On 30 January 2010 02:38, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
could we use milestone as names in replacement for alpha, so that we
get
more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ?
I can understand the
On 2010-01-29, at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency
with type xml.zip. This dependency was declared in another module of the
reactor, and was a dependency of a plugin (maven-andromda-plugin). So there
is no
Which bug are your talking about? Have you filled something in Jira?
S.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency
with type xml.zip. This dependency was declared in another module of
could we use milestone as names in replacement for alpha, so that we get
more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ?
I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with alpha in
version name. Would you install Windows 8 alpha on your @work computer ? ;)
Janvier 2010, 15 h 14 min 59 s
Objet : Re: Maven 3 alpha status
Which bug are your talking about? Have you filled something in Jira?
S.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty bug with EAR plugin and dependency
with type
@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Ven 29 Janvier 2010, 15 h 14 min 59 s
Objet : Re: Maven 3 alpha status
Which bug are your talking about? Have you filled something in Jira?
S.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Julien HENRY wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I spend 2 hours fixing a nasty
On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
could we use milestone as names in replacement for alpha, so that we get
more early-adopter to test the (pre)release and detected regressions ?
I can understand the difficulty to suggest a build tool with alpha in
version name. Would you
Just as a side note: in most projects, alpha implies that changes in
features or public APIs is possible or likely. Maybe it's not the case for
Maven...
[]s Gus
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com wrote:
On 2010-01-29, at 4:09 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
On 2010-01-29, at 5:02 PM, Gustavo Hexsel wrote:
Just as a side note: in most projects, alpha implies that changes in
features or public APIs is possible or likely. Maybe it's not the case for
Maven...
From the CLI perspective nothing should change, so from that perspective there
is