On 12/9/06, Jesse McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
continuum 1.0.3 has been out for a while now and there have been a lot
of tangible improvements that we should get into peoples hands in the
form of the alpha releases. I figured with labeling of alpha we can
freely change the model if we
By that logic then I think alpha is definitely what we could start
pulling off now and then with some milestones.
I know I really want to get the shortcuts bit that I been promoting on
another thread in place and that is some more api changes...for the
better too since I really want to see the
On 9 Dec 06, at 11:58 AM 9 Dec 06, Jesse McConnell wrote:
By that logic then I think alpha is definitely what we could start
pulling off now and then with some milestones.
I know I really want to get the shortcuts bit that I been promoting on
another thread in place and that is some more api
Hi,
If anything is thinking of doing a release of Continuum anytime soon
can you please update Continuum's JIRA so that it's representative of
what's going to be fixed for at least the next release like Kenney
and I have done for Maven itself:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
I don't
Hi,
Is what's in JIRA representative of the next release? Just wanted to
make sure that what's there actually gives users some idea of what's
coming up.
Also, I feel that the version should go back to alpha. Archiva is
simply not even close to being beta software and misrepresents it's
right, last time I brought this up the goal was to resolve all those
for an actual 1.1 release..
I would like to see maybe an alpha-1 release in January perhaps
followed up a beta or two once all the confirmed new features are in
place (like profiles, etc).
I think the decision had not be to
On 9 Dec 06, at 11:37 AM 9 Dec 06, Jesse McConnell wrote:
right, last time I brought this up the goal was to resolve all those
for an actual 1.1 release..
If that's the case that's cool.
I would like to see maybe an alpha-1 release in January perhaps
followed up a beta or two once all the
