Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-10 Thread Henri Gomez
More on this. With maven 2.0.9 here is the 'classpath' constructed by maven to jaxws : Maven 2.0.9 [DEBUG] Configuring mojo 'org.codehaus.mojo:jaxws-maven-plugin:1.10:wsgen' -- [DEBUG] (f) destDir = C:\Documents and Settings\gomezhe\Bureau\sample-wsgen\target\classes [DEBUG] (f) extension =

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 4-Jul-08, at 3:14 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: Here's some tips for folks trying to debug Maven/Plexus/Plugins in Eclipse. Using m2e you can actually debug/execute plugin _inside_ Eclipse. That means the plugin executes from the workspace in-situ. Extremely handy.

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-06 Thread Brett Porter
On 05/07/2008, at 2:17 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: As part of getting adequate coverage for vetting, I have just asked Nigel and Justin who watch over the Hudson instance here at Apache to setup the Maven jobs we require for validation. They are running on Solaris which will be a good

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-06 Thread Jason van Zyl
We'll get a Solaris VM running at Contegix but I'll try it when Nigel gives me access. The Hadoop stuff seems to be running all the time and it takes over an hour so our ITs would probably kill the machine. On 6-Jul-08, at 9:33 AM, Brett Porter wrote: On 05/07/2008, at 2:17 AM, Jason van

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Henri Gomez
Did the MNG-3586 is allready fixed or fix is delayed ? I got this mail : - Jason van Zyl updated MNG-3586: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1-alpha-1) 2.1-alpha-2 -- Very annoying bug for those of us using m2eclipse 0.9.4 and

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Henri Gomez
Here's some tips for folks trying to debug Maven/Plexus/Plugins in Eclipse. Using m2e you can actually debug/execute plugin _inside_ Eclipse. That means the plugin executes from the workspace in-situ. Extremely handy.

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Brett Porter
I was just looking at this Henri - though I'm not longer able to compile the provided test project so it's impossible to test. Can you review the project to help make it reproducible? Thanks, Brett On 04/07/2008, at 5:12 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: Did the MNG-3586 is allready fixed or fix is

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Henri Gomez
2008/7/4 Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I was just looking at this Henri - though I'm not longer able to compile the provided test project so it's impossible to test. Can you review the project to help make it reproducible? Done. Redone the test with m2eclipse 0.9.4 (using embedded) From

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
As part of getting adequate coverage for vetting, I have just asked Nigel and Justin who watch over the Hudson instance here at Apache to setup the Maven jobs we require for validation. They are running on Solaris which will be a good compliment to what we have running at Contegix.

Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-03 Thread Jason van Zyl
I have chopped the issue list down to what I know I'm going to look at here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidesorter/order=DESCsorter/field=priorityresolution=-1pid=10500fixfor=13143 If you want to add things you know you want to look at, go for it. But

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-03 Thread Brett Porter
On 04/07/2008, at 12:43 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: I have chopped the issue list down to what I know I'm going to look at here: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truemode=hidesorter/order=DESCsorter/field=priorityresolution=-1pid=10500fixfor=13143 If you want to add