Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Oleg Gusakov
I posted a short blog on the subject [http://tinyurl.com/c7m8qv], and in addition to that - I argue that LATEST and RELEASE are bad. What do you think? Extract: Let me first be clear about virtual versions as a whole: they are an excellent source of hard-to-find build

RE: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Timothy Reilly
Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No artifact's release pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or RELEASE anywhere. The later 2 should be

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Paul Gier
Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No artifact's release pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or RELEASE anywhere.

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Michael McCallum
how often do you really change the enterprise pom though? On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:24:25 Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
too often hence the itch that had me write versions-maven-plugin and the update-parent goal On 17/03/2009, Michael McCallum gho...@apache.org wrote: how often do you really change the enterprise pom though? On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:24:25 Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a

RE: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Jörg Schaible
Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a company converting 130+ projects from Ant to Maven. LATEST and RELEASE were invaluable. I do think there needs to be more thought around when they're allowed. No artifact's release pom should contain SNAPSHOT, LATEST or RELEASE

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Stephen Connolly
too often hence the itch that had me write versions-maven-plugin and the update-parent goal On 17/03/2009, Michael McCallum gho...@apache.org wrote: how often do you really change the enterprise pom though? On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:24:25 Timothy Reilly wrote: Hi Oleg, I just worked with a

Re: Virtual versions

2009-03-17 Thread Oleg Gusakov
do you know what breaks - an incompatible plugin or your unit test? This is even bigger question if you use virtual versions for expressing regular dependencies, not just plugins. Re-creating past releases and dependency trees it's a different story though. It's a lot to ask a build and deploy