Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-30 Thread Brett Porter
On 30 January 2010 02:38, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: could we use milestone as names in replacement for alpha, so that we get more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? I can understand the

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2010-01-29, at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote: Hi, Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency with type xml.zip. This dependency was declared in another module of the reactor, and was a dependency of a plugin (maven-andromda-plugin). So there is no

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Which bug are your talking about? Have you filled something in Jira? S. On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hi, Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency with type xml.zip. This dependency was declared in another module of

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread nicolas de loof
could we use milestone as names in replacement for alpha, so that we get more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with alpha in version name. Would you install Windows 8 alpha on your @work computer ? ;)

Re : Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Julien HENRY
Janvier 2010, 15 h 14 min 59 s Objet : Re: Maven 3 alpha status Which bug are your talking about? Have you filled something in Jira? S. On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote: Hi, Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency with type

Re: Re : Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Stephane Nicoll
@maven.apache.org Envoyé le : Ven 29 Janvier 2010, 15 h 14 min 59 s Objet : Re: Maven 3 alpha status Which bug are your talking about? Have you filled something in Jira? S. On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote: Hi, Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote: could we use milestone as names in replacement for alpha, so that we get more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ? I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with alpha in version name. Would you

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Gustavo Hexsel
Just as a side note: in most projects, alpha implies that changes in features or public APIs is possible or likely. Maybe it's not the case for Maven... []s Gus On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote: On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:

Re: Maven 3 alpha status

2010-01-29 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 2010-01-29, at 5:02 PM, Gustavo Hexsel wrote: Just as a side note: in most projects, alpha implies that changes in features or public APIs is possible or likely. Maybe it's not the case for Maven... From the CLI perspective nothing should change, so from that perspective there is