On 02/03/2008, at 10:40 PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
+1 for the artifact
But -0 for the documentation. Any reasons why the layout is not
standard?
It still looks complete - but should be run though docck in future,
right?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/3/1, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
--
Olivier
2008/3/2, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
The remaining issues
+1
Dan
On Saturday 01 March 2008, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540style
Name=Htmlversion=13994
The remaining issues in
+1
Le dimanche 2 mars 2008, Brett Porter a écrit :
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=
Htmlversion=13994
The remaining issues in JIRA are
+1 for the artifact
But -0 for the documentation. Any reasons why the layout is not standard?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/3/1, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
+1
Fabrice
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
+1
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
The
+1
--jason
On Mar 2, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the
2.0.9 release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540styleName=Htmlversion=13994
The remaining issues
+1
I was sure I was going to have to give a -1 because MSHADE-9 was marked
Not reproducible, but I too can't reproduce it using this version; I
think/hope that this is because we upgraded our version of asm and that
took care of it. :-)
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready
On 17-Jan-08, at 6:24 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade-
plugin. It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until they provide a
fix. (unless someone wants to jump into ASM
Brian E. Fox wrote:
It's not entirely true that versions don't matter. Alpha or Beta is
really a less important distinction and we are generally trying to move
away from more alpha/beta releases. I would argue that since Maven
requires Shade to release, that the current version should be 1.0 not
+1
--jason
On Jan 17, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Well, I'd prefer to not get into version number arguments as it
really
just doesn't matter.Hell, we have plugins (like the release
plugin,
dependency plugin, etc..) that EVERYONE uses that haven't had a real
release and
+1
dkulp wrote:
I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
This fixes a couple issues we'e run into:
** Bug
* [MSHADE-11] - Shaded jars are not unjarrable
* [MSHADE-13] -
Well, I'd prefer to not get into version number arguments as it really
just doesn't matter.Hell, we have plugins (like the release plugin,
dependency plugin, etc..) that EVERYONE uses that haven't had a real
release and others (like surefire) that never had a alpha/beta
release, but
dkulp wrote:
I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
OpenEJB, actually. And here's my +1! (non-binding)
-David
--
View this message in context:
+1 get it out and that doesn't stop us from doing another release soon.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:22 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1
Well, I'd prefer to not get
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in maven-shade-plugin.
It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until they provide a fix. (unless
someone wants to jump into ASM code. I don't have the time.)
I'm not saying
, January 17, 2008 9:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix in
maven-shade-plugin.
It's a bug in ASM and isn't fixable until
I agree 100%, release often its the only way things really get used and tested
in the wild... if people have problems they can alway roll back to the last
release in the deps...
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:30:51 Brian E. Fox wrote:
...
the people that need them. I'd rather see a release come out
Message-
From: Dan Fabulich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 9:25 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1
Responding out of order, techincal stuff first...
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The fact is MSHADE-9 is not something we can fix
+1
On 16-Jan-08, at 11:57 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
I'd like to release maven-shade-plugin 1.0-beta-1 as I kind of need it
for some of my projects. I think Geronimo may need it as well.
This fixes a couple issues we'e run into:
** Bug
* [MSHADE-11] - Shaded jars are not unjarrable
*
I approve of the idea of releasing another version of maven-shade-plugin,
but I don't think we should call it non-alpha until MSHADE-9 is fixed.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSHADE-9
If this were called 1.0-alpha-16, I'd give it a +1; as it stands, I have
to vote -1 (non-binding).
-Dan
22 matches
Mail list logo
