On 29 June 2013 11:47, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sebb,
none of these files will end up in Maven Central, they are all used for
tests.
However, they do end up in the source release which is published via
the ASF mirrors.
It's vital that all released source files have the
On Sunday, 30 June 2013, sebb wrote:
On 29 June 2013 11:47, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org javascript:;
wrote:
Hi Sebb,
none of these files will end up in Maven Central, they are all used for
tests.
However, they do end up in the source release which is published via
the ASF
On 30 June 2013 21:04, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, 30 June 2013, sebb wrote:
On 29 June 2013 11:47, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org javascript:;
wrote:
Hi Sebb,
none of these files will end up in Maven Central, they are all used for
tests.
Hi Sebb,
none of these files will end up in Maven Central, they are all used for
tests.
For me that's not enough reason to cancel the vote.
thanks,
Robert
Op Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:26:03 +0200 schreef sebb seb...@gmail.com:
On 25 June 2013 21:23, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 25 juin 2013 22:23:13 Robert Scholte a écrit :
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530version=190
11
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Op Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:23:13 +0200 schreef Robert Scholte
rfscho...@apache.org:
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530version=19011
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
2013/6/26 Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org:
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530version=19011
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11530status=1
On 25 June 2013 21:23, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530version=19011
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:23:13 +0200
Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
+1,
tony.
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530version=19011
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1 on that one: going onto a major version change like 2.x could be better
here imo.
I'm totally OK with releasing things that are more correct (not working
correctly about artifact resolution here).
But since this is likely to break a lot of internal rules (for example,
it's gonna break 50% of
+1
2013/6/22 Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org:
Hi,
We solved 15 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11530version=19011
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11530status=1
-0.9 (non binding).
I just tested on a local project, codehaus mojo EnforceBytecodeVersion
fails with an NPE with m-enforcer-p 1.3 but correctly thows an
EnforcerRuleException with 1.2.
That is, as I am the one who wrote that rule, that's perfectly possible I'm
doing something stooopid in the
Hi Baptiste,
you're hitting the result of the changes due to MENFORCER-42[1]
Up until 1.2 the dependencies were resolved instead of calculated.
So if you run 'mvn validate' you can't use the results of the reactor,
since those files aren't available yet. So the build will fail or it will
use
Hi,
No problem, I'll see how I can fix that.
FWIW, I've just run the ITs of mojo's extra-enforcer-rules project with
m-enforcer-p:1.3.
This gives:
[ERROR] The following builds failed:
[ERROR] * enforce-bytecode-version-jdkVersionOption\pom.xml
[ERROR] *
Hello,
I did the tests wrongly for extra-enforcer-rules, the new version of
enforcer is backwards incompatible:
org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.AbstractStandardEnforcerRule had a
public message field in 1.2, this is now (1.3) private and uses
getMessage and setMessage methods.
This would mean
+1 (non-binding) tested with two homegrown plugins, the
extra-enforcer-rules and one small multi-module project.
Regards Mirko
--
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Robert Scholte
16 matches
Mail list logo