I'm confused here. org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-ejb3-plugin doesn't
exist! I didn't even know there was an ejb3 packaging type.
/Anders
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> now coming up with an other question (related to MNG-5245):
>
> I'm checking the defaul
Hi,
now coming up with an other question (related to MNG-5245):
I'm checking the default-bindings.xml file in maven-core and found that
in the ejb packaging type the maven-ejb-plugin is pinned to 2.3 whereas
in the ejb3 packaging type the maven-ejb-plugin is not pinned to any
version.
Snippe
Hi,
> Can someone give me a hint what the "par" packaging is
> and in particular
where to find the "maven-par-plugin" ...cause i can't find a
maven-par-plugin except from springsource ...
ah i was to fast...now i found that is related to android development ...
Kind regards
Karl-Heinz
--
Softw
Hi there,
i have cloned the Maven-3 repo from github and started to dive into the
following task.
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5245
I have checked the default-bindings.xml in maven-core and found
something interesting.
Can someone give me a hint what the "par" packaging is and in pa
://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5245
> (sounds not too complicated to solve)...
>
> Kind regards
> Karl-Heinz Marbaise
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:56:47 -0500
>> Von: Jason van Zyl
>> An: "Maven Developers List&q
> Betreff: Re: Release Planning and Roadmap
> Just a reminder that there are six issues still in there without owners
> for 3.1.0. I'll flush those out tomorrow if no one claims them.
>
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> > I have put together a si
Just a reminder that there are six issues still in there without owners for
3.1.0. I'll flush those out tomorrow if no one claims them.
On Nov 13, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I have put together a simple roadmap using JIRA macros in Confluence to try
> and communicate to users wha
I plan to add some addition text in the roadmap with the overall objectives
along with the issues as I think we've become opaque again regarding the
deliverables. Maven is used so widely users just expect more information about
what's coming.
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:23 AM, Anders Hammar wrote:
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> Jason;
>
> Can you submit thread-safe local repository to apache for 3.1 or will
> I have to reimplement that too ?
The implementation here[1] I won't be submitting as that's been running for two
years in production and I'm not changi
Jason;
Can you submit thread-safe local repository to apache for 3.1 or will
I have to reimplement that too ?
Kristian
2012/11/13 Jason van Zyl :
> I have put together a simple roadmap using JIRA macros in Confluence to try
> and communicate to users what we're planning to do.
>
> https://cwik
A very big +1 for 6-8 weeks release cycles for core!
/Anders
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> I have put together a simple roadmap using JIRA macros in Confluence to
> try and communicate to users what we're planning to do.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display
I have put together a simple roadmap using JIRA macros in Confluence to try and
communicate to users what we're planning to do.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Roadmap
There are several issues in the 3.1.0 list that are unassigned, so as a matter
of course if you want to work
12 matches
Mail list logo