórzano, Gary Gregory, Hervé Boutemy
Michael Osipov - had a questions but I assume that is no -1 from him
So:
I would like to not categorize cora and not cor
for the records, "Maven Plugins Compatibility Plan" strategy is stored in
https://maven.apache.org/developers/compatibility-plan.html
= the doc to refer to and update if necessary after the current discussion
Le vendredi 29 décembre 2023, 14:42:17 CET Slawomir Jaranowski a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Las
+1 to Jorge.
As I understand it, this is the "minimal version supported" (prerequisite)
we talk about here. But imo 3.x plugins should compile against lastest 3.x
Maven.
T
On Sun, Dec 31, 2023, 00:35 Jorge Solórzano wrote:
> I know that a build tool is different from a framework, but we are ag
I know that a build tool is different from a framework, but we are again
missing the point here, is not about framework vs build tools, the point is
that newer projects already require new Java versions, and if legacy
projects require using an old Java version, then those projects will still
be usi
Am 2023-12-30 um 16:43 schrieb Jorge Solórzano:
I'm a bit confused here, why would anyone update Maven plugins in a project
and NOT update Maven Core? Older versions of Maven are EOL, is expected
that Maven Core is backward-compatible on minor releases so updating Maven
Core should be straightfor
FWIW, at work, we just went from Java 8 to 17, and we are a pretty
conservative organization.
Gary
On Sat, Dec 30, 2023, 10:44 AM Jorge Solórzano wrote:
> I'm a bit confused here, why would anyone update Maven plugins in a project
> and NOT update Maven Core? Older versions of Maven are EOL, is
I'm a bit confused here, why would anyone update Maven plugins in a project
and NOT update Maven Core? Older versions of Maven are EOL, is expected
that Maven Core is backward-compatible on minor releases so updating Maven
Core should be straightforward. I might be missing something but I don't
see
Am 2023-12-30 um 11:42 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
sob., 30 gru 2023 o 10:43 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
Am 2023-12-30 um 09:24 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
pt., 29 gru 2023 o 18:40 Michael Osipov
napisał(a):
Am 2023-12-29 um 14:42 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
Hi,
Last year we mark all
+1
Sylwester
sob., 30 gru 2023 o 11:43 Slawomir Jaranowski
napisał(a):
> sob., 30 gru 2023 o 10:43 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
>
> > Am 2023-12-30 um 09:24 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> > > pt., 29 gru 2023 o 18:40 Michael Osipov
> > napisał(a):
> > >
> > >> Am 2023-12-29 um 14:42 schrieb Slaw
sob., 30 gru 2023 o 10:43 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
> Am 2023-12-30 um 09:24 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> > pt., 29 gru 2023 o 18:40 Michael Osipov
> napisał(a):
> >
> >> Am 2023-12-29 um 14:42 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and o
Am 2023-12-30 um 09:24 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
pt., 29 gru 2023 o 18:40 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
Am 2023-12-29 um 14:42 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
Hi,
Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and older as EOL [1]
But we still try to support minimal API version for Core Maven Plug
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 18:24, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
>
> pt., 29 gru 2023 o 18:40 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
>
> > Am 2023-12-29 um 14:42 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and older as EOL [1]
> > >
> > > But we still try to support
pt., 29 gru 2023 o 18:40 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
> Am 2023-12-29 um 14:42 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and older as EOL [1]
> >
> > But we still try to support minimal API version for Core Maven Plugins as
> > 3.2.5
> >
> > I would lik
Am 2023-12-29 um 14:42 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
Hi,
Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and older as EOL [1]
But we still try to support minimal API version for Core Maven Plugins as
3.2.5
I would like to propose to sich it for at least to 3.6.3
Reasonable reasons: (for me)
- fo
+1
/Anders
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:43 PM Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and older as EOL [1]
>
> But we still try to support minimal API version for Core Maven Plugins as
> 3.2.5
>
> I would like to propose to sich it for at least to 3.6.3
>
>
+1 and Happy New Year to everyone :)
T
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:42 PM Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and older as EOL [1]
>
> But we still try to support minimal API version for Core Maven Plugins as
> 3.2.5
>
> I would like to propose to sich
Hi,
Last year we mark all Maven versions 3.6.x and older as EOL [1]
But we still try to support minimal API version for Core Maven Plugins as
3.2.5
I would like to propose to sich it for at least to 3.6.3
Reasonable reasons: (for me)
- for standard CI build we use Maven 3.6.3 and newer
- man
30 matches
Mail list logo